Thc purposc of this .study is for ri~aking a model of building a library collcction dcnizn~cd on th.3 curriculum through thc inter-comparison of 15 standards for collcgc ant1 anivcrsily libraries in 5 countries (U. S. A.. Great Ikitain, Canada, Japan, and Icorca) Thc rcsult of thcscl colnpsrisons is as follow.. (1) Qu;~nlitalivc scope: of thc cull(:ction: (r/ Standards for a minimal collcction arc presented to about 100,000 vols (20-30 vols per student) for a ncw university and about 40,000 vols (40 vols pcr studcnt) for a nrnr collcge. $)$ Standards for a working collcction arc prescnted to 70-80 vols per student for a univer:aity and 50-60 vols per student for a college. $$ Standard for an intcnsive rescc~rch collcction is presented to morc than 100 vols p::r studcnt. (2) Stop: of the annual incrc;lsc cf thc collection: (i: Standard for a minimal collcction is ~~rescntcdto 1.4-2 vols per studcnt. $$ Standard for an intensive rrscarch or working collection is pcrsented to 4-5 vols pcr studcnt. (3) Scope of thc anni.1a1 budgetary standards: In Grcat I3ritain and U.S. A.. th-re aro assigned to 1 . 5 ~ 2 % of the collcge and university cxpcnditurr for books. $,$ In our country, it is prcscntcd to 3.5% of thc collcge and university expenditure for books, whcn my calculating by thc various factor analysis.