The primary goal of the translation procedure is appropriate for the different groups in another language. Thus, it is a challenge to produce such questionnaires while maintaining equivalency with English language version. In translating, it is important to distinguish between technical and conceptual equivalence. Technical equivalence is about grammar and syntax. Meanwhile, conceptual equivalence is about the absence of conceptual differences between two versions of an instrument, which includes item and scalar equivalence of the source and translated researches. Another important concept is cultural proficiency, which refers to the requirement that the translated instrument adequately reflect the cultural assumptions, norms, values, and expectations of the target population. Especially, etic concept which is universal or common meaning across cultures and emic concept which group specific constructs or ideas are key factors to be considered. Bullinger et al., (1998) proposed a framework, in which translation, forward-translation, back-translation, independent review and comparison, review by committee, qualitative analysis, focus groups, cognitive interviews and readability assessment, and field test and psychometric analyses. This paper will discuss about those factors when a physical education or movement science researcher tries to translate a English version questionnaire into Korean.