기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
Comparison between Artificial Neural Network and Response Surface Methodology in the Prediction of the Production Rate of Polyacrylonitrile Electrospun Nanofibers
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Comparison between Artificial Neural Network and Response Surface Methodology in the Prediction of the Production Rate of Polyacrylonitrile Electrospun Nanofibers
  • Comparison between Artificial Neural Network and Response Surface Methodology in the Prediction of the Production Rate of Polyacrylonitrile Electrospun Nanofibers
저자명
Nasouri. Komeil,Shoushtari. Ahmad Mousavi,Khamforoush. Mehrdad
간행물명
Fibers and polymers
권/호정보
2013년|14권 11호|pp.1849-1856 (8 pages)
발행정보
한국섬유공학회
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

This paper focused on using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) to analyze production rate of electrospun nanofibers. The three important electrospinning factors were studied including polymer concentration (wt %), applied voltage (kV) and the nozzle-collector distance (cm). The predicted production rates were in agreement with the experimental results in both ANN and RSM techniques. High regression coefficient between the variables and the response ($R^2=0.975$) indicates excellent evaluation of experimental data by second-order polynomial regression model. The regression coefficient was 0.988, which indicates that the ANN model was shows good fitting with experimental data. The obtained results indicate that the performance of ANN was better than RSM. It was concluded that applied voltage plays an important role (relative importance of 42.8 %) against production rate of electrospun nanofibers. The RSM model predicted the 2802.3 m/min value of the highest production rate at conditions of 15 wt % polymer concentration, 16 kV of the applied voltage, and 15 cm of nozzle-collector distance. The predicted value showed only 4.4 % difference with experimental results in which 2931.0 m/min at the same setting was observed.