The goal of this paper is to enhance understanding of the academic Discipline Evaluation practice and to seek for a way to develop the evaluation systems by comparing and analyzing the academic discipline evaluation systems among independent non-governmental organizations in Korea. This paper covers eight academic disciplines - engineering, medical, oriental medical, nursing, dental, business administration, commerce and trade, and architect. I researched the current state of evaluation of those disciplines with such topics as principal agent, aim, subject, criteria, procedure, and use of the outcome. The conclusion can be summarized as follows. First, principal agents are independent non-governmental organizations. We need to establish the organization which accredit the evaluation organizations. Second, the aim of the evaluation is to improve program quality and education. Accrediting procedure and criteria should be adjusted to enhance the quality of program substantially. Third, the evaluation is not mandatory but voluntary, the evaluation fee is being paid by the individual program. Government should support the financial support. Fourth, every independent non-governmental organizations should seek for the ways to improve reviewers' qualification because the evaluation is conducted on the basis of the subjective evaluation and emphasizes the outcomes more than the input. Fifth, it takes too much time to review program's self-study report and have on-site visit. Also there is a problem how to guarantee the objectivity in evaluation with limited pool of evaluators. Sixth, the outcome of the evaluation is divided by 'accredited' and 'not accredited', which can be open to the many kinds of consumers. However, the accrediting organizations need to make effort to give substantial benefits to the students and the programs.