기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
건강한 자원자에서 Udenafil 100 mg 제형 및 200 mg 제형 간 약동학적 특성 비교
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 건강한 자원자에서 Udenafil 100 mg 제형 및 200 mg 제형 간 약동학적 특성 비교
저자명
신광희,김정렬,조주연,윤서현,신현숙,장인진,신상구,유경상,Shin. Kwang-Hee,Kim. Jung-Ryul,Cho. Joo-Youn,Yoon. Seo-Hyun,Shin. Hyun-Suk,Jang. In-Jin,Shin. Sa
간행물명
臨床藥理學會誌= The journal of Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
권/호정보
2008년|16권 1호|pp.45-52 (8 pages)
발행정보
대한임상약리학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Background: Udenafil is a new phosphodiesterase (PDE) 5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. The safety and efficacy of udenafil were shown in clinical studies, and two dosing regimens (100 mg and 200 mg) received marketing approval for 100 mg tablets. In this study, we compared the pharmacokinetics between udenafil 100 mg tablets and 200 mg tablets. Methods: The pharmacokinetic characteristics of the 200 mg strength formulation were compared with the 100 mg strength formulation in an open-labeled, randomized, two-way crossover study in 20 healthy male volunteers. A group of 9 subjects were dosed one udenafil 200 mg tablet and administered two 100 mg tablets one week later. Another group of 11 subjects were dosed in the opposite sequence. As an outcome, plasma udenafil concentration-time profiles were obtained. Pharmacokinetic characteristics were analyzed using the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration ($C_{max}$) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity ($AUC_{inf}$). Results: The two dosage formulations showed similar concentration-time profiles. The geometric mean ratio of $C_{max}$ of udenafil 200 mg formulation to 100 mg formulation was 0.94 and the 90% confidence interval was 0.86-1.02. The geometric mean ratio of $AUC_{inf}$ was 0.93 and the 90% confidence interval for the two regimens was 0.87 - 1.00. Conclusion: The 200 mg tablets showed similar pharmacokinetic characteristics compared to the 100 mg tablets as judged from the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratio for $C_{max}$ and $AUC_{inf}$ that were both within a range of log 0.80 - log 1.25.