Purpose: This study was performed to compare the contact area between three different correcting angles after the proximal crescentic and Ludloff osteotomies of the first metatarsal. Materials and Methods: We used the two sawbone models. Proximal crescentic (PCO) and Ludloff osteotomies (LO) were performed and secured using K-wires under the correcting intermetatarsal angle (IMA) $5^{circ}$, $10^{circ}$, and $15^{circ}$. Then each 6 osteotomized model was scanned five times and measured the contact area using the calculating program. We excluded the highest and lowest values. Results: The mean area of cutting surface was 189 $mm^2$ in PCO, 863 $mm^2$ in LO. The mean contact area (contact ratio; contact area $ imes$100/area of cutting surface) of PCO was 149 $mm^2$ (79%) in $5^{circ}$, 139.5 $mm^2$ (74%) in $10^{circ}$, 107 $mm^2$ (57%) in $15^{circ}$ IMA. The mean contact area (contact ratio) of LO was 711 $mm^2$ (82%) in $5^{circ}$, 535.5 $mm^2$ (62%) in $10^{circ}$, 330 $mm^2$ (38%) in $15^{circ}$ IMA. Conclusion: A significant decrease in the contact area and contact ratio according to increase in correcting IMA was noticed in LO. We recommend the PCO rather than LO, when the IMA is needed to correct over $15^{circ}$.