Refuting analytic Kantianism, P. Kitcher denies Kant and Wittgenstein's philosophical intimacy on the thinking subject. Kitcher understands that Kant's transcendental psychology is the naturalistic, cognitive theoretical analysis. I criticize Kitcher's claims as following. (i) Kant's thinking subject is not the phenomenal self. Rather it is the system of language and concepts. (ii) Kitcher claims that Kant and Wittgenstein's concept of logic is different. But, the logic which Kant and Wittgenstein insist is the transcendental logic. (iii) W. Sellars expresses the space of transcendental logic by ought-to-be rules. Furthermore, Sellars asserts that thought is analogical extension of language. (iv) The Normativity of language and concepts is not reduced by casual explanation. Also, non-representaive sense experience is impossible. Therefore, Kant and Wittgenstein show the philosophical intimacy on the thinking subject.