기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
장바구니
 고객센터
본문검색
  • 검색 히스토리
실시간 인기검색어
서지반출
목표설정이론에 기초한 대학생 학습관리 프로그램 개발 및 효과 연구
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 목표설정이론에 기초한 대학생 학습관리 프로그램 개발 및 효과 연구
  • Development and effectiveness research of learning management program for university students based on goal-setting theory
ㆍ 저자명
김민아, 박승호
ㆍ 간행물명
교육학연구KCI
ㆍ 권/호정보
2016년|54권 4호(통권172호)|pp.233-262 (30 pages)
ㆍ 발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
ㆍ 파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(1.7MB)
ㆍ 주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구의 목적은 목표설정이론과 자기조절학습이론을 통합하여 대학생이 목표를 스스로 설정하고그것을 실행에 옮기는 과정에 필요한 학습관리 프로그램을 개발하고, 이렇게 통합된 프로그램이 대학생의 자기조절학습의 향상과 만성적으로 나타나는 학업적 지연행동의 감소에 영향을 미치는지를 검증하며, 구체적이고 도전적인 목표설정이 학업성취(평점 평균 및 지각된 성취도)를 향상시키는지 검증하는 것이었다. 연구를 위해 서울시에 위치한 1개 대학에서 실험집단 32명, 비교집단 32명으로 총 64명이 자발적으로 참여하였다. 프로그램에 참여한 학생들의 사전-사후검사에 대한 변화를 분석하기 위해대응표본 t-검증을 실시하였다. 또한 목표설정이론에 기초한 학습관리 프로그램이 효과적인지 검증하기 위해 1피험자 간(실험집단/비교집단)-1피험자 내(사전/사후)실험을 설계하였다. 연구 결과, 목표설정이론에 기초한 학습관리 프로그램에 참여한 실험집단은 비교집단보다 자기조절학습 능력이 향상되었다. 자기조절학습의 세 가지 구성요소에서 모두 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이며 향상되었다. 또한실험집단은 학업적 지연행동을 덜 나타내었다. 그러나 집단과 시기에 따른 상호작용 효과에서 실험집단의 학업적 지연행동 감소가 비교집단에 비해 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 마지막으로, 전체 학기 평점 평균은 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 반면, 실험집단의 지각된 성취도는 비교집단에 비해 참여 전과 후에 따라 차이가 나타났다. 결론적으로 본 연구에서 개발한 학습관리 프로그램이 자기조절학습 능력의 향상, 학업적 지연행동의 감소, 지각된 성취도에는 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 반면, 학업성취도 수준(평점 평균)의 향상에는 영향을 미치지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 결론적으로 목표를 일시적으로 다룬 기존 학습 관련 프로그램들과는 달리, 목표설정의 전체적인 흐름을자기조절학습의 네 단계에 따라 장기적으로 다룬 것이 학생들의 자기조절학습 능력 발달에 영향을 미쳤으며, 학생들을 목표 설정의 주체가 되도록 함으로써 목표에 대한 세부적인 계획을 수립하였고 학습에 대한 미루기 행동을 감소시켰다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

영문초록

This study was to develop a learning program for training university students in goal-setting by themselves and to examine the effectiveness of this program. The objective of this study was to get student participants to set their own goals in their courses and regulate a goal-setting process for achieving these goals. To examine the effectiveness of the program, quantitative data were collected from en experimental group and a comparison group, 32 university students in each group. To analyze the effectiveness of the program, this study conducted paired sample t-test for intra-individual changing in the participating students and a 2x2 repeated ANOVA(analysis of variance) for one between-subjects and one within-subject design. The results are summarized as follows. The results of this study showed that 1) the learning management program for training university students improved their self-regulated learning. 2) The program decreased academic procrastination. In intra-individual change, the program was significantly effective in decreasing the students’ academic procrastination. 3) The program did not increase the students’ GPAs, but it did not cause a decline in their current grades either. However, 4) the program improved the participating students’ perceived achievement about learning.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 목표설정이론에 기초한 대학생 학습관리 프로그램의 개발
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과 및 해석
Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

키워드

대학생 학습관리 프로그램목표설정이론자기조절학습학업적 지연행동학업 성취

참고문헌 (47건)

