기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
A Linguistic Approach to the Alternation of the Two Korean ‘Gratitude' Expressions: Kamsahapnita and Komapsupnita
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • A Linguistic Approach to the Alternation of the Two Korean ‘Gratitude' Expressions: Kamsahapnita and Komapsupnita
저자명
Heisoon Yang
간행물명
Eastwest Education
권/호정보
2006년|23권 (통권23호)|pp.75-87 (13 pages)
발행정보
이화여자대학교 교과교육연구소|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트(0.34MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

영문초록

The purpose of this study is to examine syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic features of the two typical and basic ‘gratitude’ expressions of the Korean language, kamsahapnita and komapsupnita, and then investigate linguistically significant differences between these two expressions. For this purpose, authentic data have been collected and analyzed in terms of linguistic concepts. A general assumption about kamsahapnita and komapsupnita among both native and nonnative speakers of Korean is that these two expressions are simply interchangeable, the only difference, if any, being that kamsahapnita is more formal and polite than komapsupnita. This study, however, found that such an pragmatic/stylistic approach to the choice between the two expressions of ‘gratitude’ is far from being sufficient in accounting for the acceptability of each of the two expressions. The data collected for this study showed morphological, syntactic, and semantic differences between the two expressions, kamsahata and komapta. The study findings are the following: (1) kamsahapnita is an dynamic/event verb, whereas komapsupnita is a stative, psyche adjective; and (2) komapsupnita has Theme or Experiencer as the subject, whereas kamsahapnita has Agent as the subject. Thus, the choice between the two expressions of ‘gratitude’ is determined by linguistic competence, implicit or explicit, rather than by pragmatic competence. These findings are expected to contribute to the achievement of adult KSL/KFL learners, who are mostly known to benefit more from explicit knowledge than from implicit knowledge about the target language.

목차

I. Introduction
II. Verb and Adjective as Predicates in Korean
III. Linguistic Status of Kamsahata and Komapta
IV. Conclusions
References

구매하기 (4,200)