기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
장바구니
 고객센터
본문검색
  • 검색 히스토리
실시간 인기검색어
서지반출
인식된 교내폭력 환경과 긍정적인 관계가 형성된 학교풍토가 학습경험과 학업적응에 미치는 영향 탐색
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 인식된 교내폭력 환경과 긍정적인 관계가 형성된 학교풍토가 학습경험과 학업적응에 미치는 영향 탐색
  • Effects of Students’ Perceived School Bullying Environment and Positive Relationship School Environment on Academic Experiences and Adjustment
ㆍ 저자명
김현진
ㆍ 간행물명
교육학연구KCI
ㆍ 권/호정보
2015년|53권 1호(통권165호)|pp.167-193 (27 pages)
ㆍ 발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
ㆍ 파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(1.27MB)
ㆍ 주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구의 목적은 학교폭력 학교환경과 교사-학생 및 학생-학생의 신뢰하고 존중하는 학교환경이 학생들의 학습경험과 학업적응에 미치는 효과를 분석하기 위한 것이다. 또한 중학교시기의 경험이 고 등학교시기의 경험에 어떻게 영향을 미치는가를 함께 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 한국교육개발원의 종단 연구의 2차년도(중2)와 4차년도(고1) 자료를 사용하였다. 종단연구에는 총 6,908명 학생이 참여하였으 나 중학교나 고등학교에서 응답하지 않은 자료와 60% 이하로 응답한 자료를 제외하고 5,916명의 자 료를 사용하였다. 본 연구를 위해 사용된 측정도구는 학교환경, 학습경험, 학업적응과 관련된 변인이 고, 분석은 SPSS 21를 이용한 상관관계분석과 연구모형에 대한 M-plus를 이용한 경로분석을 통해 이루어졌다. 연구결과에서 학교폭력 학교환경은 학습비동조행위를 증가시키고 학교교육에 대한 만족 도를 저하시킨 반면, 긍정적인 관계가 형성된 학교환경은 인식된 교사의 열정과 학교교육만족도를 증 가시킨 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구는 학교폭력 학교환경에 대응하는 서로 존중하는 학교환경의 역할 과 중학교시기와 고등학교시기의 긍정적인 학교생활의 중요성을 시사하였다고 제시하였다.

영문초록

This study investigates the effects of school environments characterized by violence and by trust and respect between teachers and students and between students and students on students’ academic experiences and adjustment. It examines how middle school experiences influence high school experiences. The study uses 2nd(middle school second year) and 4th(high school freshmen) data of KELS. Excluded from this data were those that did not fill out the survey either in middle school or in high school, or who answered less than 60% of the survey, and thus this study used data from 5,916 out of 6,908 participants. Measures were related to school environment variables, academic experiences, and academic adjustment at school. This study conducted correlation by using SPSS 21 and path analyses with the research model by using M-plus. Results showed that an environment characterized by school violence increased learning related to non-proper behaviors and decreased satisfaction with school education. However, it was shown that a positive relationship environment at school enhanced perceived teachers’ enthusiasm and satisfaction with school education. The study’s contribution is that it reveals the importance of a mutually respectful environment compared to one marked by school violence and of students’ positive school experiences in middle school and high school.

목차

I. 서론
Ⅱ. 선행연구 분석
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의
참고문헌

키워드

학교환경학교폭력학업적응존중하는 관계학습경험School EnvironmentSchool ViolenceAcademic AdjustmentRespectful RelationshipsAcademic Experiences at School

참고문헌 (34건)

