기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
초등 과학영재와 일반학생의 오프라인 학습자 특성 및 온라인 학습태도의 수준과 구조적 관계 비교: 학교태도, 자기조절학습 및 학습흥미를 중심으로
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 초등 과학영재와 일반학생의 오프라인 학습자 특성 및 온라인 학습태도의 수준과 구조적 관계 비교: 학교태도, 자기조절학습 및 학습흥미를 중심으로
  • A Comparison of the science gifted and regular elementary students in levels of and structural relation between offline learning characteristics and online learning attitude: focusing on school attitude, self-regulated learning and learning interest
저자명
이현주
간행물명
교육학연구KCI
권/호정보
2014년|52권 1호(통권161호)|pp.303-331 (29 pages)
발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(1.24MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구의 목적은 초등 과학영재의 오프라인 학습자특성(학교태도, 자기조절학습, 학습흥미)이 온라 인 학습태도에 미치는 영향을 확인하고 이러한 변인간의 관계와 수준을 일반학생과 비교하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 총 484명의 초등 4-6학년에 재학 중인 과학영재 및 일반학생의 자료를 Hotelling's T-Square 검증과 다집단 구조방정식을 사용하여 분석하였다. 연구결과, 영재학생은 일반학생에 비하 여 교사에 대한 태도를 제외한 학교태도(학교공부, 교우), 자기조절학습, 학습흥미(창의, 탐구, 사고)뿐 아니라 온라인 학습태도가 모두 보다 긍정적인 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 학교태도, 자기조절학습, 학습 흥미, 온라인 학습태도 간의 인과관계의 방향과 크기에서는 영재 및 일반학생 간의 차이가 발견되지 않았다. 영재 및 일반학생 모두 학교공부와 교우에 대한 태도는 자기조절학습 및 학습흥미에 직접적 인 정적 영향을 미쳤고, 자기조절학습 및 학습흥미는 다시 온라인 학습태도에 정적 영향을 미쳤다. 교 사에 대한 태도는 자기조절학습 및 학습흥미에 직접적으로 유의한 영향을 주지 않았고 온라인 학습태 도에는 정적 영향을 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 요약하면, 온라인 학습태도에 대하여 학교공부와 교우에 대한 태도는 정적인 간접 및 총영향을, 교사에 대한 태도는 직접 및 총영향을 가지는 것으로 나타났 다. 마지막으로, 본 연구 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구가 교육현장에 대하여 가지는 시사점을 논의하였다.

영문초록

The purpose of the study was to examine how students’ offline learning characteristics (attitude toward school, self-regulated learning, and learning interests) affect their attitudes toward online leaning by focusing on comparison of the science gifted and regular students as well as their differences in the mean levels of these variables. The data of the 484 fourth to sixth students was analyzed with the method of Hotelling's T-Square test and multi-group structural equation modeling. The results of the study showed that the gifted students had more positive attitude toward school(learning in school, peers) and online learning (interaction, self-direction), and higher level of self-regulation, learning interests (creation, investigation, thinking) than regular students. Across the gifted and regular students, the results showed positive direct effects of the attitude toward school learning and peers on self-regulation and learning interests which affected online learning attitudes. Students’ attitude toward teachers did not directly affect self-regulation and learning interests but had positive effect on online learning attitudes. In sum, the attitudes towards school had positive total effects on online learning attitude.

