기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
QUAL2E 모형을 이용한 하천수질의 위해성평가
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • QUAL2E 모형을 이용한 하천수질의 위해성평가
  • Risk assessment for water quality of a river using QUAL2E model
저자명
김정욱,김연수,강나래,정재원,김수전,노희성,김형수
간행물명
한국습지학회지KCI
권/호정보
2014년|16권 3호(통권48호)|pp.441-450 (10 pages)
발행정보
한국습지학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.76MB)
주제분야
자연과학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구에서는 합리적인 수질관리를 위해서 하천의 자정능력을 고려하여 안성천 유역 내 유해성분 중 ABS(음이온 계면 활성제)성분에 대해서 QUAL2E모형을 이용하여 위해성평가를 실시하였다. 수질모의결과 안성천과 진위천에서 BOD, ABS 의 실측치와 예측치가 비교적 잘 일치함을 보여주고 있으며, DO에 대해서는 예측값과 실측값 사이에 오차가 발생하지만 농도변화의 추이는 잘 나타내고 있었다. 위해성지수는 오염물질의 예상 노출농도(PEC)와 하천수질에 영향을 주지 않는 예상무영향농도(PNEC)를 통해 계산하였고 위해성 비를 산정하여 위해성 지수를 평가하였다. ABS가 하천의 자정작용에 미치는 영향 분석 결과는 안성천[0.0003(Bressan), 0.06(환경부기준)], 진위천[0.0002(Bressan), 0.04(환경부기준)], ABS가 하천 의 수생생태계에 미치는 영향에 대한 분석 결과는 안성천[0.0667(Bressan), 0.005(환경부기준)], 진위천[0.1(Bressan), 0.0075 (환경부기준)]으로 국립환경과학원고시 제2012-30호에서 제시되어 있는 위해성이 있다고 판단되는 위해성 비의 기준치 값 1보다 작아 하천의 자정능력과 하천의 수생생태계에 영향을 주지 않은 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구에서 적용된 방법은 간단하며 현재 환경부 수질기준보다 상세히 유해성분에 대한 정보를 줄 수 있다고 판단된다.

영문초록

In this study, we consider ability of self-purification for a rational water quality management. And we assess the risk of Alkyl Benzene Sulfonic acid sodium salt(ABS) of harmful ingredients in Anseong Cheon watershed using QUAL2E model. The observations and simulated results were fitted well for BOD and ABS, but even though the trend of DO concentration change was well represented, the error between observation and simulation values was existed. We assessed the Risk assessment by calculating Risk quotient(RQ) by Predicted Exposure Concentration(PEC) and Predicted No-Effect Concentration(PNEC). Results of the impact of ABS on the self-purification of the river were Anseongcheon[0.0003(Bressan), 0.06(Criteria of Ministry of environment)], Jinwicheon[0.0002(Bressan), 0.04(Criteria of Ministry of environment). And result of the impact of ABS on the Aquatic ecosystem of the river were Anseongcheon[0.0667(Bressan), 0.005(Criteria of Ministry of environment)], Jinwicheon[0.1(Bressan), 0.0075(Criteria of Ministry of environment). All of these results were smaller than the 1.0 which is the reference value suggested by Norification No.30 of the National Institute of Environment Research. So, ABS did not affect a self-purification and aquatic ecosystem of the river. The method suggested in the study is a simple one and can provide more information for harmful ingredients than criteria of Ministry of environment.

목차

1. 서 론
2. QUAL2E 모형
3. 위해성평가
4. 위해성평가방법
5. 대상지역 및 자료현황
6. QUAL2E 모형의 적용 및 결과
7. 위해성평가
8. 결과 및 고찰
References

참고문헌 (25건)