  • 김범수(2008). 학교폭력의 실태 분석과 예방 대책에 관한 연구. 사회과학연구, 17, 1-22. (Translated in English) Kim, B. S.(2008). A study of school bullying and measures of prevention. Social Science Research, 17, 1-22.
  • 김병찬(2012). 핀란드의 키바 코울루 프로그램 및 한국교육에 주는 시사점. 서울: 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Kim, B. C.(2012). Implications of the Finland's KiVa Koulu Program. Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 김아영(2010). 학업동기: 이론, 연구와 적용. 서울: 학지사. (Translated in English) Kim, A. (2010). Academic motivation: Theory, Research, and Application, Seoul: Hakjisa.
  • 김현진(2013). 교사·학교장 신념과 중학생의 자율성 및 자기효능감, 학업성취도의 관계 분석. 교육학연구, 51(2), 117-143. (Translated in English) Kim, H. J. (2013). An analysis of relations among teacher and principal's beliefs and 8th grade students' autonomy, self-efficacy and achievement. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 51(2), 117-143.
  • 김현진·정재학(2011). 지각된 교수자 특성과 대학생들의 학업적 흥미, 즐거움, 내적동기, 인지적 학습전략 사용 및 과목만족도의 관계 분석. 교육심리학연구, 25(3), 569-589. (Translated in English) Kim, H. J., & Jung, J. H.(2011). Relations among teaching factors, student's interest, enjoyment, intrinsic motivation, student learning. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(3), 569-589.
  • 박종효(2007). 학교폭력 가해행동에 대한 이해: 대인관계의 매개효과. 교육학연구, 45(1), 1-24. (Translated in English) Park, J. H.(2007). An Understanding of Aggressive Behavior of School Bullying and Violence: Mediation Effect of Interpersonal Relations, Korean Journal of Educational Research, 45(1), 1-24.
  • 박효정·이희현·김기은·김현진·윤안순·양경선·서정연(2013). 학교폭력예방을 위한 학교문화 형성요인 분석 연구. 서울: 한국교육개발원. (Translated in English) Park, H. J., Lee, H. H. Kim, K. E., Kim, H. J., Yun, A. S., Yang, K. S., & Seo, J. Y.(2014). An analysis of developing a school culture to prevent school bullying. Korean Educational Development Institute.
  • 이경아·이정윤·양현정(2005). 집단 따돌림이 청소년기 학교생활적응에 미치는 영향: 내면화 문제행동, 또래기술 및 자기존중감의 매개 중재 효과. 상담학연구, 6(2), 531-543. (Translated in English) Lee, K. A., Lee J. Y., & Yang, H. J.(2005). The effects of bullying on school adjustment of adolescent -mediating and moderating effects of internalizing problem behaviors, peer relational skills, and self-esteem. Korea Journal of Counseling, 6(2), 531-543.
  • 이문자(2004). 초등학교 집단따돌림 가해행동의 생태체계적 변인에 관한 연구. 임상사회사업연구, 1(1), 41-62. (Translated in English) Lee, M. J.(2004). A study on the eco-systematic variables of bullying behavior among elementary school students. Korean Academy of Clinical Social Work, 1(1), 41-62.
  • 정종진(2012). 생태학적 측면에서 본 학교폭력의 유발 요인. 초등상담연구, 11(3), 331-350. (Translated in English) Jeong, J. J. (2012). Ecological consideration of factors inducing school violence. Korean Journal of Elementary Counseling, 11(3), 331-350.
  • 조윤정·양명희(2008). 교사의 인식론적 신념과 교사효능감, 교수전략과의 관련성 탐구. 열린교육연구, 16(1), 1-20. (Translated in English) Cho, Y. J., & Yang, M. H. (2007). Secondary school teacher's epistemological beliefs and their relationship with teacher efficacy and instructional strategies. Journal of Yeolin Education, 16(1), 1-20.
  • 청소년폭력예방재단(2014). 2013년 전국 학교폭력 실태조사 결과발표. 서울: 동연구소. (Translated in English) Foundation for the Youth School Violence Prevention(2014. 5). 2013 National Research on the Real Conditions of School Violence.
  • 홍종관(2012). 학교폭력의 실태, 원인 그리고 대처에 관한 연구. 초등상담연구, 11(2), 237-259. (Translated in English) Hong, J. K.(2012). School violence ,the status of school violence ,causes of school violence ,school violence countermeasures. Korean Journal of Elementary Counseling, 11(2), 237-259.
  • Badenes, L. V., Estevan, R. A. C., & Bacete, F. J. G.(2000). Theory of mind and peer rejection at school. Social Development, 9(3), 271-283.
  • Benbenishty, R., & Astor, R. A. (2008). School violence in an international context: A call for global collaboration in research and prevention. International Journal of Violence and school, 7, 59-80.
  • Berger, K. S. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27, 90-126.
  • Cornell, D., Gregory, A., Huang, F., & Fan, Xitao(2013). Perceived prevalence of teasing and bullying predicts high school dropout rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 138-149.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Dwyer, K. P., Osher, D., & Hoffman, C. C. (2000). Creating responsive schools: Contextualizing early warning, timely response. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 347-365.
  • Furrer, C. & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162.
  • Haataja, A., Boeten, M., Boulton, A. J., Ahtola, A., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The KiVa antibullying curriculum and outcome: Does fidelity matter? Journal of School Psychology, 52, 479-493.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Hyman, I., Kay, B., Tabori, A., Weber, M., Mahon, M., & Cohen, I. (2006). Bullying: Theory, research, and interventions. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues(pp. 855-884). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Jeffrey, L. R., Miller, D., & Linn, M.(2001). Middle school bullying as a context for the development of passive observers to the victimization of others. In R. A. Geffner, M. Loring, & C. Young(Eds.), Bullying behavior: Current issues, research, and interventions.(pp. 143-157. New York: Haworth Press.
  • Kress, J. S., & Elias, M. J. (2006). School-based social and emotional learning programs. In K. A. Renniger & I. E. Sigel (Ed.) Handbook of child psychology(pp. 592-618), New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137.
  • Nansel, T. R., Craig, W., Overpeck, M. D., Saluja, G., & Ruan, W. J. (2004). Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 158, 730–736.
  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Salmivalli, C. (2014). Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory into Practice, 53(4), 286-292.
  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
  • Solberg, M. E.., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/victim questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239-268.
  • Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C.(2014). The role of teachers in bullying: The relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology. 106(1), 1-9.
  • Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3-25.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
구매하기 (5,600)
장바구니
추천 연관논문