기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
장바구니
 고객센터
본문검색
  • 검색 히스토리
실시간 인기검색어
서지반출
난청 성인 및 노인용 설문지에 대한 문헌 분석
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 난청 성인 및 노인용 설문지에 대한 문헌 분석
  • Questionnaires for the Hearing-impaired Adults and Elderly : A Systematic Literature Review
ㆍ 저자명
한우재,이동욱,구미승,김진숙
ㆍ 간행물명
Audiology and Speech ResearchKCI,SCOPUS
ㆍ 권/호정보
2015년|11권 1호(통권20호)|pp.3-16 (14 pages)
ㆍ 발행정보
한국청각언어재활학회|한국
ㆍ 파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.47MB)
ㆍ 주제분야
특수교육학
서지반출

국문초록

영문초록

Many research groups have developed various questionnaires for hearing-impaired listeners since 1990 while proving their reliability and validity. Currently, audiologists are able to use some of them at the beginning and/or end of consultation with their hearing-impaired patients and thus to estimate specific problems related to hearing loss, difficult listening situations, degree of disability including psychosocial and emotional aspects, and benefit from hearing aids based on numerical values of questionnaires. However, although these questionnaires have their own purposes and interpretation, the audiologists sometimes underuse or overuse them due to unfamiliarity. This paper reviews the most popular 11 questionnaires with the purpose, contents, scoring, and interpretation for the hearing-impaired adults and elderly. It also includes their pros and cons. Finally, it discusses which questionnaire should be considerable and need to be developed in clinical setting of Korea. This paper suggests that the questionnaires should extend effective auditory rehabilitation program.

목차

INTRODUCTION
CLASSIFICATION OF QUESTIONNAIRES
DISCUSSIONS
REFERENCES

키워드

설문지난청QuestionnaireHearing-impairmentALHQPHAPPHABSADLIOI-HAGHABPHHIAHHIESSQKESHHCOIS

참고문헌 (52건)

