기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
어울림 학교폭력예방 프로그램의 적용효과 분석
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 어울림 학교폭력예방 프로그램의 적용효과 분석
  • A Study on Effects of Applications for the Aulim School Violence Prevention Program
저자명
박효정,한미영,김현진
간행물명
교육학연구KCI
권/호정보
2016년|54권 3호(통권171호)|pp.121-150 (30 pages)
발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.72MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구는 2015년 학교현장에 보급된 어울림 학교폭력예방 프로그램이 프로그램의 취지 및 목적에 맞게 효과적으로 운영되고 있는지를 살펴보기 위한 목적으로 어울림 프로그램의 효과를 검증하였다. 이를 위해 어울림 프로그램을 운영하는 운영학교와 비운영학교를 대상으로, 프로그램 운영 전과 후 학생들의 심리사회적 역량(예: 공감, 의사소통, 감정조절 등), 학교폭력예방 역량(예: 학교폭력 허용도 등) 및 학교적응에서의 변화를 살펴보았다. 또한 어울림 프로그램 운영학교만을 대상으로, 어울림 프 로그램 운영방법(예: 운영방식, 운영주체)에 따른 적용효과의 차이가 나타나는지를 학교급별로 살펴보 았다. 연구결과, 어울림 프로그램 운영학교 학생들이 비운영학교 학생들보다 ‘의사소통, 갈등해결, 자 기존중감’, ‘학교폭력에 대한 적극적 대처 및 도움행동’, 그리고 ‘학교적응’ 점수가 더 높게 나타났다. 또한 어울림 프로그램의 효과는 ‘집중운영’보다는 ‘정기운영’ 방식에서, ‘외부 어울림 카운슬러 단독’보 다는 ‘교내교사 팀티칭’ 방식에서 더 높게 나타났지만, 이러한 프로그램의 효과는 학교급에 따라 조금 씩 다른 양상을 보였다. 마지막으로, 본 연구결과를 기초로 단위학교별 어울림 프로그램의 효과적인 운영 및 현장 착근 방안을 제언하였다.

영문초록

To examine whether the Aulim school violence prevention program(the Aulim program) has been effectively accommodated in school settings, this study investigated effects of the Aulim program. Thus, this study tested pre-post psychosocial abilities(empathy, communication, emotional regulation et al.), school violence prevention abilities(allowance of school violence), and changes of school adjustment in the Aulim(treatment) groups and the non-Aulim(non-treatment) groups. Also, this study examined the effects of different operating systems(operating types, operating entities) regarding the levels of schools(primary, middle, and high schools) among the Aulims. Results showed that the Aulim revealed better scores in communication, conflict resolution, self-esteem, active actions to prevent school violences, and school adjustment than the non-Aulim groups did. Furthermore, better results were shown when the Aulim was conducted regularly and a teacher’s team took charge of the program than when Aulim was conducted intensively in a short period of time and an Aulim counselor only managed it. However, these results were revealed differently among the levels of schools. Finally, based on the results of this study, we suggested the effective operating systems and implications to administer this program across schools.

목차

I. 서론
II. 선행연구 분석
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 결론 및 논의
참고문헌

참고문헌 (47건)

