기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
장바구니
 고객센터
본문검색
  • 검색 히스토리
실시간 인기검색어
서지반출
The three most significant contributions of criminological theories to our theoretical understanding of criminal behavior made since 1985
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • The three most significant contributions of criminological theories to our theoretical understanding of criminal behavior made since 1985
  • 범죄학 이론의 발전에 영향을 미친 이론들에 대한 고찰: -1985년 이후의 중요한 범죄이론을 중심으로-
ㆍ 저자명
Jang, Duck-Hyung
ㆍ 간행물명
시큐리티연구KCI
ㆍ 권/호정보
2015년|42호(통권42호)|pp.449-468 (20 pages)
ㆍ 발행정보
한국보안관리학회(구:한국경호경비학회)|한국
ㆍ 파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트(0.93MB)
ㆍ 주제분야
사회과학
서지반출

영문초록

It is important to identify and discuss what the most vial contributions of criminological theories. In the field of criminology, most significant contributions or advancement have been made on the various issues such as age, the integration of structural and procedural level theories, other theoretical integration debates. However, it is hard to find ant systematic study exploring such a contribution in criminological theories. This study, therefore, has a purpose to discuss three most significant contributions to our theoretical understanding of criminal behavior made since 1985. To accomplish the study purpose, this study choose the followed three theoretical contributions; the emergence of life course theory, the revision of social disorganization theory, and the introduction of social structure and social Learning (SSSL) model. The three theoretical works will be introduced and discussed regarding other theoretical integration trends in the body of this study. The conclusion, contribution of this current study has been discussed in the last conclusion and discussion section.

영문초록

이 연구는 1985년 이후의 범죄학 이론의 발전에 심대한 영향을 미친 것으로 이해되는 세 가지의 주요 범죄학 이론들에 대해 고찰한 연구이다. 지난 수십 년간의 범죄학 이론의 발전은 눈부시다. 그러나 국내에서는 그 간의 범죄학이론의 발전에 영향을 미친 주요 이론 들에 대한 논의가 매우 부족하였. 앞으로의 한국의 범죄학이론의 발전을 위해서 현재까지 의 범죄학이론을 발전시킨 이론들에 대한 고찰은 매우 중요하다. 이에 따라 이 연구는 1985년 이후의 범죄학이론의 발전에 큰 영향을 미친 것으로 이해되는 생애과정이론(life course theory), 사회해체이론, 그리고 사회구조 및 사회학습이론(the SSSL model)의 세 가 지의 범죄학 이론들에 대해 소개하고 현재까지의 각 이론들의 경험적지지 및 주요 이론적 쟁점 및 공헌점들에 대해 논의하였다. 결론과 논의부분에서 저자의 결론, 연구의 공헌점 등이 논의되었다.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Age, structural factors, and theoretical integration
Ⅲ. The three works of theoretical contributions of the
major contributions, age, structural factors, and
theoretical integration
Ⅳ. Conclusion and discussion
참고문헌

키워드

criminologytheory contributionslife course theorysocial disorganization theorythe social structure and social learning model범죄학이론이론적 공헌생애과정이론(life course theory)사회해체이론그리고 사회구조 및 사회학습이론(the SSSL model)

참고문헌 (47건)

