전북대학교 병원에 입원하여 하복부 수술을 받는 미국 마취과학회 전신상태 분류상 class I, II인 환자 40명을 대상으로 수술후 morphine(1군)과 ketorolac(2군)을 지속적으로 정주한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1) 1군과 2군 모두 수술후 통증에 의의 있는 감소를 보였으며 군 간의 차이는 없었다. 2) 1군에서 2군보다 부작용의 빈도가 많았다. 이상의 결과로 수술후 통증 관리에 있어서 morphine과 ketorolac의 지속적 정맥 주입 방법은 모두 효과적이었으며, ketorolac이 morphine보다 부작용의 발현 빈도가 더 적은것으로 보아 morphine을 대신할 수 있는 유용한 약물로 사료된다.
Despite their sometimes fatal complications such as respiratory depression when used for postoperative pain control, intravenous and epidural narcotics remain the mainstay of treatment regimens. Because of the problems, anesthesiologists are seeking alternatives. We compared the analgesic effect and complications of continuous intravenous morphine with ketorolac. Ketorolac is a non-steroidal agent with potent analgesics and moderate anti-inflammatory activity. Forty ASA physical status I or II patients were given morphine(20 patients) or ketorolac(20 patients):In the morphine group, an initial bolus dose of 2 mg i.v. was given followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 1 mg/hr for 48 hours. The ketorolac group was given initial bolus of 30 mg i.v. This was followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 3.75 mg/hr for 48 hours using a Baxter Daymate Infuser. We checked systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure, heart rate, visual analogue scale(VAS) and the Prince Henry Score(PHS). This was done before the initial bolus, at 5, 15, 30 and 60 min, at 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after administration. We observed the side effects nausea and vomiting, pruritus, hypotension, somnolence, urinary retention and respiratory depression. From our study we believe ketorolac in selected patients, is as effective as morphine in alleviating postoperative pain without side effects of morphine.