  • 김아영 (2010). 학업동기 –이론, 연구와 적용-. 서울: 학지사. (Translated in English) Kim, A. Y.(2010) Academic Motivation: Theory, Research, and Application. Seoul: Hakjisa Publisher, Inc.
  • 김은영 (2006). 대학생 동기조절 훈련 프로그램의 개발 및 효과. 박사학위논문. 서울여자대학교. (Translated in English) Kim, E. Y.(2006). Development and effectiveness of motivation regulation training program for university students. Doctoral dissertation. Seoul Women’s University.
  • 김은영 (2013). 대학생을 위한 행동조절 중심 자기조절학습 프로그램의 개발 및 효과. 교육종합연구, 11(1), 21-44. (Translated in English) Kim, E. Y.(2013). Development and Effect of Focused Behavior Regulation Self-Regulated Learning Strategy Program for College Students. The Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 21-44.
  • 김정희 (2000). 습관적 지연 극복을 위한 집단훈련의 효과 검증: 대학생의 학업과 관련하여, 석사학위논문. 이화여자대학교. (Translated in English) Kim, J. H.(2000). Effects of Group Training on Procrastination : Concerning College Students' Study. Master’s dissertation. Ehwa Women’s University.
  • 김창대, 김형수, 신을진, 이상희, 최한나 (2011). 상담 및 심리교육 프로그램 개발과 평가. 서울: 학지사. (Translated in English) Kim, C. D., Kim, H. S., Shin, E. J., Lee, S. H., and Choi, H. N.(2011). Counseling and Psychological Education: Program development and Evaluation. Seoul: Hakjisa Publisher, Inc.
  • 박민정, 최임숙 (2012). 학습기술 향상 프로그램이 대학생의 자기주도적 학습전략 특성에 미치는 효과. 교육연구논총, 33(2), 1-30. (Translated in English) Park, M, J. and Choi, I, S.(2012). The Effects of Study Skills Training Program on Self-Directed Learning Strategies of College Students. CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 33(2), 1-30.
  • 박승호 (2003). 자기조절학습의 발달을 위한 동기적 요인의 역할. 교육심리연구, 17(1), 55-70. (Translated in English) Park, S. H.(2003). The Role of Motivational Factors in the Development of Self-Regulated Learning. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 17(1), 55-70.
  • 박승호, 서은희 (2005). 여자 대학생들의 학업적 지연행동의 실태 및 원인분석. 교육학연구, 43(2), 115-134. (Translated in English) Park, S. H. and Seo, E. H.(2005). Women College Students' Academic Procrastination. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 43(2), 115-134.
  • 박중길, 이경환 (2011). 체육수업에서 학생의 노력과 지속행동을 위한 목표설정과 자기-모니터링 의 효과. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 22(2), 1-17. (Translated in English) Park, J. G. and Lee, K, H.(2011). Effects of Goal-Setting and Self-Monitoring on Students` Effort and Persistence in Physical Education Classes. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology, 22(2), 1-17.
  • 서은희 (2006). 학업적 지연행동 극복 프로그램 개발 및 효과 연구. 박사학위논문. 연세대학교. (Translated in English) Seo, E, H.(2006). A study for the development of a treatment program for overcoming academic procrastination of college students. Doctoral dissertation. Yonsei University.
  • 서은희, 박승호 (2007). 의지통제와 학업적 지연행동의 관계. 교육심리연구, 21(2), 423-436. (Translated in English) Seo, E. H. and Park, S. H.(2007). The Relation Between Volitional Control and Academic Procrastination. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(2), 423-436.
  • 신명희, 박승호, 서은희 (2005). 자기조절학습과 지연행동과의 관계. 교육학연구, 43(4), 277-292. (Translated in English) Synn, M. H., Park, S. H., and Seo, E. H.(2005). The relation between self-regulated learning and Procrastination. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 43(4), 277-292.
  • 유소연 (2011). 이러닝 환경에서 학습실재감이 지각된 성취도와 만족도에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문. 한양대학교. (Translated in English) Yu, S. Y.(2011). (The) effects of learning presence on perceived achievement and satisfaction in e-learning environment. Master’s dissertation. Hanyang University.
  • 이현주 (2013). 목표 중요성, 수행 피드백, 성취목표지향성 간의 상호작용이 자기조절에 미치는 영향: 대학생의 학습시간 투자를 중심으로. 교육심리연구, 27(4), 829-952. (Translated in English) Lee, H. J.(2013). The Interaction Effects between Goal Importance, Performance Feedback, Achievement Goal Orientations on Self-Regulation: Colleges Students’ Studying Time. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 27(4), 829-952.
  • 최영미, 송인섭 (2013). 대학생의 미래지향목표, 근접하위목표, 과제도구성지각 및 자기조절전략 간의 구조적 관계. 교육심리연구, 27(1), 77-98. (Translated in English) Choi, Y. M. and Song, I. S.(2013). The Structural Relationship Among University Students` Future-Oriented Goals, Proximal Subgoals, Perceived Task Instrumentality, and Self-Regulation Strategies. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 27(1), 77-98.
  • 통계청 (2015.6.29.). 2014년 생활시간조사 결과. http://www.kosis.kr 새소식/보도자료/보건·사회. (Translated in English) Statistics(2015.6.29.). Life Time Survey Results(2014). http://www.kosis.kr
  • Bandura. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  • Bandura, A., & Simon, K. M. (1977). The role of proximal intentions in self-regulation of refractory behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 177-193.
  • Brown, T. C., & Latham, G. P. (2000). The effects of goal setting and self-instruction training on the performance of unionized employees. Industrial Relations, 55, 80-94.