  • 강경자(1996). 의사소통증진을 위한 훈련 프로그램의 효과. 석사학위논문, 창원대학교. (Translated in English) Kang, K. J. (1996). The effects of the communication training program. Master’s thesis, Changwon National University.
  • 교육부(2013. 6). 어울림 프로그램 추진 기본계획. 교육부 보도자료. (Translated in English) Ministry of Education (2013. June). Implementation plans for the Aulim program. Ministry of Education News release.
  • 공문숙(2004). YP활동을 기초로 한 학교폭력예방 프로그램의 효과에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 성산효대학원대학교. (Translated in English) Kong, M. S. (2004). The effect of the school violation prevention program based on YP. Master's thesis. Sungsan Hyo University.
  • 곽금주(2008). 한국의 왕따와 예방프로그램. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(1), 255-272. (Translated in English) Kwak, K. J. (2008). Korean Wang-ta: Characteristics and prevention program. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 14(1), 255-272.
  • 김경희·김경회(1998). 유아용 정서지능 평정척도 개발을 위한 예비연구. 한국심리학회지: 발달,11(2), 31-48. (Translated in English) Kim, K, H. & Kim, K. H. (1998). A preliminary study on the development of emotional intelligence rating scale for preschool children. Korean Journal of Psychology: Development, 11(2), 31-48.
  • 김유미(2004). 초등학교 학생의 집단 따돌림 예방 프로그램 효과. 석사학위논문, 한남대학교. (Translated in English) Kim, Y. M. (2004). The effects of a group counseling program for preventing group bullying in elementary school students. Master’s thesis, Hannam University.
  • 김현정·심혜원(2013). 초등학교 저학년을 위한 학교폭력예방프로그램의 효과 연구. 교육과학연구, 44(3), 49-75. (Translated in English) Kim, H. J. & Shin, H. W. (2013). A study on the effect of a school violence prevention program on lower grade elementary school students. Journal of Educational Studies, 44(3), 49-75.
  • 김혜진(2002). 학교폭력 예방 프로그램 개발과 그 효과: 학교폭력에 대한 태도와 사회적, 심 리적 학교환경지각. 석사학위논문, 전남대학교. (Translated in English) Kim, H. J. (2002). The development of school-violence prevention program and analysis of its effects. Master’s thesis, Chonnam National University.
  • 박성희(1996). 공감, 공감적 이해. 서울: 원미사. (Translated in English) Park, S. H. (1996). Empathy, empathic understanding. Seoul: Wonmisa.
  • 박인경(2010). 부모-자녀 의사소통에 따른 청소년의 공격성 및 정서조절능력. 석사학위논문, 한양대학교. (Translated in English) Park, I. K. (2010). Aggression and emotional regulation ability according to parent-adolescent communication. Master’s thesis, Hanyang University.
  • 박효정·이희현·김현진(2014). 학교폭력예방 표준 프로그램 개발 연구. 서울: 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Park, H. J., Lee, H. H., & Kim, H. J. (2014). Study on development of standard programs for prevention of school violence. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 박효정·정미경·김효원(2010). 학교폭력예방 프로그램의 적용효과 분석: 초등학생의 학교폭력에 대한 인식, 태도 및 행동, 대처능력의 변화를 중심으로. 한국교육, 37(4), 47-72. (Translated in English) Park, H. J., Chung, M. K., & Kim, H. W. (2010). The effect of the school violence prevention program at the elementary school level. Journal of Korean Education, 37(4), 47-72.
  • 박효정·정미경·박종효(2007). 학교폭력예방 프로그램 개발 연구. 서울: 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Park, H. J., Chung, M. K., & Park, J. H. (2007). Research on development of programs for prevention of school violence. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 성태제(2007). SPSS/AMOS를 이용한 알기 쉬운 통계분석. 서울: 학지사. (Translated in English) Sung, T. J. (2007). Statistical analysis that is easy to understand by using SPSS/AMOS. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  • 유정이(2002). 따돌림 아동을 위한 사회적 기술 향상 프로그램의 효과. 석사학위논문, 부산교육대학교. (Translated in English) You, J. Y. (2002). The Effects of a Social skill Program for elementary school students of Group Bullying. Master’s thesis, Busan National University of Education.
  • 이규미·김명식(2008). 중학생 학교적응 척도의 확인적 요인분석을 통한 타당화 연구. 한국심리 학회지: 학교, 5(1), 27-40. (Translated in English) Lee, K, M. & Kim, M. S. (2008). A validation study of the school adjustment scale for middle school students. Korean Journal of School Psychology, 5(1), 27-40.
  • 이은해·고윤주·오원정(2000). 청소년기 친구에 대한 만족감과 친구의 지원 및 갈등해결. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 13(3), 105-121.(Translated in English) Rhee, U. H., Koh, Y. J., & Oh, W. J. (2000). Friend’s support andconflict-resolution styles as predictors of friendship satisfaction in adolescence. KoreanJournal of Psychology: Development, 13(3), 105-121.
  • 윤성우(2004). 집단따돌림 방관자에 대한 또래지지프로그램 효과. 석사학위논문, 가톨릭대학교. (Translated in English) Yoon, S. Y. (2004). The effect of peer-support program for the outsiders of the bullying. Master’s thesis, The Catholic University of Korea.
  • 이훈구·권준모·곽금주·김범준·홍영오(2000). 학원폭력 예방프로그램 연구 보고서. 서울: 국무총리 청소년보호위원회. (Translated in English) Lee, H. K., Kwan, J. M., Kwak, K. J., Kim, B, J., & Hong, Y. O. (2000). A report of research on a school violence prevention program. Seoul: Ministry ofGender Equality and Family, Youth.
  • 장금순(2005). 민속놀이를 활용한 초등학생 학교폭력예방 프로그램 개발 연구. 박사학위논문, 숙명여자대학교. (Translated in English) Jang, G. S. (2005). A study on elementary school students’ school violence prevention program development using traditional games. Doctoral dissertation, Sookmyung Women’s University.
