기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
안정그룹 애착이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향:영향력 인지의 매개효과를 중심으로
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 안정그룹 애착이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향:영향력 인지의 매개효과를 중심으로
  • A Study on the Effect of Group Attachment Security on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Mediation Effect of Sense of Power
저자명
권정언,권상집
간행물명
Andragogy TodayKCI
권/호정보
2015년|18권 1호(통권66호)|pp.103-127 (25 pages)
발행정보
한국성인교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.72MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

조직 경쟁력의 요소로 상호 협력하는 조직시민행동(OCB)이 떠오르며 이를 증진시킬 방안에 대한 관심이 고조되어 왔다. 본 연구는 조직 내 안정그룹 애착을 형성한 구성원들이 타인에게 행사할 수 있는 자신의 영향력에 대한 지각을 높여, 자신이 맡은 과업뿐 아니라 조직 내 다른 구성원에 대해 헌신할 수 있으리라는 가설을 세우고 시작되었다. 연구대상은 대학생 140명을 두 집단으로 나누어 실험집단에는 안정그룹 애착과 관련된 조건을, 통제집단에는 일상적인 조건을 부여한 후, 영향력 인지와 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향을 확인하였다. 실험연구 결과, 안정그룹 애착을 형성한 집단은 그렇지 않은 집단에 비해 더 높은 자신의 영향력을 인지했고 이를 바탕으로 조직시민행동에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 안정그룹 애착이 영향력 인지라는 매개변인을 통해 조직시민행동에 미치는 긍정적인 메커니즘을 확인함으로써 기존 그룹애착 이론의 연구 영역을 확대하는데 기여하였다. 그리고 구성원들의 영향력을 높이는 방안, 상호 협력을 증진시킬 수 있는 요소가 서로 존중하고 심리적 안정감과 유대감을 강조할 수 있는 문화 형성에 있음을 실증적으로 보여줌으로써 조직개발과 성인교육에도 실무적 시사점을 제시하였다.

영문초록

The purpose of this study is to investigate how group attachment security impacts organizational citizenship behavior through individual sense of power. To strengthen causal relationships and rule out alternative explanations, we conducted an experiment based on university students. We collected data from 140 students in a university. Participants were randomly assigned to either the secure group attachment or control conditions. In our study, we find that (1) the securely group attachment was positively related to individual sense of power than control conditions, which in turn positively influenced organizational citizenship behavior. (2) In addition, individual sense of power fully mediated the relationship between group attachment security and organizational citizenship behavior. This study expands literature about group attachment, sense of power, and OCB. The key contribution lies in introducing sense of power as a primary mediator of the effect of securely group attachment on OCB. Also, our research indicates that many organizations could train managers to develop levels of flexible culture and to support communications. We discuss further academic and practical implications for understanding how secure group attachment affects OCB through individual sense of power.

목차

Ⅰ. 서  론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 가설
Ⅲ. 연구모형과 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 결  론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (91건)

