기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
이공계 대학생의 이공계 진로 진출 의사에 영향을 끼치는 대학의 구성적 환경 요인 분석: 성별 차이를 중심으로
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 이공계 대학생의 이공계 진로 진출 의사에 영향을 끼치는 대학의 구성적 환경 요인 분석: 성별 차이를 중심으로
  • Exploring constructive factors of campus learning environment affecting STEM students’ career aspirations: Is there gender difference?
저자명
변수연
간행물명
교육학연구KCI
권/호정보
2016년|54권 1호(통권169호)|pp.375-399 (25 pages)
발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.82MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구에서는 한국교육개발원의 2014년 대학생 학습과정 조사 데이터를 이용하여 이공계 대학생 의 유관분야 진로 진출 의사에 유의한 영향을 끼치는 대학 내의 구성적 환경 요인의 구조적 관계를 분석하였다. 전체 표본(N=19,756)에 대한 구조모형의 적합도를 분석한 결과 교수-학생 상호작용, 대학 의 다양성 존중 풍토, 학내 구성원들 간의 관계의 친밀성 등의 구성적 요인들은 대학만족도를 매개로 하여 이공계 진로계획에 유의미한 직간접적인 효과를 끼치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 효과가 남녀 집 단 간의 차이가 있는지를 확인하기 위해 다집단 분석을 실시한 결과, 대다수의 구성적 환경 요인이 대 학만족도와 이공계 진로계획에 끼치는 직접적 효과는 남녀 집단 간에 차이가 없었다. 다만 대학만족도 가 이공계 진로계획에 끼치는 영향력은 남학생 집단에 비해 여학생 집단에서 더 커 이공계 여학생들 의 이공계 진로진출을 촉진하기 위해서는 대학만족도를 증진하는 다양한 환경적 요소를 개선해야 함 을 시사하였다. 공변량으로 투입된 학생의 개인적, 대학의 기관적 특징이 대학만족도나 이공계 진로계 획에 끼치는 효과에서 성별 차이를 나타냈다. 이와 같은 분석 결과를 토대로 이공계 학문을 공부하는 여학생들의 유관 분야 진로 진출을 촉진하기 위한 방법과 후속연구에 대한 제언을 논의하였다.

영문초록

This study explored contextual and constructive factors in college learning environment affecting STEM students’ aspirations to pursue a STEM career, based on the 2014 data of the National Assessment for Student Engagement in Learning. The structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis of the total sample(N=19,756) reported that faculty-student interactions, campus climate of respecting diversity, the degree of intimacy among college constituents had a direct impact as well as an indirect impact mediated by college satisfaction on the plan to seek jobs or higher academic degrees in STEM field. The following multiple group analysis found no significant gender difference in the structural relationship implying that female students, in general, are affected by the campus learning environment in the same way as male students are. However, it is noteworthy that college satisfaction’s impact on the STEM career aspirations was larger in the female group than in the male group. It implies that enhancing student satisfaction by improving environmental factors will be the effective way to facilitate female STEM students' career choice in STEM fields. The covariates representing individual and institutional factors varied in their significant impact on the STEM career aspirations across the gender groups. Based on these results, policy implications for promoting female STEM students’ career aspirations and further research on this topic were discussed.

목차

Ⅰ. 이론적 배경
II. 연구방법
III. 분석 결과
IV. 논의와 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (51건)