  • 구호림 & 김진숙. (2000). 한국 노인성 난청의 청각장 애지수(KHHIE)에 관한 검사-재검사 신뢰도. 언어 청각장애연구, 5(1), 133-154.
  • 구호림 & 김진숙. (2010a). 청각장애평가지수(KESHH) 개발을 위한 기초연구. 청능재활, 6(1), 55-59.
  • 구호림 & 김진숙. (2010b). 청각장애평가지수(KESHH) 의 표준화 연구. 청능재활, 6(2), 128-136.
  • 구호림 & 김진숙. (2010c). 노인성난청을 위한 청각장 애평가지수(KESHH)의 개발. 한국노년학회지, 30(3), 973-992.
  • 박장수 & 방정화. (2012). 청각장애평가지수 사용에 있어서 터치스크린과 설문지 유형 비교. 청능재활, 8(1), 87-94.
  • 조병해, 신은영, & 김진숙. (2011). Attitude toward Loss of Hearing Questionnaire (ALHQ)를 이용한 난청인의 심리적 평가의 타당성 연구. 청능재활, 7(1), 19-27.
  • Aiello, C. P., Lima, I. I., & Ferrari, D. V. (2011). Validity and reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for adults. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 77(4), 432-8.
  • Akeroyd, M. A., Guy, F. H., Harrison, D. L., & Suller, S. L. (2014). A factor analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale). International Journal of Audiology, 53(2), 101-114.
  • Brooks, D. N. (1989). The effect of attitude on benefit obtained from hearing aids. Brazilian Journal of Audiology, 23(1), 3-11.
  • Cox, R. M. (1997). Administration and application of the APHAB. Hearing Journal, 50, 32-48.
  • Cox, R. M. & Alexander, G. C. (1992). Maturation of hearing aid benefit: Objective and subjective measurements. Ear and Hearing, 13(3), 131-141.
  • Cox, R. M. & Alexander, G. C. (1995). The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear and Hearing, 16(2), 176-186.
  • Cox, R. M. & Alexander, G. C. (1999). Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL scale. Ear and Hearing, 20(4), 306-320.
  • Cox, R. M. & Alexander, G. C. (2001). Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear and Hearing, 22(2), 151-160.
  • Cox, R. M. & Alexander, G. C. (2002). The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version. International Journal of Audiology, 41(1), 30-35.
  • Cox, R. M., Alexander, G. C., & Beyer, C. M. (2003a). Norms for the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 14(8), 403-413.
  • Cox, R. M., Alexander, G. C., & Gray, G. A. (2003b). Audiometric correlated of the unaided APHAB. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 14(7), 361-371.
  • Cox, R. M. & Gilmore, C. (1990). Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP). Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 33(2), 343-357.
  • Cox, R. M., Gilmore, C., & Alexander, G. C. (1991) Comparison of two questionnaires for patientassessed hearing aid benefit. Journal of American Academy of Audiolology, 2(3), 134-145.
  • Cox, R., Hyde, M., Gatehouse, S., Noble, W., Dillon, H., Bentler, R., et al. (2000). Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. International Cooperation. Ear and Hearing, 21(4 Suppl), 106S-115S
  • Cox, R. M., Stephens, D., & Kramer, S. E. (2002). Translations of the International Outcome inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). International Journal of Audiology, 41(1), 3-26.
  • Cox, R. M. & Rivera, I. M. (1992). Predictability and reliability of hearing aid benefit measured using the PHAB. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 3, 242-254.
  • Demeester, K., Topsakal, V., Hendrickx, J. J., Fransen, E., van Laer, L., Van Camp, G., et al. (2012). Hearing disability measured by the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale in clinically normalhearing and hearing-impaired middle-aged persons, and disability screening by means of a reduced SSQ (the SSQ5). Ear and Hearing, 33(5), 615-616.
  • Demers, K., Healthcare, G. D. K., & Putnam, C. T. (2013). Hearing screening in older adults. Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing.
  • Dillon, H., Koritschoner, E., Battaglia, J., Lovegrove, R., Ginis, J., Mavrias, G., et al. (1991). Rehabilitation effectiveness I: Assessing the needs of clients of a national hearing rehabilitation program. Australian Journal of Audiology, 13, 55-65.
  • Dillon, H., James, A., & Ginis, J. (1997). Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8(1), 27-43.
  • Dillon, H. & So, M. (2000). Incentives and obstacles to the routine use of outcome. Ear and Hearing, 4, 2S-6S.
  • DiStasio, D. & Jupiter, T. (1998). An evaluation of the HHIE-S as a screening tool for the elderly homebound population. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 31, 11-22.
  • Gatehouse, S. (1999a). A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services. Health Bull (Edinb), 57(6), 424-436.
  • Gatehouse, S. (1999b). Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 10, 80-103.
  • Gatehouse, S. & Noble, W. (2004). The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). International Journal of Audiology, 43(2), 85-99.
  • Hosford-Dunn, H. & Halpern, J. (1999). Clinical application of the satisfaction with amplification in daily life scale in private practice I: Statistical, content, and factorial validity. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11(10), 523-539.
  • Hosford-Dunn, H. & Halpern, J. (2001). Clinical application of the SADL scale in private practice II: Predictive validity of fitting variables. Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12(1), 15-36.
  • Hug, G. A., Jacobson, G. P., Newman, C., W., & Weinstein, B. E. (1990). The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: Psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear and Hearing, 11(6), 430-433.
  • Hull, R. H. (2012). Hearing and aging. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing Inc.
  • Johnson, J. A., Cox, R. M., & Alexander, G. C. (2010). Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms. Ear and Hearing, 31(1), 47-55.
  • Kramer, S. E., Goverts, S. T., Dreschler, W. A., Boymans, M., & Festen, J. M. (2002). International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Results from the Netherlands. International Journal of Audiology, 41(1), 36-41.
  • Moeller, M. P. (1993). Auditory learning: Efficacy and evaluation. Presented at developments in pediatric audiology: Assessment and amplification, September 1993, Omaha, NE.
  • Nelson, C. T. & Palmer, C. V. (1994). Test-retest reliability of the profile of hearing aid performance. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 37(5), 1211-1215.
  • Noble, W. (2002). Extending the IOI to significant other and to non-hearing-aid-based interventions. International Journal of Audiology, 41(1), 27-29.
  • Noble, W. & Gatehouse, S. (2004). Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. International Journal of Audiology, 43(2), 100-114.
  • Noble, W. & Gatehouse, S. (2006). Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). International Journal of Audiology, 45(3), 172-81.
  • Noble, W., Jensen, N. S., Naylor, G., Bhullar, N., & Akeroyd, M. A. (2013). A short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of hearing scale suitable for clinical use: The SSQ12. International Journal of Audiology, 52(6), 409-412.
  • Polonenko, M. J., Scollie, S. D., Moodie, S., Seewald, R. C., Laurnagaray, D., Shantz, J., et al. (2010). Fit to targets, preferred listening levels, and self-reported outcomes for the DSL v5.0 a hearing aid prescription for adults. International Journal of Audiology, 49(8), 550-560.
  • Purdy, S. C. & Jerram, J. C. (1998). Investigation of the profile of hearing aid performance in experienced hearing aid users. Ear and Hearing, 19(6), 473-480.
  • Saunders, G. H. & Cienkowski, K. M. (1996). Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the Attitudes toward Loss of Hearing Questionnaire. Ear and Hearing, 17(6), 505-519.
  • Saunders, G. H., Cienkowski, K. M., Forsline, A., & Fausti, S. (2005). Normative data for the Attitudes towards Loss of Hearing Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16(9), 637-652.
  • Saunders, G., Forsline, A., & Jacobs, P. (2007). The Attitudes towards Loss of Hearing Questionnaire (ALHQ): A comparison of paper and electronic formats. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18(1), 66-77.
  • Stephens, D. (2002). The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and its relationship to the Client-Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI). International Journal of Audiology, 41(1), 42-47.
  • Weinstein, B. E. (1986). Validity of a screening protocol for identifying elderly people with hearing problems. Journal of the American Speech-Language- Hearing Association, 28, 41-45.
  • Whitmer, W. M., Howell, P., & Akeroyd, M. A. (2014). Proposed norms for the Glasgow Hearing- Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP) questionnaire. International Journal of Audiology, 53(5), 345-351.
  • Zelski, R. F. (2000). Use of the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement as a clinical outcome measure in the veterans affairs national hearing aid program. University of South Florida Graduate Theses and Dissertations. South Florida.
구매하기 (4,300)
장바구니
추천 연관논문