- 한국.만주.몽골의 창세신화 변천의 의미
- The Mythological Meaning of Transformation in Creation Myths of Korea, Manchu, and Mongol
- ㆍ 저자명
- 박종성
- ㆍ 간행물명
- 구비문학연구KCI
- ㆍ 권/호정보
- 2000년|11호(통권11호)|pp.63-105 (43 pages)
- ㆍ 발행정보
- 한국구비문학회|한국
- ㆍ 파일정보
- 정기간행물|KOR| PDF텍스트(0.63MB)
- ㆍ 주제분야
- 인문학
한국과 만주․몽골은 빈번한 교섭을 통하여 역사적·문화적으로 공유할 수 있는 측면을 많이 가지고 있다고 생각된다. 한 예로, 1117년 여진의 아골타가 고려에 보낸 국서 가운데에 “高麗爲父母之邦(高麗史, 睿宗 12年 3月)”의 기록이나 金王朝가 宋王朝와 국가 정통 논쟁을 벌일 때, 張行信이 “按始祖實錄止稱自高麗而來 未聞出於高辛(金史, 張行信傳)”이라 말한 사실은 滿族이 고구려에 대해 느끼는 심정적 일체감을 보여주는 것이라 할 수 있다.
This study aims to examine the diverging aspects of the God of Creation\'s role in Creation myth, based on the analysis of the transmitting aspects of mytheme in Creation myths of Korea, Manchu, and Mongol. The main result of mytheme analysis indicates that the Highest God of Creation were diverged into the God of Creation in a higher grade, God of Creation in a lower grade, God competing for the rule of the mortal world, and removed God and the role was also divided accordingly. In such a divergence, the change from the highest God of Creation to the father God of human hero provides a significant axis in the transition of Creation myth.
The transition of Creation myth includes the changing course from the female God to the male God Considering the transition from Abka hehe to Abka eonduri etc, respectively, the transitional course is evident in Manchurian myth, but not in Korean myth. It can be assumed that Mongolian myth is somewhere between them. In the myth in which the Highest God of Creation does not play an active role or disappears from the outset, Sokka and Miruk or Maidar confronting Shibegeni play roles inheriting the male God of Creation\'s divinity. This fact implies that the transitional aspect in the character change of the God of Creation, even though it is unclear where God in the next generation is the male God or female God.
Three aspects such as
1. 서언 2. 자료의 소개 3. 創世神話의 개별적 검토 4. 한,滿,蒙 創世神話의 변천의 포괄적 검토 5. 결론