  • 강보길(1997). 교육현장에서의 여학생의 성별화 과정. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문. (Translated in English) Kang, B. K. (1997). Girls Identity in School: in Case of Hanul Girls School. Unpublished master’s thesis. Ewha Womans University.
  • 김민선·최보금(2014). 맥락적 지지와 전공 소속감의 관계에서 공학효능감과 결과기대의 매개효과 : 공과대학교 신입생들을 중심으로. 교육학연구, 52(4), 111-138. (Translated in English) Kim, M. S. & Choi, B. K.(2014). The relation between contextual supports and sense of belonging among South Korean first year engineering students: Mediating effects of academic self-efficacy and outcome expectations. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 111-138.
  • 김민정(2011). 이공계 연구중심대학의 통합형 교양교육과정에 대한 연구. 교양교육연구, 6(3), 357-381. (Translated in English) Kim, M. J. (2008). A study on the interdisciplinary integrated general education curriculum in the university of science and technology. Korean Journal of General Education, 6(3), 357-381.
  • 김지현·오명숙·정윤경(2007). 현장적응력 향상을 위한 여성공학인력 양성방안 연구. 한국산업기 술재단보고서. (Translated in English) Kim, O.H., Oh, M.S., & Chung, Y.K.(2007). A study on Policies of Enhancing Field Adaptability of Female Engineering Workforce. The Korean Industrial Technology Foundation.
  • 김주환·김민규·홍세희(2009). 구조방정식모형으로 논문쓰기. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스 (Translated in English) Kim, J. H., Kim. M. K., & Hong, S. H. (2009). Writing a Thesis using Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Seoul: Communication Books.
  • 도승이(2009). 공대 남학생과의 비교를 통한 여자 공대생의 전공수업 및 진로관련 심리적 요인 예측변인 탐구. 교육학연구, 47(3), 23-48. (Translated in English) Do, S. L.(2009). Factors that predict the adjustment to the class, the class satification, the career aspirations, and the career self-efficacy of male and female engineering students. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 23-48.
  • 민무숙·이정희(2005). 공학분야 전공 여성들의 교육과 직업 경험 분석. 교육사회학연구, 15(2), 65-93. (Translated in English) Min, M. S. & Lee, J. H. (2005). Analysis of Educational and Occupational Experiences of Women Studying Engineering. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 65-93.
  • 배상훈‧장환영‧송해덕‧김혜정‧전수빈(2012) 학부교육선진화 선도대학 지원사업 성과평가 종단연구. 한국교양기초교육원. (Translated in English) Bae, S.H., Jang, H.Y., Song, H.D., Kim, H.J., & Jeon, S.B.(2012). A Longitudinal Analysis of Student Engagement of Korean Universities That Participated in the Advancement of College Education Project. Korean General Education Association.
  • 변수연(2014). 이공계 연구중심 대학교의 캠퍼스 문화에 대한 생태학적 탐색- A대학의 신입생 대학 경험을 중심으로. 교육학연구, 52(3), 55-84. (Translated in English) Byoun, S. Y. (2014). Exploring a Korean STEM university's campus culture from an ecological perspective : Focusing on the freshmen experiences. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 52(3), 55-84.
  • 신선미·강선미(2008). IT분야 여성인력 수급의 특징과 정책 방향. 한국통신학회지(정보와통신), 25(5), 85-86. (Translated in English) Shin. S. M. & Kang, S. M.(2008). The supply and demand trend of female resources in ICT industry and its policy implications. The Journal of The Korean Institute of Communication Sciences 25(5), 2008.4, 85-86
  • 신선미·오은진(2004). 전문대학의 여성인적자원 개발 현황과 정책과제-이공계열을 중심으로. 서울: 한국여성정책연구원. (Translated in English) Shin. S. M. & Oh, E. J..(2004). The Current Development of Female Human Capital Education in the Korean Technical Colleges and its Policy Implications. Seoul: Korean Women’s Development Institution.
  • 안수영(2008). 지방대 여학생의 취업장벽과 취업준비. 충남대학교 일반대학원 박사학위논문 (Translated in English) Provincial University Female Student's Employment Barriers Employment and Preparation. Doctoral dissertation of Chungnam National University.
  • 이경남(2013). ICT 부문 여성 인력 현황 및 시사점. 정보통신방송정책, 25(14), 1-28. (Translated in English) Lee, K. N. (2013). The present status of female resources and its policy implications. ICT Policy Report, 25(14). 1-28.
  • 이주희·전병유·Lee., J. (2004). 유리천장 깨뜨리기. 서울: 한울 (Translated in English) Lee, J. H., Jeon, B. Y., & Lee. J. (2004). Breaking through the Glass Ceiling. Seoul: Hanul.
  • 임정연·이영민(2008). 4년제 대학 이공계 전공 여학생의 직업 준비과정이 이행결과에 미치는 영 향. 직업능력개발연구, 11(2), 25-47. (Translated in English) Lim, J. Y. & Lee, Y. M.(2008). A Study on college-to-work transition of women college students majoring science and technology. Vocation Education & Training Research, 11(2), 25-47.
  • 정지은(2012). 남녀공학 이학계열 여성 대학원생의 젠더 인식에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문. (Translated in English) Jung, J. E..(2012). A Study on Gender Concepts of Female Graduate Students in Coeducation STEM Universities. Unpublished master’s thesis. Ewha Womans University.
  • 정윤경·오명숙·김지현(2008). 공대 여학생 전공 관련 심리적 특성의 탐색. 공학교육연구, 11(4), 34-45. (Translated in English) Jeong, Y. K.. Oh, M. S., & Kim, J. H. (2008). Examination of psychological correlates of woman engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 11(4), 34-45
  • 주혜진(2008). 공대 여학생 사례를 통해 본 소수자의 사회심리학적 경험. 담론 201, 11(3), 117-150. (Translated in English) Joo, H. J. (2008). Women’s deflection feeling in engineering schools. Discourse 201, 11(3), 117-150.
  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What Matters in College: Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Astin, H. S. & Sax, L. J. (1996). Developing scientific talent in undergraduate women. In C. Davis, A. B. Ginorio, C. S. Hollenshead, B. B. Lazarus, P. M. Rayman, & Associates (eds.), The Equity Equation: Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Barker, L. J. & Garvin-Doxas, K. (2004). Making visible the behaviors that influence learning environment: A qualitative exploration of computer science classrooms. Computer Science Education, 14(1), 119-145.
