기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF INTEGRATED SYSTEM OF HEAT RECOVERY COGENERATION LOOP AND ELECTRIC HEAT PUMP WITH DETAILED BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF INTEGRATED SYSTEM OF HEAT RECOVERY COGENERATION LOOP AND ELECTRIC HEAT PUMP WITH DETAILED BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION
  • FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF INTEGRATED SYSTEM OF HEAT RECOVERY COGENERATION LOOP AND ELECTRIC HEAT PUMP WITH DETAILED BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION
저자명
Seo. Dong-Hyun,Koh. Jae-Yoon,Park. Yool
간행물명
International journal of air-conditioning and refrigeration
권/호정보
2010년|18권 1호|pp.31-41 (11 pages)
발행정보
대한설비공학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Recent energy and economic analysis of a cogeneration system has been implemented by a manual calculation that is based on monthly thermal loads of buildings. In this study, a cogeneration system modeling validation with a detail building energy simulation, eQUEST, for a building energy and cost prediction has been implemented. By analyzing the hourly building electricity and thermal loads, it enables designers to decide proper cogeneration system capacity and to estimate more reliable building energy consumption. eQUEST also verified economical and environmental benefits when the heat pump system is integrated with the cogeneration system because the mechanical system configuration benefits from the high efficiency heat pump system while avoiding the building electricity demand increase. Economic analysis such as LCC (Life Cycle Cost) method is carried out to verify economical benefits of the system by applying actual utility rates of KEPCO (Korea Electricity Power COmpany) and KOGAS (KOrea GAS company). As results, the proposed system consumed approximately 40% less energy than the Alt-2 in terms of source energy. LCC analysis results also show that the proposed system could save about 10-14% of energy cost during the life cycle compared to the Alt-1 and Alt-2. It could save 6 7% of the total life cycle cost and it is equivalent to around 1-1.3 billion Won in cost.