The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the periodontal conditions of distally extending cantilever bridges(CB) and removable patial dentures(RPD). 78 patients treated with removable partial dentures were divided into 2 groups; bilateral free-ending (type 1) and unilateral free-ending(type 2). 43 patients treated with distally extending cantilever bridges were divided into 4 groups according to position of missing molars and number of including abutment tooth (or teeth) (type 1-4). Prosthodontic status of the abutment teeth were assessed; overcontoured crown, overhanged margin, embrasure closure, and others. Their Periodonted status were assessed with Plaque Index Gingial Index(GI) Sulcus bleedy Index (SBI), Tooth mobility(TM) & Posher depth(PPD). 35.9% of RPD group and 38.1 of CB grouphad disconfort on mastication with prosthetics. 16.7% of RPD group and 6.1% of CB group showed on opposing sites. Overhanged margins were 58.3% for RPD group and 86.6% for GB group. 45.5% of RPD group and 72% of CB group had embrasure closure on the abutment teeth. 30.5% of GB group had oversized pontic. Gb group showed much higher clinical parameters than RPD groups, but statistically not significant. Type 2 of RPD group showed lower GI and SBI, but statistically not significant. Type 3 of CB group showed the highest GI and SBI and type 2 showed the highest tooth mobility, but there is no differences between the same type of groups. In conclusion, only minor differences in periodontal conditions were recorded in RPD and CB group.