기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
변조이음향방사 억제 측정에 미치는 대측 자극 소음 강도의 영향
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 변조이음향방사 억제 측정에 미치는 대측 자극 소음 강도의 영향
  • The Level Effect of Contralateral Acoustic Stimulation (CAS) on the Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) Suppression
저자명
신진배,김지연,남의철,김진숙
간행물명
Audiology and Speech ResearchKCI,SCOPUS
권/호정보
2015년|11권 3호(통권22호)|pp.214-222 (9 pages)
발행정보
한국청각언어재활학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.49MB)
주제분야
특수교육학
서지반출

국문초록

영문초록

As an objective and non-invasive method to evaluate functional state of medial olivo cochlear (MOC) system, there has been growing interest in contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE). Also, MOC system can be quantified by measuring the difference DPOAE amplitude recorded in the presence of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS). The purpose of this study is to identify the optimal CAS level for measuring the DPOAE contralateral suppression. In order to do that, the effect of gender, direction of ear, and the CAS level of the DPOAE suppression for normal hearing adults were tested. Data were collected from the thirty six ears of the eighteen subjects with normal hearing in the both ears ranged from 21 to 26 years of age. DPOAE was tested by ILO 292 analyzer in DP-gram function. For each measurement, primary tones frequencies were ratio f2/f1 = 1.22(f1 < f2) and intensities were L1 = 65 dB SPL, L2 = 50 dB SPL. 2f1-f2 DPOAE was elicited using two pure tones and frequencies were measured in the range of 1,000 Hz to 6,727 Hz. Broad band noise was used for CAS of DPOAE. CAS was delivered through a TDH 39 headphone that was placed in the participant’s contralateral ear. CAS level was randomly presented at 50, 60, 65, 70, and 80 dB SPL. The results showed that, first, there was no significant effect of the direction of ear for DPOAE suppression (p > .05). The results showed that the DPOAE suppression was not significantly different between male and female (p > .05). However, the means and SDs of DPOAE suppression for 5 different CAS levels, 50, 60, 65, 70, and 80 dB SPL, were .66(±1.20), 1.02(±1.23), 1.47(±1.73), 1.58(±1.70), and 1.21(±1.46) dB. As the CAS levels increased, the majority of DPOAE suppression increased generally until 70 dB SPL. Taken together, the results of this study showed that CAS at different levels induced mainly DPOAE amplitude suppression. The amount of suppression increased as the CAS level was increased with the rolling phenomenon at 80 dB SPL than 70 dB SPL in CAS level. Consequently, the 70 dB SPL or more level appears to generate the acoustic reflex in normal ears, and the 70 dB SPL or less CAS level is expected to be efficient for observing decent DPOAE suppression.

목차

INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSIONS
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (36건)