  • Akers, R. L., 1998. Social learning and social structure: a general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  • Akers, R. L. & Sellers, C. S. (2009). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application. 5thed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Akers, R. L., & Cochran, J. (1985). Adolescent marijuana use: A test of three theories of deviant behavior. Deviant Behavior, 6, 323-346.
  • Akers, R. L., & Lee, G. (1996). A longitudinal test of social learning theory: Adolescent smoking. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 317-346.
  • Blau, J., & Blau, P.M. (1982). The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review, 47, 114-129.
  • Bursik, R.J., Jr., (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26(4), 519-551.
  • Bursik, R. J., & Grasmick, H.G. (1993). Neighborhood and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. New York: Lexington Books.
  • Burt, C. H., Simons, S R. L., & Simons, L. G. (2006). A longitudinal test of the effects of parenting and the stability of self-control: Negative evidence for the general theory of crime. Criminology, 44:353-396.
  • Dorthey, E. E. (2006). Self-control, social bonds, and desistance: A test of life-course interdependence. Criminology, 44:807- 833.
  • Elliott, D.S. 1994. Serious violent offenders: Onset, developmental course, and termination. Criminology, 32:1-22.
  • Esbensen, F. A. & E. P. Deschenes. (1998). "A Multisite Examination of Youth Gang Membership: Does Gender Matter?" Criminology 36:799-827.
  • Gottfredson, M. R., & T. Hirschi. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
  • Haynie, D. L., Silver, E., & Teasdale, B. (2006). Neighborhood characteristics, peer networks, and adolescent violence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 247–169.
  • DeCoster. (2003). Delinquency and depression: A gendered role-taking and social learning perspective. Theory. pp. 127-150 in R. L. Akers and G. F. Jensen, (eds.). Social Learning Theory and the Explanation of Crime: A Guide for the New Century. Advances in Criminological Theory, Volume 11. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Holland-Davis, L. (2006). Putting Behavior in Context: A Test of the Social Structure Social Learning Model. Ph. D. Dissertation. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
  • Hwang, S., & Akers, R. L. (2003). Substance use by Korean adolescents: A cross-cultural test of social learning, social bonding, and self-control theories. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century, advances in criminological theory (Vol. 11, pp. 39-63). NewBrunswick,NJ:Transaction.
  • Kubrin, C. E. & Weitzer, R. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40:374-402.
  • Krohn, M.D., Skinner, W.F., Massey, J.L., & Akers, R.L. (1985). Social learning theory and adolescent cigarette smoking: A longitudinal study. Social Problems, 32, 455-473.
  • Lanza Kaduce, L., & Capece, M. (2003). A specific test of an integrated general Theory. pp. 179-196 in R. L. Akers and G. F. Jensen, (eds.). Social Learning Theory and the Explanation of Crime: A Guide for the New Century. Advances in Criminological Theory, Volume 11. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Lanza-Kaduce, L., Capece, M., & Alden, H. (2006). Liquor is quicker: Gender and social learning among college students. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12:127-143.
  • Laub, J. H., D. S. Nagin, & R. J. Sampson. (1998). “Trajectories of Change in Criminal Offending: Good Marriages and the Desistance Process.” American Sociological Review, 63: 225-238.
  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson. R. J. (1995). “The Long-Term Effects of Punitive Discipline.” Pp. 247-258 in Coercion and Punishment in Long-Term Perspectives, ed. Joan McCord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • ----------------------------. (1998). “The Long-Term Reach of Adolescent Competence: Socioeconomic Achievement in the Lives of Disadvantaged Men.” Pp. 89-112 in Competence and Character Through Life, ed. Anne Colby, Jacquelyn James, and Daniel Hart. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • ---------------------------. (2003). Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
  • Laub, J. H., Sampson, R. J., & Sweeten. G. A. (2006). Assessing Sampson and Laub’s life-course theory of crime. In Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory, Advances in Criminological Theory, 15, eds. Francis T. Cullen, John Paul Wright, and Kristie Belvins. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Lowenkamp, C.T., Cullen, F.T., & Pratt, T.C. (2003). Replicating Sampson and Groves’s test of social disorganization theory: Revisiting a criminological classic. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 351-373.
  • Lilly, J. R., Cullen, F. T., & Ball, R. A. (2007). Criminological theory: Context and consequences. 4thed.T housandOaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Moffit, T.E. 1993. Adolescence-limited and life course persistent antisocial behavior. A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
  • Pratt, T. C., Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. R. (2004). Parental socialization and community context: A longitudinal analysis of the structural sources of low self-control.
  • Piquero, N. L. (2005). Causes and prevention of intellectual property crime. Trends in Organized Crime, 8, 40-61.
  • Simons, R. L., C. J., R. Conger, & Elder. G. H. (1998). A test of latent trait versus life course perspectives on the stability of adolescent antisocial behavior. Criminology, 36:217–44.
  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub. J. H. (1993). Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Sampson, R. J. & Groves, B. W. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774-802.
  • Sampson, R. J. (1993). The Community Context of Violent Crime. in Sociology and the Public Agenda, edited by William Julius Wilson. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 267-74.
  • Sampson, R.J., Morenoff, J., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633-660.
  • Sampson, R. J., & Wilson, W. J. (1995). Toward a theory of race, crime and urban inequality. In John Hagan & Ruth Peterson (eds.), Crime and Inequality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Shaw, C. & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Warr, M. (1993). Age, peers, and delinquency. Criminology, 31, 17-40.
  • --------. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36:183–216. Sampson, R. J., & Laub. J. H. (1992). Crime and deviance in the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 18:63–84.
  • ---------------------------. (1995). Understanding variability in lives through time: Contributions of life-course criminology. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 4:143–58.
  • Verrill, S. W. (2008). Social structure-social learning and delinquency: Mediation or moderation? New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
  • Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M.D. (2005). Applying interactional theory to the expiation of continuity and change in antisocial behavior. In D.P. Farrington (EDd.), Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending (Advances in Criminological Theory, 14, pp.183-209). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
  • Winfree, L. T., Mays, G. L., & Backstrom. T. V. (1994). "Youth Gangs and Incarcerated Delinquents: Exploring the Ties between Gang Membership, Delinquency and Social Learning Theory." Justice Quarterly ,11:229-255.
  • Winfree, L. T., Sellers, C. S., & Clason. D.L. (1993). "Social Learning Theory and Adolescent Deviance Abstention: Toward Understanding the Reasons for Initiating, Quitting, and Avoiding Drugs." Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9:101-125.
  • Wright, D. A., Bobashev, G., & Folsom, R. (2007). Understanding the relative influence of neighborhood, family, and youth on adolescent drug use. Substance Use and Misuse, 42:2159-2171.
  • Wu, Z. H., Eschbach, K., & Gardy, J.J. (2008). Contextual influences on ploydrug use among young, low-income women: Effects of neighborhood and personal networks. The American Journal on Additions, 17:135-144.
  • Uggen, C. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65:529–46.
구매하기 (4,900)
장바구니
추천 연관논문