목차

I. 서 론
II. 연구방법
III. 연구결과
IV. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (64건)

  • 김미영(2013). 고등학생 학생들의 자기조절 학습능력 비교. 실과교육연구, 19(2), 289-311. (Translated in English) Kim, M.Y. (2013). A Comparison of Self Regulated Learning Ability of High Schoolers. J ournal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(2), 289-311.
  • 김성연·한기순(2011). 영재학생의 자기조절학습전략에 영향을 미치는 개인, 가정 및 교사요인 탐색. 청소년학연구, 18(12), 299-328. (Translated in English) Kim, S.Y., & Han, K.S. (2011). The effects of individual, family, and teacher on gifted students’ self-regulated learning application of Hierarchical
  • 김정환·박용휘(2003). 초등학교 고학년용 자기주도적 학습능력 진단 척도의 타당화, 교육평가연구, 16(1), 183-200. (Translated in English) Kim, J.H., & Pack, Y.H. (2003). Validation of self-directed learning ability diagnostic scale for elementary higher graders. Journal of Educational Evaluation,
  • 박성익·이희연·이경숙(2003). 협동학습 전략이 학업성취와 학습태도에 미치는 효과. 교육학 연구, 41(1), 225-251. (Translated in English) Park, S.I., Lee, H.Y., & Lee, K.S. (2003). The effectiveness of cooperative learning strategies on achievement and attitude in high school geography class. Kore
  • 송영명·이현철·오세희. (2010). 초등학생의 교우관계 변화와 영향요인에 대한 종단적 분석. 초등교육연구, 23(1), 65-86. (Translated in English) Song, Y., Lee, H., & Oh, S. (2010). The longitudinal study on impact factors and change of peer relationship of elementary school students in Korea. The Jour
  • 신영회·김아영(2005). 중학교 영재학생과 일반학생의 학습적 자기조절 동기유형과 실패내성 및 자아존중감간의 관계. 교육과학연구, 35(3), 65-79. (Translated in English) Shin, Y.H., & Kim, A.Y. (2005). Studies on the Relationships among Academic Self-regulation, Failure Tolerance, and Self-esteem in the Middle Sch
  • 신종호·이현주·김용남·김윤근(2006). 수월성 교육 지원을 위한 학습자 특성 반영 e-러닝 모델연구. e-러닝 환경에서 학습자 유형별 e-러닝 서비스 모델 연구. 한국교육학술정보원 (편), (pp. 124-235). 서울: 한국교육학술정보원. (Translated in English) Shin, J., Lee, H., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y.-G. (2006). Classification of gifted leaners based on lear
  • 윤경미·유순화(2011). Holland 이론에 의한 과학영재, 인문사회영재, 일반 중학생의 진로특성 비교. 중등교육연구, 59(4), 1001-1029. (Translated in English) Yun, K.M., & Yoo, S.H. (2011). A comparison of career patterns among the gifted in science, the gifted in human and social science and average mi
  • 윤자룡·김연진·남승권·최완식(2012). e-러닝 환경에서 영재학생과 일반학생의 학습행동양식에 관한 연구. 대한공업교육학회지, 37(1), 107-124. (Translated in English) Yin, Z.L., Kim, Y.J., Nam, S.K., & Choi, W.K. (2012). A survey study on learning behavioral styles of gifted students and ordinary students in e-
  • 이규녀·최완식(2007). e-러닝에서 학습참여도와 만족도에 영향을 미치는 자기조절학습 요소 연구. 한국기술교육학회지, 7(3), 210-223. (Translated in English) Lee, K.N., & Choi, W.S. (2007). A study on the self-regulated learning factors affecting participation, satisfaction in e-learning. Journal of Korean
  • 이미순·조영란(2012). 초등 영재와 일반 학생의 탄력성 및 학교 태도 관계 연구. 초등교육연구, 25(3), 159-180. (Translated in English) Lee, M.S., & Cho, Y.R. (2012). A study on relations between resilience and school attitude of elementary gifted and general students. J ournal of Elementary Edu
  • 이성일(2012). 온라인교육에서 구조변수, 학습자의 학습동기, 학습만족도 간의 구조적 관계 분석. 교육정보미디어연구, 18(1), 77-94. (Translated in English) Lee, S.I. (2012). The structural relationship among structure variabl, learning motivation, learning satisfaction in online education. The J ournal of
  • 이은준 (2012). 온라인 수업의 장애요인에 대한 학습자의 인식의 변화와 유형에 따른 군집화 연구. 교육공학연구, 28(3), 559-585. (Translated in English) Lee, E. J. (2012). Clustering the learner's changes and patterns of perception on obstacles to online course. J ournal of Educational Technology, 28(3)
  • 이현주·함은혜·이유경(2013). The effect of parental supporting styles on student academic motivations over years. 제7회 한국교육 종단연구 학술대회논문집 (pp. 631-658). 서울: 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Lee, H., Ham, E. H., & Lee, Y.-k. (2013). The effect of parental supporting st
  • 임채희, 김성회(2009). 중학생용 학교태도 척도 개발. 상담학연구, 10(2), 1165-1180. (Translated in English) Lim, C.-H. & Kim S.-H. (2009). The development of scales to measure junior school children's attitudes. The Korean J ournal of Counseling, 10(2), 1165-1180.
  • 조붕환(2004). 초등학생용 학습흥미검사의 표준화를 위한 연구. 초등교육연구, 17(2), 227-252. (Translated in English) Cho, B.-H. (2004). A study on standardization of learning interest inventory for elementary school children. The J ournal of Elemeantary Education, 17(2), 227-252.
  • Abrahamson, C. E. (1998). Issues in interactive communication in distance education. College Student J ournal, 32(1), 33-43.
  • Allport, G. W. (1968). Personality: Contemporary viewpoints (I). In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 12, pp. 1-5). New York: The Macmillan company and The Free Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Barker Lunn, J. C. (1969). The development of scales to measure junior school children's attitudes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 39(1), 64-71.
  • Benito, Y. (2000). Metacognitive ability and cognitive strategies to solve maths and transformation problems. Gifted Education International. 14(2), 151-159.
  • Burge, E. (1993). Adult distance learning: Challenges for contemporary practice. In T. Barer-Stein and J. A. Draper (Eds.) The craft of teaching adults (pp.215-230). Toronto, Ontario: Culture Concepts.
  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
  • Cascallar, E., Boekaerts, M., & Costigan, T. (2006). Assessment in the Evaluation of Self-Regulation as a Process Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 297-306
  • Chan, D. (2001). Learning styles of gifted and nongifted secondary students in Hong Kong. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(1), 35-44.
  • Colangelo, N. & Kelly, K. R. (1983). A study of student, parent, and teacher attitudes toward gifted programs and gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27(3), 107-110.
