교사의 훈육유형이 어떻게 분류되고 각 훈육유형에 따라 훈육효과가 어떻게 나타나는지를 연구하는 것은 학교현장에서 학생들의 문제행동이 갈수록 심각해져가는 현실에 시사점을 줄 수 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 훈육유형 및 훈육효과에 관한 종합적인 문헌연구를 검토한 뒤, 요인분석을 사용하여 교사의 훈육유형과 훈육효과의 구성요를 실증적으로 분류하였고 일원분산분석 및 Scheffe 검증을 사용하여 교사의 훈육유형에 따라 훈육효과가 어떻게 나타나는가를 분석하였다. 연구결과, 교사의 훈육유형은 여섯 가지(민주형, 타협형, 방임형, 전제형, 지원형, 절충형)로 분류되었고, 훈육효과의 구성요소는 일곱 가지(학급풍토, 인간관계, 자아개념, 문제행동 감소, 자기통제, 친사회적 행동, 학습태도)로 분류되었다. 그리고 교사의 훈육유형이 민주형과 타협형일 때 훈육효과의 구성요소 거의 대부분에서 가장 효과가 있으며, 방임형일 때 가장 효과가 없는 것으로 나타났다.
The purpose of this study was to actually analyze teacher\'s discipline style and discipline effectiveness. To accomplish this purpose, subjects of this study were selected as follow. First, how teacher\'s discipline style are actually identified, second, how the components of discipline effectiveness are actually identified, third, what is the relation between teacher\'s discipline style and discipline effectiveness. As sampling, sixth grades 2,500 students of 73 classrooms of 13 elementary schools were sampled. As a tool of investigation, questionnaires about teacher\'s discipline style and discipline effectiveness had made by researcher of this study were used. And as processing of data, factor analysis, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe-test were used. The result of this study is as follow. First, teacher\'s discipline style was actually identified as six, in other words, democratic, compromiser, supporter, autocracy, mixer, and noninterventionist. Second, the components of discipline effectiveness were actually identified as seven, in other words, student\'s self-concept, self-control, human relationship, proactive behavior, learning attitude, classroom climates, and desist of misbehavior. Third, in the relation between teacher\'s discipline style and discipline effectiveness, teacher\'s discipline style of democratic and compromiser was effective than other discipline style. Teacher\'s discipline style of noninterventionist was ineffective in all components of discipline effectiveness. And teacher\'s discipline style of autocracy was not always ineffective, and better effective than noninterventionist
Ⅰ. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 Ⅲ. 연구방법 Ⅳ. 연구결과 Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의 참고문헌
