기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
숫자간간격과 반응방식에 따른 이분숫자청취검사의 수행력
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 숫자간간격과 반응방식에 따른 이분숫자청취검사의 수행력
  • Performance of Dichotic Digit Test by Inter-digit Intervals and Response Modes
저자명
정윤미,장현숙
간행물명
Audiology and Speech ResearchKCI,SCOPUS
권/호정보
2015년|11권 3호(통권22호)|pp.203-213 (11 pages)
발행정보
한국청각언어재활학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.4MB)
주제분야
특수교육학
서지반출

국문초록

영문초록

The purpose of this study aimed to investigate appropriate parameters for clinical use by measuring effects of inter-digit-intervals (IDIs) and response modes on the dichotic 3 digit test. The dichotic 3 digit tests were performed in four different IDI conditions (500, 750, 850, and 1,000 ms) in free-recall response mode and in three attention modes (Free recall, Precued Rt or Precued Lt) with a 750 ms IDI appearing in a performance of 70%. Twenty adults, 10 males and 10 females with normal hearing sensitivity participated. The results of this study were as follows: first, the dichotic 3 digit recognition performance was increased as IDI increased from 500 ms to 850 ms and decreased as IDI increased from 850 ms to 1,000 ms. Second, performances by response modes in 750 ms condition were measured that score of ear which was given cue were higher than opposite ear. Recognition scores of Free-recall, Precued-Rt, and Precued-Lt conditions were 69.00%, 93.75%, and 72.00% for the right ear and 65.75%, 64.75%, and 83.75% for the left ear, respectively. Also, ear advantages appeared 3.25% REA, 28.00% REA, and 11.75% LEA in Free-recall, Precued-Rt, and Precued-Lt conditions, respectively. Performances were also higher in Precued-recall conditions than in Free-recall condition. The results revealed that dichotic 3 digit recognition scores changed by IDIs and response modes. It showed that the 850 ms in IDI in free-recall mode was a useful parameter clinically applicable in dichotic 3 digit test. Moreover, the 750 ms paradigm of IDI and Precued recall of response modes can be useful in clinical setting.

목차

INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSIONS
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (29건)

  • 김유경, 최양규, 박현, & 석동일. (2008). 정상 성인의 이분숫자청취의 특징. 특수교육저널: 이론과 실천, 9(2), 45-60.
  • 장현숙, 김유경, 황혜경, 이미숙, 조수진, 탁평곤 외. (2011). 한국어 중추청각처리 평가도구(CAPA-K)의 표준화 연구. 한림대학교: 한국청각언어재활학회 학술대회 발표논문집. pp. 65-67.
  • 장현숙, 전아름, 유현이, & 김유경. (2014). 한국어 이 분숫자청취검사의 개발 및 표준화 연구. 특수교육 저널: 이론과 실천, 15(4), 489-506.
  • 전아름. (2008). 이분청취검사(Dichotic Listening Test) 에서 자극의 복잡성, 제시방법 및 연령에 따른 수 행능력 비교. 한림대학교 일반대학원 석사학위논 문. 춘천.
  • 전아름 & 장현숙. (2009). 자극의 복잡성, 주의집중방 식 및 연령에 따른 이분숫자청취 능력 비교. 특수 교육저널: 이론과 실천, 10(4), 377-395.
  • Broadbent, D. E. (1954). The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(3), 191.
  • Bryden, M. P. (1988). An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. In Hugdahl, K. (Ed.), Handbook of Dichotic Listening: Theory, Methods, and Research. Chichester, Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
  • Carter, A. S. & Wilson, R. H. (2000). The effect of filtering and inter-digit interval on the recognition of dichotic digits. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(5), 599-606.
  • Clarke, J. M., Lufkin, R. B., & Zaidel, E. (1993). Corpus callosum morphometry and dichotic listening performace: Individual differences in functional interhemispheric inhibition?. Neuropsychologia, 31(6), 547-557.
  • Hugdahl, K. & Andersson, L. (1986). The “forcedattention paradigm” in dichotic listening to CVsyllables: A comparison between adults and children. Cortex, 22(3), 417-432.
  • Humes, L. E., Coughlin, M., & Talley, L. (1996). Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 419-427.
  • Lau, C. (2014). CAPDOTS. Retrieved from http://capdots.com/about-capdots/our-story/.
  • Kimura, D. (1961). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 166-171.
  • Kimura, D. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3(2), 163-178.
  • Maerlender, A. (2010). Short‐term memory and auditory processing disorders: Concurrent validity and clinical diagnostic markers. Psychology in the Schools, 47(10), 975-984.
  • Meyer, V. & Yates, A. J. (1955). Intellectual changes following temporal lobectomy for psychomotor epilepsy: Preliminary communication. Journal of Neurology, 18(1), 44.
  • Milner, B. (1958). Psychological detects produced by temporal lobe excision. Research Publications of the Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease, 36, 244-257.
  • Musiek, F. E. (1983). Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: The dichotic digit test revisited. Ear and Hearing, 4(2), 79-83.
  • Musiek, F. E. (2004). The DIID: A new treatment for APD. The Hearing Journal, 57(7), 50.
  • Musiek, F. E. & Chermak, G. D. (2007). Handbook of (central) auditory processing disorder. Volume I. Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis. San Diego, CA: Oxford Brisbane.
  • Noffsinger, D., Martinez, C. D., & Wilson, R. H. (1994). Dichotic listening to speech: Background and preliminary data for digits, sentences, and nonsense syllables. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 5(4), 248-254.
  • Sitterley, T. E. (1968). Short-term retention of sequentially presented digits as a function of interdigit interval, digit duration, and series length. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78(1), 174.
  • Speaks, C., Niccum, N., & Van Tasell, D. (1985). Effects of stimulus material on the dichotic listening performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 28(1), 16-25.
  • Strouse, A. & Hall, J. W. (1995). Test-retest reliability of a dichotic digits test for assessing central auditory function in Alzheimer's Disease: Original paper. International Journal of Audiology, 34(2), 85-90.
  • Strouse, A. & Wilson, R. H. (1999). Recognition of one-, two-, three-pair dichotic digits under free and directed recall. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, 557-571.
  • Strouse, A., Wilson, R. H., & Brush, N. (2000). Recognition of dichotic digits under pre-cued and post-cued response conditions in young and elderly listeners. British Journal of Audiology, 34(3), 141- 151.
  • Voyer, D., Dempsey, D., & Harding, J. A. (2014). Response procedure, memory, and dichotic emotion recognition. Brain and Cognition, 85, 180-190.
  • Wilson, R. H. & Jaffe, M. S. (1996). Interactions of age, ear, and stimulus complexity on dichotic digit recognition. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7(5), 358-364.
  • Zenker, E. M., Cosialls, M., Carmona, D., Belda, F., & Barajas, J. (1972). The effect of age over the dichotic digit test. German Society of Audiology, 6(9), 174.
구매하기 (4,000)
추천 연관논문