  • 정은하·신윤미·조선미(2016). 기질을 활용한 학교폭력 방관자 프로그램의 효과 검증. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 22(1), 119-135. (Translated in English) Jung, E. H., Shin, W. M., & Cho, S. M. (2016). The effects of the school violence prevention program using temperament. Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issues, 22(1), 119-135.
  • 최보가·전귀연(1993). 자아존중감 척도 개발에 관한 연구(I). 대한가정학회지, 31(2), 41-54. (Translated in English) Choi, B. G. & Jeon, G. Y. (1993). A study on the development of 「the self-esteem inventory」 Family and Environment Research, 31(2), 41-54.
  • 하지원(2004). 아동이 지각한 가족관계 및 정서조절능력이 친구 간 갈등해결전략에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 숙명여자대학교. (Translated in English) Ha, J. W. (2004). The effects of children's recognized family relation and emotional regulation on conflict resolution strategies in their friendship. Master’s thesis, Sookmyung Women’s University.
  • Badenes, L. V., Estevan, R. A. C., & Bacete, F. J. G. (2000). Theory of mind and peer rejection at school. Social Development, 9(3), 271-283.
  • Bauer, N. S., Lazano, P., & Rivara, F. P. (2007). The effectiveness of the Olweus bullying prevention programs in public middle schools: A controlled trial. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 266-274.
  • Berger, K. S. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27, 90-126.
  • Bienvenu, M. J. (1971). An interpersonal communication inventory. The Journal of Communication, 21(4), 381-388.
  • Botzer, E. (2003). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the second step violence prevention curriculum for third-grade students. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo, USA.
  • Bradshaw, C. P, Koth, C. W., Thornton, L. A., & Leaf, P. J. (2009). Altering school climate through school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports: Findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 10(2), 100-115.
  • Coopersmith, S. (1997). The antecedent of self-esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Company.
  • Corrigan, M. W., Klein, T. J., & Isaascs, T. (2010). Trust us: Documenting the relationship of students' trust in teachers to cognition, character, and climate. Journal of Research in Character Education, 8(2), 61-73.
  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimentional approach to individual difference inempathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology. 10, 85.
  • Eliot, M., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2010). Supportive school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying and threats of violence. Journal of School Psychology, 48(6), 533-553.
  • Farrell, A. D., Valois, R. F., Meyer, A. L., Tidwell, R. P. (2003). Impact of the RIPP violence prevention program on rural middle school students. Journal of primary prevention, 24(2), 143-167.
  • Gregory, A., Cornell, D., Fan, X, Sheras, P., Shih, T., & Huang, F. (2010). Authoritative school discipline: High school practices associated with lower student bullying and victimization. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 483-496.
  • Jackson, D. (2003). The use of school-based violence prevention programs in the promotion of safe schools for middle school students. Doctoral dissertation, Spalding University, Louisville, USA.
  • Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., & Kaljonen, A. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4-6. Child Development, 82(1), 311-330.
  • Kress, J. S., & Elias, M. J. (2006). School-based social and emotional learning programs. In K. A. Renniger & I. E. Sigel (Ed.) Handbook of child psychology(pp. 592-618), New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Mendelson, M. J., Goldbaum, S., & Semeniuk, J. (1995). Handling disagreements questionnaire. McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.
  • O’Moor, M., & Kirkham, C. (2001). Self-esteem and its relationship to bullying behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 269-283.
  • O'Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of adolescence, 22(4), 437-452.
  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge, Ma: Blackwell.
  • Salmivalli, C., & Poskiparta, E. (2012). Making bullying prevention a priority in Finnish schools: The KiVa antibullying program. New Directions for Youth Development, 133, 41-53.
  • Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1-15.
  • Skrzypiec, G., Slee, P., Murray-Harvey, R., & Pereira, B. (2011). School bullying by one or more ways: Does it matter and how do students cope? School Psychology International, 32(3), 288-311.
  • Spinkle, J. (2005). Animals, empathy, and violence: An evaluation of a school-based violence-prevention program in select South Carolina elementary and middle schools. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, USA.
  • Strohmeier, D., Hoffmann, C, Schiller, E. Stefanek, E., & Spiel, C.(2008). Visc Social Competence Program. New Directions for Youth Development, 133, 15-28.
구매하기 (5,900)