  • 김지연, 심현용, 김진숙, & 남의철. (2012). 주파수 미 세구조(frequency fine structure)에서 대측 억제 전후 의 변조이음향방사 측정. 청능재활, 8(2), 165-176.
  • 장문영, 홍성광, 박민우, & 구자원. (2008). 정상인에 서 3 kHz Narrow Band Noise 자극에 의한 반대측 변조이음향방사의 억제. 대한청각학회, 12, 170-173.
  • 장현경, 구성민, 김성은, & 임덕환. (2006). 정상성인 에서 대역교차소음이 DPOAE Suppression 기능에 미치는 영향. 청능재활, 2(2), 147-154.
  • Abdala, C., Ma, E., & Sininger, Y. S. (1999). Maturation of medial efferent system function in humans. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2392-2402.
  • Abel, C., Wittekindt, A., & Kössl, M. (2009). Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates lowfrequency biasing of DPOAE: Efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state? Journal of Neurophysiology, 101(5), 2362-2371.
  • Atcherson, S. R., Martin, M. J., & Lintvedt, R. (2008). Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequencysensitive effect on the 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emission in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 438(1), 107- 110.
  • Berlin, C. I., Hood, L. J., Wen, H., Szabo, P., Cecola, R. P., Rigby, P. et al. (1993). Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hearing Research, 71(1), 1-11.
  • Brown, A. M. & Kemp, D. T. (1984). Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hearing Research, 13(1), 29-37.
  • Chang, M. Y., Song, J. J., Kim, J. S., & Koo, J. W. (2013). Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: A potential diagnostic tool to evaluate the vestibular nerve. Medical Hypotheses, 81(5), 830-833.
  • Collet, L., Kemp, D. T., Veuillet, E., Duclaux, R., Moulin, A., & Morgon, A. (1990). Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hearing Research, 43(2), 251-261.
  • Deeter, R., Abel, R., Calandruccio, L., & Dhar, S. (2009). Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(5), 2413-2424.
  • Durante, A. S. & Carvallo, R. M. M. (2002). Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in neonates. International Journal of Audiology, 41(4), 211-215.
  • Goodman, S. S. & Keefe, D. H. (2006). Simultaneous measurement of noise-activated middle-ear muscle reflex and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 7(2), 125-139.
  • Gaskill, S. A. & Brown, A. M. (1990). The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(2), 821-839.
  • Guinan, Jr. J. J. (2006). Olivocochlear efferents: Anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear and Hearing, 27(6), 589-607.
  • Harris, F. P., Lonsbury‐Martin, B. L., Stagner, B. B., Coats, A. C., & Martin, G. K. (1989). Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(1), 220-229.
  • Harrison, R., Sharma, A., Brown, T., Jiwani, S., & James, A. L. (2008). Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 128(4), 404-407.
  • James, A. L., Harrison, R. V., Pienkowski, M., Dajani, H. R., & Mount, R. J. (2005). Dynamics of real time DPOAE contralateral suppression in chinchillas and humans. International Journal of Audiology, 44(2), 118-129.
  • Kalluri, R. & Abdala, C. (2015). Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in human newborns. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(1), EL78- EL84.
  • Kemp, D. T. (1978). Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64(5), 1386-1391.
  • Khalfa, S., Veuillet, E., & Collet, L. (1998). Influence of handedness on peripheral auditory asymmetry. European Journal of Neuroscience, 10(8), 2731-2737.
  • Knudson, I. M., Shera, C. A., & Melcher, J. R. (2014). Increased contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions indicates a hyperresponsive medial olivocochlear system in humans with tinnitus and hyperacusis. Journal of Neurophysiology, 112(12), 3197-3208.
  • Kumar, U. A., Methi, R., & Avinash, M. C. (2013). Test/retest repeatability of effect contralateral acoustic stimulation on the magnitudes of distortion product ototacoustic emissions. The Laryngoscope, 123(2), 463-471.
  • Liberman, M. C. (1989). Rapid assessment of soundevoked olivocochlear feedback: Suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hearing Research, 38(1), 47-56
  • Lisowska, G., Smurzynski, J., Morawski, K., Namyslowski, G., & Probst, R. (2002). Influence of contralateral stimulation by two-tone complexes, narrow-band and broad-band noise signals on the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels in humans. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 122(6), 613-619.
  • Martin, G. K., Ohlms, L. A., Franklin, D. J., Harris, F. P., & Lonsbury-Martin, B. L. (1990). Distortion product emissions in humans. III. Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. The Annals of otology, rhinology and laryngology, 147(Suppl.), 30S-42S.
  • Moulinet, A., Collet, L., & Duclaux, R. (1993). Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans. Hearing Research, 65, 193-210.
  • Murdin, L. & Davies, R. (2008). Otoacoustic emission suppression testing: A clinician's window onto the auditory efferent pathway. Audiological Medicine, 6(4), 238-248.
  • Musiek, F. E., Smurzynski, J., & Bornstein, S. P. (1994). Otoacoustic emissions testing in adults: An overview. Otology and Neurotology, 15, 21-28.
  • Philibert, B., Veuillet, E., & Collet, L. (1998). Functional asymmetries of crossed and uncrossed medial olivocochlear efferent pathways in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 253(2), 99-102.
  • Puel, J. L. & Rebillard, G. (1990). Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: Evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87(4), 1630-1635.
  • Sturm, J. J. & Weisz, C. J. (2015). Hyperactivity in the medial olivocochlear efferent system is a common feature of tinnitus and hyperacusis in humans. Journal of Neurophysiology, jn-00948.
  • Warr, W. B. & Guinan, J. J. (1979). Efferent innervation of the organ of Corti: Two separate systems. Brain Research, 173(1), 152-155.
  • Williams, E. A., Brookes, G. B., & Prasher, D. K. (1994). Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: Efferent effects in comparison with control subjects. Acta Oto-Laryngologica,114, 121-129.
  • Wolter, N. E., Harrison, R. V., & James, A. L. (2014). Separating the contributions of olivocochlear and middle ear muscle reflexes in modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emission levels. Audiology and Neurotology, 19(1), 41-48.
  • Zhang, F., Boettcher, F. A., & Sun, X. M. (2007). Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Effect of the primary frequency in DP-gram. International Journal of Audiology, 46(4), 187-195.
구매하기 (3,000)
추천 연관논문