기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
위암환자의 입원시 영양상태
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 위암환자의 입원시 영양상태
저자명
안수미,윤기영,김은실,강원근,류동원,김태현,최경현,정은애,임선계,김홍선,이금숙,김종숙,이선옥,An. Su-Mi,Yun. Gi-Yeong,Kim. Eun-Sil,Gang. Won-Geun,Ryu. Dong-Won,Kim. Tae-H
간행물명
대한영양사협회 학술지
권/호정보
2002년|8권 3호|pp.217-226 (10 pages)
발행정보
대한영양사협회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

The purpose of this study is to investigate initial nutritional status of stomach cancer patients. The study subjects were 88 patients with stomach cancer admitted at Kosin University Gospel Hospital in Busan. We assessed the initial nutritional status by anthropometric, biochemical and dietary intake data along with subjective global assessment(SGA). The results are as follows. 1. The mean age, weight, height, triceps skinfold thickness, mid arm circumference, and mid arm muscle circumference of the subjects were 55.9$pm$11.0years, 60.0$pm$9.8kg, 162.4$pm$8.5cm, 10.9$pm$5.7mm, 26.8$pm$3.8cm, and 23.4$pm$3.5cm respectively. The mean body mass index was within the normal range, with 22.7$pm$2.8kg/m2, while 15.4% of the patients was underweight. The result shows that body fat mass and body protein mass of the patients with stomach cancer were decreased. 2. The mean biochemical data of the subjects were 4.0$pm$0.5g/dl for albumin, 174.7$pm$41.9mg/dl for cholesterol, 107.6$pm$57.2mg/dl for triglyceride, 92.1μg/dl for Zn,  297.0$pm$103.1mg/dl for transferrin, 1980.0$pm$0.8$mm^3$ for total lymphocyte count. 3. Daily energy intake was 1997.8$pm$579.3kcal. And the ratio of carbohydrate, protein, and lipid to energy intake was 72:14:14. 4. The patients were divided into three groups according to SGA performed by an observer. Group A(well nourished) was 55.7% with 49 patients, Group B(moderately malnourished) was 22.7 % with 20 patients, and Group C(severely malnourished) was 21.6 % with 19 patients. The three groups showed a significant difference in body weight(p<0.01), 1 month weight loss %(p<0.001), 6 months weight loss %(p<0.001), body mass index(p<0.01), and mid arm circumference(p<0.05), albumin(p<0.01), energy intake(p<0.05) as well as carbohydrate intake(p<0.05). From these results, it may be concluded that SGA can be used as a nutrition screening tool, and comprehensive nutrition assessment is desirable for those malnourished.