  • Bentler, P. M. (1990), Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2), 238-46.
  • Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers. Gender and education, 17(2), 369-386.
  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A.
  • Bollen & J. S. Long (eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Cassell, G., & Slaughter, J. (2006). The challenge of the new demographics of higher education: Increasing women and minority participation in STEM disciplines. Business-Higher Education Forum (BHEF) 2006 Issue Brief, 1-4.
  • Chan, P.M.(2000). Am I smart enough? Bright high school girls in advanced mathematics. Dissertation Abstracts. University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, DAI-A 61/04.1305.
  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
  • Chubin, D., May, G., & Babco, E. (2005). Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 73-86.
  • Erwin, L., & Maurutto, P. (1998) Beyond access: Considering gender deficits in science education, Gender and Education, 10(1),51–69.
  • Hall, R. M. & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The Classroom Climate: A Chilly Climate for Women? Washington, D. C. ; Association of American Colleges.
  • Hill, S. (2007). Science and engineering degrees, by race/ethnicity of recipients: 1995-2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Resources Statistics(http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf07308/tables/tab1.xls)
  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle(eds.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications(pp.76-99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Huang, G., Taddese, N., & Walter, E. (2000). Entry and persistence of women and minorities in college science and engineering education. NCES 2000-601. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education statistics.
  • Hughes, R. (2014). The evolution of the chilly climate for women in science, In J. Koch & B. Irby (eds.) Girls and Women in STEM, 71-92. Charlotte, NC; Information Age Publishing, Inc.
  • Kuh, G. D. (2003). Organizational culture and student persistence. Journal of College Student Rentention, 3(1), 2001-2002.
  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schul, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2005). Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
  • Lanasa, S. M., Olson, E., & Alleman, N. (2007). The impact of on-campus student growth on first-year student engagement and success. Research in Higher Education, 48(8), 941-966. Nelson Laird, T. F., Garver, A. K., & Niskode, A. S. Gender gaps: Understanding teaching style differences between men and women. Paper presentation at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Kansas City, M., June 2-7, 2007.
  • Magnolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. (2000). The anatomy of interests: Women in undergraduate computer science. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 28(1/2), 104-127.
  • Marx, D. M. & Roman, J. B. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1183-1193.
  • Merton, P., Froyd, J.E., Clark, M.C., & Richardson, J.(2009). A case study of Relationshipbetween organizational culture and curricular change in engineering education. Innovative Higher Education, 34: 219-233.
  • Museus, S. D. & Liverman, D. (2010). High-performing institutions and their implications for studying underrepresented minority students in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 148, 17-27.
  • Tan, D. (2002). Majors in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Gender and ethnic differences in persistence and graduation. Retrieved October, 10, 2015, from University of Oklahoma website, Center for Student Affair Research, http://www.ou.edu/jrcoe/csar/literature/tan_paper3.pdf
  • Tierney, W. G. (1988). Organizational culture in higher education: Defining the essentials. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(1), 2-21.
  • Renn, K. A. & Arnold, K. D. (2003). Reconceptualizing research on college student peer culture. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(3), 261-291.
  • Shapiro, C. A. & Sax, L. J. (2011). Major selection and persistence for women in STEM. New Direction for Institutional Research, 152, 5-18.
  • Sax, L. J. (1996). The dynamics of Tokenism: How college students are affected by the proportion of women in their major. Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 389-425.
  • Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N.M.(1997). Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Strange, C. C., & Banning, J. H. (2001). Educating by design: Creating Campus Learning Environments that work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Strenta, A. C. & Associates. (1994). Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education, 35(5), 513-547.
  • Wasburn, M. H. & Miller, S. G. (2004-2005). Retaining undergraduate women in science, engineering, and technology: A survey of a student organization. Journal of College Student Retention, 6(2), 155-168.
구매하기 (5,400)