- 한국판 ENRICH 결혼만족 검사의 타당화 연구
- The Validation Study of K-ENRICH Inventory
- ㆍ 저자명
- 김덕일, 박재우, 송원영, 이지연
- ㆍ 간행물명
- 한국기독교상담학회지KCI
- ㆍ 권/호정보
- 2009년|17권 1호(통권17호)|pp.11-34 (24 pages)
- ㆍ 발행정보
- 한국기독교상담심리학회|한국
- ㆍ 파일정보
- 정기간행물|KOR| PDF텍스트(0.31MB)
- ㆍ 주제분야
- 종교
This study is to validate K-ENRICH inventory. Total 1058 married couples’data was analyzed. According to the results, internal consistencies of K-ENRICH subscales were ranged from .68 to .90 and the coefficients of temporal stability(test-retest) ranged from .57 to .89. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that K-ENRICH was consisted of 10 factors. Model fit indices were acceptable(RMSEA=.065, TLI=.90, and CFI=.92). Correlations between FACES-III(Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale 3rd Ed.) and 10 subscales of K-ENRICH were ranged .57-.85. And discriminant analysis, which has done for assessing discriminant validity, showed that PCA(Positive Couple Agreement) scores could discern the maritally satisfied group from maritally dissatisfied group with 95.8% accuracy. Overall, results suggested a high internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity. The meaning of the results, suggestions for further study, and limitations of this study were discussed.
This study is to validate K-ENRICH inventory. Total 1058 married couples’data was analyzed. According to the results, internal consistencies of K-ENRICH subscales were ranged from .68 to .90 and the coefficients of temporal stability(test-retest) ranged from .57 to .89. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that K-ENRICH was consisted of 10 factors. Model fit indices were acceptable(RMSEA=.065, TLI=.90, and CFI=.92). Correlations between FACES-III(Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale 3rd Ed.) and 10 subscales of K-ENRICH were ranged .57-.85. And discriminant analysis, which has done for assessing discriminant validity, showed that PCA(Positive Couple Agreement) scores could discern the maritally satisfied group from maritally dissatisfied group with 95.8% accuracy. Overall, results suggested a high internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity. The meaning of the results, suggestions for further study, and limitations of this study were discussed.
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 방법 Ⅲ. 결과 Ⅳ. 논의 참고문헌