기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
EFFECTS OF SUPPORT STRUCTURE CHANGES ON FLOW-INDUCED VIBRATION CHARACTERISTICS OF STEAM GENERATOR TUBES
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • EFFECTS OF SUPPORT STRUCTURE CHANGES ON FLOW-INDUCED VIBRATION CHARACTERISTICS OF STEAM GENERATOR TUBES
  • EFFECTS OF SUPPORT STRUCTURE CHANGES ON FLOW-INDUCED VIBRATION CHARACTERISTICS OF STEAM GENERATOR TUBES
저자명
Ryu. Ki-Wahn,Park. Chi-Yong,Rhee. Hui-Nam
간행물명
Nuclear engineering and technology : an international journal of the Korean Nuclear Society
권/호정보
2010년|42권 1호|pp.97-108 (12 pages)
발행정보
한국원자력학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Fluid-elastic instability and turbulence-induced vibration of steam generator U-tubes of a nuclear power plant are studied numerically to investigate the effect of design changes of support structures in the upper region of the tubes. Two steam generator models, Model A and Model B, are considered in this study. The main design features of both models are identical except for the conditions of vertical and horizontal support bars. The location and number of vertical and horizontal support bars at the middle of the U-bend region in Model A differs from that of Model B. The stability ratio and the amplitude of turbulence-induced vibration are calculated by a computer program based on the ASME code. The mode shape with a large modal displacement at the upper region of the U-tube is the key parameter related to the fretting wear between the tube and its support structures, such as vertical, horizontal, and diagonal support bars. Therefore, the location and the number of vertical and horizontal support bars have a great influence on the fretting wear mechanism. The variation in the stability ratios for each vibrational mode is compared with respect to Model A and Model B. Even though both models satisfy the design criteria, Model A shows substantial improvements over Model B, particularly in terms of having greater amplitude margins in the turbulence-excited vibration (especially at the inner region of the tube bundle) and better stability ratios for the fluid-elastic instability.