기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
이중 에너지 엑스레이 흡수기의 가동 시간에 따른 골밀도 값의 평가
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 이중 에너지 엑스레이 흡수기의 가동 시간에 따른 골밀도 값의 평가
저자명
이해정,김호성,김은혜,Lee. Hae-Jung,Kim. Ho-Sung,Kim. Eun-Hye
간행물명
핵의학기술
권/호정보
2010년|14권 1호|pp.40-45 (6 pages)
발행정보
대한핵의학기술학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

Purpose: Recently, the performance of the X-ray tube was very much improved by the power generation of the technology. However, the overload of equipment is occurred by the increment of the equipment operating time according to the increment of the examination number of cases. The X-ray dose can change by heat occurrence of the X-ray tube due to this. Moreover, the change of the bone mineral density value is possible to occur. Therefore, We tries to whether the change of the bone mineral density value of each equipment according to the difference of the examination number of cases and operating time occur or not. Materials and Methods: The BMD value was measured by the Aluminum Spine Phantom and the European Spine Phantom in each equipment, in order to find out about the difference of the time general classification bone mineral density value by using the Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. And after scanning each phantom by using X-ray dose meter (Unfors Mult-O-Meter), a dose was measured by the same condition. As to, an average and standard deviation were found and the change of each equipment much BMD value was compared and it evaluated. Results: $Mean{pm}SD$ of each equipment by using the Aluminum Spine Phantom, A equipment was $1.174{pm}0.002$, $1.171{pm}0.005$, $1.173{pm}0.005$, B equipment was $1.186{pm}0.003$, $1.187{pm}0.003$, $1.185{pm}0.003$, C equipment was $1.180{pm}0.003$, $1.182{pm}0.004$, $1.183{pm}0.002$, D equipment was $1.188{pm}0.004$, $1.185{pm}0.003$, $1.185{pm}0.004$. By using the European Spine Phantom, A equipment was $1.143{pm}0.006$, $1.153{pm}0.009$, $1.161{pm}0.003$, B equipment was $1.134{pm}0.004$, $1.13{pm}0.008$, $1.127{pm}0.015$, C equipment was $1.143{pm}0.006$, $1.134{pm}0.01$, $1.133{pm}0.006$, D equipment was $1.14{pm}0.001$, $1.122{pm}0.002$, $1.131{pm}0.008$, altogether included in the normal range. Conclusion: There was no significant change of the BMD value of using a phantom by time zones. Therefore, if the quality control is made to use the extent management method of the equipment for beginning in the present application, the reliability of the BMD equipment will be able to be enhanced.