  • Coyl, D. D., Jones, R. M., & Dick, A. J. (2004). The influence of peer status and peer relationships on school-related behaviors, attitudes, and intentions among alternative high school students. American Secondary Education, 32(2), 39-62.
  • Dai, D. Y. (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A., & Cheng, H. (2011). State of Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Survey of Empirical Studies Published During 1998-2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(2), 126-138.
  • Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J.(1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(2), 58-64.
  • Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2014). 영재교육[Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.)]. (이미순, 류지영, 이영주, 이현주, 채유정 역). 서울: 박학사(원전은 2011에 출판).
  • Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1981). Learning style inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage– environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. pp. 13–44). New York: Academic Press.
  • Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2010). Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms (8th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Programs and service at the elementary level. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.). Excellence in educating gifted and talented learners(3rd ed., pp.211-223). Denver: Love.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Garlington, N. K. (1984). An examination of the relationship among a student's self-concept, level of anxiety, and attitude toward school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans, Ann Arbor, New Orleans, USA.
  • Griggs, S. A., & Dunn, R.(1984). Selected case studies of the learning style preferences of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24(3), 115-129.
  • Hare, A. P. & Davies, M. F. (1994). Social interaction. In A. P. Hare, H. H. Blumberg, M. F. Davies, & M. V. Kent(Eds.), Small group research: A handbook (pp. 169-193). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1993). Learning Style Inventory, SLI-IIa. Boston: McBer & Company.
  • Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbanm.
  • Lyman, H. (1998). The promise and problems of English on-line: A primer for high school teachers. English J ournal, 87(1), 56-62.
  • Marjoribanks, K. (2002). Family and school capital: Towards a context theory of students' school outcomes. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
  • McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). The school attitude assessment survey-revised: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(3), 414-429.
  • Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., & Graham, C. R. (2013). Blended learning: Research perspectives (Vol. 2). New York: Routledge.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4) , 385-407.
  • Reichman, S. W., & Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a study learning style scales investment. J ournal of Psychology, 87(2), 213-223.
  • Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373-404). San Di
  • Renzulli, J. S., Rizza, M. G., & Smith, L. S. (2002). Learning Styles Inventory Version 3.0 Technical Manual. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-forming gifted education: Matching the program to the child. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press, Inc.
  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). The role of teachers in facilitating situational interest in an active-learning classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 37-42.
  • Schmuck, R. A., & Schmuck, P. A. (1992). Group processes in the classroom (6th ed.). Debuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Publishers.
  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
  • Seidman, E., Allen, L., Aber, J. L., Mitchell, C., & Feinman, J. (1994). The impact of school transitions in early adolescence on the self-system and social context of poor urban youth. Child Development, 65(2), 507-522.
  • Siegle, D. (2002). Encouraging online bulletin board participation. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 6(1), 120-125.
  • Smahel, D., Brown, B. B., & Blinka, L. (2012). Associations between online friendship and Internet addiction among adolescents and emerging adults. Developmental psychology, 48(2) , 381-388.
  • Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Explorations in giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Terman, L. & Oden, M. (1947). The gifted child grows up. In L. Terman(Ed.), Genetic studies of genius(Vol. 4) . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Verkuyten, M., & Thijs, J. (2002). School satisfaction of elementary school children: The role of performance, peer relations, ethnicity and gender. Social Indicators Research, 59(2), 203-228.
  • Wang, C.-H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302-323.
  • Watters, J. J. (2010). Career decision making among gifted students: The mediation of teachers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 222-238.
  • Worrell, F. C. (2009). What does gifted mean? Personal and social identity perspectives on giftedness in adolescence. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik & D. J. Matthews(Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the lifespan (pp. 131-152). Wash
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulating academic learning and achievement: The emergence of a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 2(2), 173-201.
구매하기 (5,800)
추천 연관논문