The Chinese museums, centering round the churches of cities in Chinese coastal area, have been established by western missionaries since the middle of 19th century. The first modern museum was built by Chang-Gun in 1905. Though the situation in China has been chaotic-which means ceaseless repetition of revolutions, military dictatorships and internal wars between democrats and communists, more and more museums were built nonetheless and the quality (as well as the number) of the museums increased dramatically after the foundation of 'People's Republic of China.' Especially, after they reformed their political system and accepted the open-economy policy, the Chinese began to see their museums as parts of the important national enterprises and felt the need to increase the number of professional personnel who can manage the museums and research the archaeology. So several Chinese universities have set up the departments of archaeo-museology and successfully brought up the professional personnel for digging historical sites and managing museums. There are now fourteen universities in China which have the departments of archaeo-museology that contribute to cultivating the professionals in the related fields. In these days, the Chinese universities, however, are facing new challenges-most of which result from the lack of training expenses, the change of educational concepts, and restructuring of school management. And only 29 universities have the museums that are officially registered to the 'Professional Committee of Chinese High-school Museums,' though there are more than 50 museums since they began to found the university museums in 1949. Most of university museums in China reach no more than the level for displaying referential resources and do not open their doors except on some special occasions. Moreover, due to the difficulty of adopting membership system and charging admission fee (which can be effective ways to solve the problem of lack of expenses) and the increased number of historical museums in local areas, the university museums can not overpass their limitations to fulfill their functions in the right way. And it's no exaggeration to say that this ongoing situation in the Chinese university museums applies to that of Korean ones exactly in the same way. Based on this, it seems to be rational enough to assert that the university museums have to be set up in accordance with the foundational ideology of respective schools and their features. It also seems to be fair to say that those museums, by concentrating on managing and researching with the other professionals in the related fields of studies and aggressively developing new lectures & courses for studying local cultures, have to try hard to decrease their sizes but increase their effectiveness. They, moreover, have to employ the appropriate professionals who can manage their collection efficiently and exert themselves intensively to study the museology. They also need to make their efforts to manage their collection by using modern science and technology. More important thing than the all of the efforts mentioned above is, that they should actively participate in the cultural events of their schools and concentrate on the research & development of archeo-museology. It's also important that they have to play the role of cultural bridge between the masses and the professional scholars by displaying their conspicuous research achievements and conveying the basic knowledge of history to the public.