  • Cervone, D., Jiwani, N., & Wood R. (1991). Goal setting and the differential influence of self-Regulatory processes on complex decision-making performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 257-266.
  • DeShon, R, P., & Alexander, R. A. (1996). Goal setting effects on implicit and explicit learning of complex tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(1), 18-36.
  • Fan, J., Meng H., Bilings, R. S., Litchfield, R. C., & Kaplan, I. (2008). On the role of goal orientation traits and self-efficacy in the goal-setting process: Distinctions that make a difference. Human Performance, 21, 354-382.
  • Kitsantas, A., Reiser, R. A., & Doster, J. (2004). Developing self-regulated learners: goal setting, self-evaluation, and organizational signals during acquisition of procedural skills. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(4), 269-287.
  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2006). Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting: Effects on self-regulatory processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 900-916.
  • Latham, G. P., Gerard Seijts, & Dan Crim. (2008). The effects of learning goal difficulty level and cognitive ability on performance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 40(4), 220-229.
  • Lay, C. H. & Schouwenburg, H. C. (1993). Trait procrastination, time management, and academic behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8(4), 647-662.
  • Locke, E. A., Chah, D., Harrison, S., & Lustgarten, N. (1989). Separating the effects of goal specificity from goal level. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(2), 270–287.
  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hill.
  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 265-268.
  • Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Sarri, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1989). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90(10), 125-152.
  • Macan, T. H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Phillips, A. P. (1990). College students’ time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 760-768.
  • Morisano, D., Hirsh, J. B., Peterson, J. B., & Pihl, R. O. & Shore, B. M. (2010). Setting, elaborating, and reflecting on personal goals improves academic performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 255-264.
  • Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (1997). Rome of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 792-802.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407.
  • Pintrich, P., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Predictive validity and reliability of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire(MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
  • Ridley, D. S., Schutz, P. A., Glanz, R. S., & Weinstein, C. E. (1992). Self-regulated learning: the Interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 293-306.
  • Rozencwajg, P., & Fenouillet, F. (2012). Effect of goal setting on the strategies used to solve a block design task. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 530-536.
  • Ruth, W. J. (1996). Goal setting and behavior contracting for students with emotional and behavioral difficulties: Analysis of daily, weekly, and total goal attainment. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 153-158.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1983). Developing children's self-efficacy and skills: The roles of social comparative information and goal setting. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 76-86.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Goal setting and self-evaluation: A social cognitive perspective on self-regulation. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 7, 85-113.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.
  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and application. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), An essential dimension of self-regulated learning(pp.267-295). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2011). The effect of commitment to a learning goal, self-efficacy, and the interaction between learning goal difficulty and commitment on performance in a business simulation. Human Performance, 24, 189-204.
  • Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quint essential self-regulatory failure. Psychological bulletin, 133(1), 65-94.
  • Vieira, E.T., Jr., & Grantham, S. (2011). University students setting goals in the context of autonomy, self-efficacy and important goal-related task engagement. Educational Psychology, 31(2), 141-156.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., (2003). Becoming a self-regulated academic learning. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70
구매하기 (5,900)
장바구니