The purpose of this study was to examine differences of trust and attitude toward professional sports involved in match fixing cases and to test the effect on consumers’ behavioral intentions. Further, it attempted to provide fundamental data for managerial and legal discussion and potential action. Utilizing an online survey, this study collected data, in April 2013, from 372 participants who were identified by snowball sampling. The results suggested that there were significant differences in levels of trust depending on the types of match fixing cases; particularly, the effect of match fixing cases committed by coaching staffs was greater than those committed by individual athletes. Moreover, trust levels diminished from match fixing cases significantly influenced consumers’ behavioral intentions. Based on these results, suggestions regarding marketing and legal implications are discussed.