  • Bressan, M, Brunetti, R, Casellato, S, Fava, GC, Giro, P, Matrin, M, Negriolo, P, Tallandi, L, Thomann, S, Tosoni, M and Turchetto, M(1989). Effects of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate(LAS) on benthic organisms, Tenside Surfactant Detergents, 26(2), pp. 148-158.
  • Cooper, S(2011). A GIS‐Based Water Quality Risk Assessment of Thompson Region Watersheds, Ministry of Environment Thompson Region. EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.(2011). Risk Assessment of Offshore Areas Adjacent to the Proposed Coke Point Dredged Material Containment Facility at Sparrows Point, EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
  • Essex Resion Conservation Authority(2011). Water Quality Risk Assessment(Chapter 4), Essex Resion Conservation Authority.
  • Grand River Conservation Authority(2010). Water Quality Risk Assessment-Source Water Protection-Lake Erie Resion(Chapter 4), Grand River Conservation Authority.
  • Han River Environment Research Center(2000). What is the Development History and Pollution Effect of the Synthetic Detergent?, Han River Environment Research Center. [Korean Literature]
  • Heo, SM, Lee, IJ, Lim, TH, Lim, YK, Cheon, SU and Lee, JG (2012). Monitoring of volatile organic compounds in Nakdong river system and risk assessment, J. of Korean Society for Environmental Analysis, 15(3), pp. 188-196. [Korean Literature]
  • Jang, JH, Yoon CG, Jung, KW and Kim, HC(2006). Application of the QUAL2E model and risk assessment for water quality management in Namyang stream in Hwaong polder, J. of Korean Society of Limnology, 39(1), pp. 110-118. [Korean Literature]
  • Jung, MG, Lee, CK, Oh, GJ, Jang, SI, Gong, IC, Kwon, JH, Kwon, YH, Yoo, HJ, Kim, DW, Lee, NH, Lee, CK, Jo, YJ and Seo, YC(2008). An Introduction to Environment Engineering, DongHwa Technology Publishing, Paju, Korea. [Korean Literature]
  • Korea Environment Institute(2013). Study on the Establishment of Chemical Action Plan for Enhancing the Policy Applicability of Risk Assessment(Ⅰ, Korea Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]
  • Korea Institute of Construction Technology(1990). Study on the Effect of Synthetic Detergent on the Water Treatment Processes, Korea Institute of Construction Technology.
  • Leeuwen C.(1995). Risk Assessment of Chemicals : An Introduction, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Lee JY, Kim, JH, Kim, HK, Choi, JH and Pyo, HS(2008). The risk assessment of 1,4-Dioxane in drinking water sample of Nakdong river, J. of Korean Society of Environmental Toxicology, pp. 85. [Korean Literature]
  • McAvoy, DC, Masscheleyn, P, Peng, C, Morrall, SW, Casilla, AB, Lim, LMU and Gregorio, EG (2003). Risk assessment approach for untreated wastewater using the QUAL2E water quality model, Chemosphere, 52(1), pp. 55-66.
  • Ministry of Construction & Transportation(2002). Basic Plan for River Maintenance of Anseong Choen Water System(Deviation) (Anseongcheon, Jinwichoen, Hwanggujicheon, Osancheon), 11-1500185-000024-14, Ministry of Construction & Transportation [Korean Literature]
  • Ministry of environment(2013). Enforcement Decree of the Framework Act on Environmental Policy, A Presidential Decree No.24203, Ministry of Environment. [Korean Literature]
  • National Institute of Environmental Research(2000). History of Development and Direction in Pollution of Synthetic Detergent, National Institute of Environmental Research. [Korean Literature]
  • National Institute of Environmental Research(1998). Risk Assessment of Environment and Management Method of Development(1), National Institute of Environmental Research. [Korean Literature]
  • National Institute of Environmental Research(2012). Risk Assessment Guidelines of Meterial Selection, Procedure and Method, Norification No.30 of the National Institute of Environment Research. [Korean Literature]
  • Ohe, PC, Dulio, V, Slobodnik, J, Deckere, D, Kuhne, R, Ebert, RU, Ginebreda, A, Cooman, W, Schuumann, G and Brack, W(2011). A new risk assessment approach for the prioritization of 500 classical and emerging organic microcontaminants as potential river basin specific pollutants under the European Water Framework Directive, J. of Science of The Total Environment, 409(11), pp. 2064-2077.
  • Rachael Miller et al.(2009). Risk Assessment for Drinking Water Sources, Research Report 78, Water Quality Research Australia.
  • Ramaswamy, BR, Shanmugam, G, Velu, G, Rengaragan, B and Larsson, H(2011). GC-MS analysis and ecotoxicological risk assessment of triclosan, carbamazepine and parabens in Indian rivers, J. of Hazardous Materials, 186(2-3), pp. 1586-1593.
  • Shin, YR, Yoon CG, Jeon, NJ, and Rhee, HP(2010). Quantitative risk assessment method for metals in water body using WASP, J. of Korean Society on Water Quality, 26(4), pp. 629-636. [Korean Literature]
  • Singh, A, Sharma, RK, Agrawal, M and Marshall, F(2010). Risk assessment of heavy metal toxicity through contaminated vegetables from waste water irrigated area of Varanasi, India, J. of Tropical Ecology, 51(2), pp. 375-387.
  • Suhogusoff, A, Hirata, R and Ferrari, LC(2013). Water quality and risk assessment of dug wells : a case study for a poor community in the city of Sao Paulo. Brazil, J. of Environ Earth Sciences, 68(3), pp. 899-910.
  • US EPA(1986). Quality Criteria for Water 1986, EPA 440/5-86-001, US EPA.
구매하기 (3,000)
추천 연관논문