  • 권상집, 백서인, 김희태, 장현준, 김성진 (2013). 기업가적 의지, 조직학습, 기술/시장 변화에 의한 대학발 창업 벤처기업의 기회실현 과정: i-KAIST 탐색적 사례연구. 지식경영연구, 14(5), 55-79.
  • 권정언, 권상집 (2014). 안정그룹 애착이 개인 창의성에 미치는 영향: 자아 효능감의 매개효과. 지식경영연구, 15(2), 43-66.
  • 김성환, 최은수 (2012). 공공기관의 변혁적 리더십, 전략적 인적자원개발, 학습조직 구축, 조직시민행동 간의 구조적 관계. Andragogy Today, 15(3), 63-90.
  • 삼성경제연구소 (2012). 기업 내의 조직창의성 모델. Seri 연구보고서.
  • 오신호, 한상연, 배성주 (2013). 기업의 재무적 성과 향상을 위한 제품혁신 메커니즘 분석: 공정혁신, 조직혁신, 마케팅혁신의 조절효과를 중심으로. 기술혁신학회지, 16(4), 1006-1031.
  • 정기수 (2003). 변혁적 리더십과 리더-부하 관계가 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향: 대기업 산업교육 지도자의 리더십을 중심으로. Andragogy Today, 6(2), 21-47.
  • 지성구, 최선규 (2013). 조직 내 심리적 조건이 창의적 업무몰입에 미치는 영향: 예상되는 이미지 결과의 매개효과. 지식경영연구, 14(2), 49-69.
  • Alder, N. E., Epel, E., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological health in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 49, 15-24.
  • Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effect of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgement: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247-260.
  • Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23, 495-516.
  • Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personality sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80, 313-344.
  • Anderson, C., Spataro, S., & Flynn, F. J. (2008). Personality and organizational culture as determinants of influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 702-710.
  • Baccus, J. R., Baldwin, M. W., & Packer, D. J. (2004). Increasing implicit self-esteem through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 15, 498-502.
  • Baldwin, M. W., & Kay, A. C. (2003). Adult attachment and the inhibition of rejection. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 275-293.
  • Baldwin, M. W., Keelan, J. P. R., Fehr, B., Enns, V., & Koh Rangarajoo, E. (1996). Social cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models: Availability and accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
  • Baldwin, M. W., & Main, K. J. (2001). The cued activation of relational schemas in social anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1637-1647.
  • Baldwin, M. W., & Meunier, J. (1999). The cued activation of attachment relational schemas, Social Cognition, 17, 209-227.
  • Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd Ed.) (pp. 154-196). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
  • Beckes, L., Simpson, J. A., & Erickson, A. (2010). Of snakes and succor: Learning secure attachment associations with novel faces via negative stimulus pairings. Psychological Science, 21, 721-728.
  • Boreman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personality selection (pp. 71-98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Sadness and depression. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  • Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver. P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H, C. Triandis & W. W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 2. (pp. 349-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bugental, D. B., Blue, J., & Cruzcosa, M. (1989). Perceived control over caregiving outcomes: Implications for child abuse. Developmental Psychology, 25, 532-539.
  • Bugental. D. B., & Lewis, J. C. (1999). The paradoxical misuse of power by those who see themselves as powerless: How does it happen? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 51-64.
  • Chen, G., Sharma, P. N., Edinger, S. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Farh, J. L. (2011). Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 541-557.
  • Claxton, G. L. (1998). Knowing without knowing why: Investigating human intuition. The Psychologist, 11, 217-220.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd Ed.). Hillsboro, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Copeland, J. T. (1994). Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 264-277.
  • Cowen, E. L. (1952). The influence of varying degrees of psychological stress on problem solving rigidity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 512-519.
  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
  • Dandeneau, S. D., Baldwin, M. W., Baccus, J. R., Sakellaropoulo, M., & Pruessner, J. C. (2007). Cutting stress off at the pass: Reducing vigilance and responsiveness to social threat by manipulating attention. Journal of personality and social psychology, 93, 651-666.
  • De Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 285-298.
  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739-756.
  • Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327-1343.
  • Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105-123.
  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-41.
  • Fraley, R. C., Niedenthal, P. M., Marks, M., Brumbaugh, C., & Vicary, A. (2006). Adult attachment and the perception of emotional expressions: Probing the hyperactivating strategies underlying anxious attachment. Journal of Personality, 74, 1163-1190.
  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 35-365.
  • Geller, D., & Bamberger, P. (2009). Bringing avoidance and anxiety to the job: Attachment style and instrumental helping behavior among coworkers. Human Relations, 62, 1803-1827.
  • George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310-329.
  • Goldhamer, H., & Shils, E. A. (1939). Types of power and status. American Journal of Sociology, 45, 171-182.
  • Harrison, D., & Klein, K. (2007). What's the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 9, 1199-1228.
  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualization as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1990). Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 270-280.
  • Holey, R. H., & Smith, G. T. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 429-440.
  • Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128-1145.
  • Jong, A. D., Song, M., & Song, L. Z. (2013). How lead founder personality affects new venture performance: The mediating role of team conflict. Journal of Management, 39, 1825-1854.
  • Isen, A. M., & Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive affect as a factor in organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 13. (pp. 1-53). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
  • King, N., Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (1991). Organizational innovation: A case study into perceptions and processes. Work and Stress, 5, 331-339.
  • Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personalty and Social Psychology, 68, 518-530.
  • Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131-142.
  • Lee, S. (2005). The ingroup secure base: An attachment exploration model of intergroup relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • Lee, S., & Ling, L. (2007). Understanding affectional ties to groups from the perspective of attachment theory. M. Neale, E. A. Mannix, & C. Anderson (Eds.), Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 10, (pp. 217-248). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Press.
  • Lee, S., & Thompson, L. (2011). Do agents negotiate for the best (or worst) interest of principles? Secure, anxious, and avoidant principal-agent attachment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 681-684.
  • Liu, W., Friedman, R., & Hong, Y. Y. (2012). Culture and accountability in negotiation: Recognizing the importance of in-group relations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 221-234.
  • Marmot, M. (2004). The status syndrome: How social standing affects our health and longevity. New York, NY: Holt.
  • Martin, H., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2006). Team reflexivity in innovative projects. R&D Management, 36, 113-125.
  • Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1372-1395.
  • McNeely, B. L., & Meglino, B. M. (1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 836-844.
  • Mikulincer, M., & Arad, D. (1999). Attachment working models and cognitive openness in close relationships: A test of chronic and temporary accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 710-725.
  • Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1998). The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional and cognitive reactions to stressful events. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 143-165). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: Exploring the attachment-related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events. Personnel Relationships, 12, 149-168.
  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705-750.
  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 38, 242-266.
  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634.
  • Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In. L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 43-72). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior. It’s construct clean-up time. Human Resource, 10, 85-97.
  • Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802.
  • Richards, D. A., & Schat, A. C. H. (2011). Attachment at (not to) work: Applying attachment theory to explain individual behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 169-182.
  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multi-dimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555-572.
  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1997). Workplace deviance: Its definition, its manifestations, and its causes. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & R. J. Bies (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 7, pp. 3-27). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Rom, E., & Mikulincer, M. (2003). Attachment theory and group processes: The association between attachment style and group-related representations, goals, memories, and functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1220-1235.
  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovator behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
  • Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483-503.
  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
  • Simons, T., & Peterson, R. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102-111.
  • Smith, E. R., Murphy, J., & Coats, S. (1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 94-110.
  • Smith, E. R., Coats. S., & Murphy, J. (2001). The self and attachment to relationship partners and groups. In C. Sedikides & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, and collective self (pp. 109-122). Philadelphia, PA: Psychological Press.
  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.
  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148.
  • Tost, L. P., Gino, F., & Larrick, R. P. (2013). When power makes others speechless: The negative impact of leader power on team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1465-1486.
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
  • Wood, R. E., Goodman, J. S., Beckmann, N., & Cook, A. (2008). Mediation testing in management research: A review and proposals. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 270-295.
구매하기 (5,400)
추천 연관논문