Cultural Content Industry is one of the newly prospering industries in which IT plays a crucial role, prospected to have a worldwide growth. Korea has the best information infra system while having a very weak basis of domestic digital contents distributed in ultra speed information network. As for now, the distribution of cultural contents are not being active due to illegal copies and negative utilization, which leads to the lack of industrial basis. Cultural Content is a digital good with education, culture, economy and health care in one combined and its production and formation should be backed up by active support of the government. Furthermore, it is highly probable that the technology to process cultural contents becomes the nation s strategic industry field in the 21th century. However, the effort to support cultural contents is lopsided mainly to its formation while proper and active distribution have lost its place to stand. Therefore, legal institutions are needed to prevent cultural contents from illegal copy and not permitted usages, which will eventually lead to the protection and support for cultural contents. There also needs to be an inspection and amendment of related law in order to enhance efficient protection of right and dispute settlement. In the case of Korea as well, maintenance of related laws on cultural contents should be accomplished, thus contributing to the sound economic development. Exclusive right granting methods such as Property right act or illegal competition prevention act could be considered as one of the means and this includes the intention that cultural content should not prevented from reasonable access and quick distribution. When Exclusive right granting method comes to action, possibility of the producer to collect his or her investment cost back becomes higher while causing the decrease in the fair usage of cultural contents, ultimately having a negative effect on the activation of digital content industry. That means, in case one grants a trite publicBD an exclusive right, consumers are to use the contents only through signing a contract with producer on the permission of usage. This might not only undermine reasonable access and utilization of information but also go against the development of cultural contents by hindering quick distribution. This Act includes several problems in its operation which are hard to solve and since it is an Act of unfair Competition Protection unlike property right law system, a more deliberate and concrete study on its improvement is needed as a legal systematic approach toward cultural contents protection.