기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
PUS가 적용된 지하벽체의 경제성 분석에 관한 연구
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • PUS가 적용된 지하벽체의 경제성 분석에 관한 연구
저자명
노삼영,김승훈,홍성진,박정태,김갑수,Noh. Sam-Young,Kim. Seung-Hun,Hong. Seong-Jin,Park. Jeong-Tae,Kim. Kap-Soo
간행물명
大韓建築學會論文集 : Journal of the architectural institute of Korea : Structure & construction / 構造系
권/호정보
2011년|27권 11호|pp.177-184 (8 pages)
발행정보
대한건축학회
파일정보
정기간행물|
PDF텍스트
주제분야
기타
이 논문은 한국과학기술정보연구원과 논문 연계를 통해 무료로 제공되는 원문입니다.
서지반출

기타언어초록

In spite of the large stiffness of the CIP wall, it is used only as the temporary wall. Because it shows the problems of straightness and the poor unification in the joint between the each pile. Recently the Uni-wall method which improves the disadvantage of the CIP has been developed, still for the temporary wall. Therefore, the Uni-wall method is utilized and Permanent Uni-wall System(PUS) tries to be developed. In this research, the economic analysis with the current method of construction which is used like the CIP method+basement wall and slurry wall method as the underground permanent wall in order to evaluate the profitability of PUS was performed. At this time, the structure and construction condition used in the analysis considered the arbitrary environment and With respect to this, each basement wall was designed and the output of resources and construction cost was calculated and it applied to the analysis. At this time, the construction cost classified as the material cost, labor cost, and expenses and analyze. The material cost analyzed result, Type 1 section of PUS was required the most expensive cost and the slurry wall method was required the smallest cost. The labor cost analyzed result, slurry wall method needed the most abundant cost and PUS Type 1 section needed the smallest human resource. The expenses analyzed result, slurry wall method was required the most expensive cost and the CIP method+basement wall needed the lowest cost. The total construction cost analyzed result, slurry wall method was required most expensive cost and PUS Type 2 section showed up as the most economic method.