기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
EnergyPlus의 시뮬레이션 결과와 실제 냉방에너지 사용량의 비교 분석 및 GHP와 EHP의 에너지 성능비교에 관한 연구
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • EnergyPlus의 시뮬레이션 결과와 실제 냉방에너지 사용량의 비교 분석 및 GHP와 EHP의 에너지 성능비교에 관한 연구
저자명
김동균,전종욱,김강수,Kim. Dong-Kyun,Jeon. Jong-Ug,Kim. Kang-Soo
간행물명
大韓建築學會論文集 : Journal of the architectural institute of Korea : Planning & design / 計劃系
권/호정보
2011년|27권 5호|pp.237-244 (8 pages)
발행정보
대한건축학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

This paper is focused on the energy performance evaluation of Gas Engine Driven Heat Pump (GHP) and Electric Heat Pump (EHP) in accordance with the conversion factors for primary energy and secondary energy. Generally, primary energy of gas consumption is lower than that of electric consumption due to different conversion factors. For this study, we measured actual energy consumption for a target building in which GHP was installed with outdoor unit as HVAC system. The measured data was compared with simulated results from EnergyPlus developed by Department of Energy in USA. As a verifying results, the mean bias error and the root mean squared error of gas consumption were -0.19% and 10.5%, respectively. When we applied electric charge for general building, the cooling operating cost of the EHP was more expensive than that of the GHP in the building. However, operating cost of EHP showed lower than operating cost of GHP when we applied electric charge for the educational building due to reduced charge in accordance of building purpose. Even though the primary energy use of EHP was more used than that of GHP by 27.2%, secondary energy of GHP was higher than that of EHP by 42.6%, because the EHP has high-performance of COP 3.59 compared with the GHP performance of COP 1.13. Therefore, it is desirable to use gas for cooling energy of in a target building for primary energy.