- 표제유형이 교재학습에 미치는 효과
- Effects of Types of Headings on Text Learning
- ㆍ 저자명
- 文善模,李仁源
- ㆍ 간행물명
- 교육학연구KCI
- ㆍ 권/호정보
- 1993년|31권 3호(통권73호)|pp.55-69 (15 pages)
- ㆍ 발행정보
- 한국교육학회|한국
- ㆍ 파일정보
- 정기간행물|KOR| 이미지(6.17MB)
- ㆍ 주제분야
- 교육학
본 연구는 국민학생들을 피험자로 하여 어떤 주제에 대해 설명한 친숙하지 않은 글에 제시하는 표제유형이 그 교재학습에 미치는 효과를 살펴 본 것이다. 그 결과 교재의 실제 내용이 제시되기 이전에 단락의 중심내용 혹은 내용들간의 관계를 알리는 진술문으로 된 표제유형으로서 해당 단락의 바로 앞에 제시되는 내표제 또는 해당 단락의 왼쪽 가장자리에 제시되는 외표제는 아무런 표제도 제시되지 않는 무표제에 비해 교재학습을 촉진시켰다. 그리고 이러한 효과는 학업성적 수준 또는 검사문항 수준에 관계없는 것으로 나타났다.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of types of headings on text learning. The main hypotheses to be tested were as follows: (1) There will be a significant difference in text learning between types of headings (embedded, marginal, control). (2) There will be a significant interaction effect in text learning between types of headings and levels of academic achievement (high vs low). (3) There will be a significant interaction effect in text learning between types of heading and levels of test item(high vs low). Subjects of this study were 120 elementary school students (sixth grade) selected randomly on the basis of levels of student's acadmic achievement. And they were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions. The stimulus materials were expository text used by Moon, Seon-Mo and Kim, Young-Seon(1989). It was expository text about "Jupiter is a examiner of Life" and unlearned contents at sixth grade. Each text was consisted of 5 passages and about 2500 words with embedded headings or marginal headings. Testing materials were consisted of 10 items (5 passages x 2 items) of knowledge level and 10 items of conprehension level. To test the hypotheses, 3(heading types: embedded, marginal, control) x 2(academic achievement levels : high vs low) x (2)(test item levels : high vs low) ANONA was applied for text learning. The main findings of the study were as follows : (1) There was a significant main effect of types of headings on text learning. Embedded headings and marginal headings showed higher scores than control condition, and marginal headings showed higher scores than embedded headings. (2) There was no significant interaction effect between types of headings and levels of academic achievement on text learning. (3) There was no significant interaction of effect between types of headings and testing levels of item on text learning.
요 약 Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 Ⅲ. 연구 방법 Ⅳ. 결 과 Ⅴ. 고 찰 Ⅵ. 결 론 <참고문헌> Abstract