Korea Copyright Act provides Special Provisions concerning cinematographic works which shall be presumed to allow movie producers to be authorized the rights necessary for making a film and exploitation, unless otherwise stipulated. The Article 99 stipulates that copyright holders of the preexisting work shall be presumed to allow a movie producer to use the rights necessary for making a film and exploitation, unless otherwise stipulated. Movie producers was considered to be available to use every right for making a film and exploitation if they get once a permission, however, in 2010, KOMCA(Korea Music Copyright Association) changed collecting regulations to collect performance fees separately. The case at issue is about whether section 99 may be applied to the music regarding music used in the movie. KOMCA argued that cinematization means only derivation of a preexisting work, but it does not include the exploitation without changing the work like a piece of music. However, the court ruled that cinematization means not only derivation of the preexisting work but also it includes the exploitation like BGM. The ruling of the Supreme Court is so meaningful in terms of those Special Provisions concerning cinematographic works being applied to music. However, the cinematization provided in article 99 omits reproduction which looks a legislative loophole. This article review the meaning of Special Provisions concerning cinematographic works through the annotation of the Supreme Case at issue.