This study tried to analyze what kinds of relationship charismatic leadership has with sports which needs better performance. The purpose of this study is to analyze what meaning a charisma has, what the features of leadership are, how the effect of leadership shows and what correlation between charisma leadership and sports performance is. For this study, the existing literature regarding the relation between charisma leadership theory and sports performance was analyzed, and the temporal extent of this study was based on the significant data and information for the latest 5 years. Sports rights are understood to be guaranteed under Article 10 and Article 37 of the Constitution. Also sports rights are subjective civil rights for individuals and have effects toward the state. This means that the state must ensure sports rights passively by being obligated to prohibit infringement of the nation s rights to sports and actively by protecting the rights. Objectively, sports rights have characteristics of the state s value orders, providing ripple effects, spillover effects, and system guarantees. As for ripple effects, they are effective toward the state and have effects to have the state maintain sports rights as well as effects toward persons. Based on the foundation of sports rights, behaviors of charismatic leaders affect value system, attitudes, and behaviors of team members from the standpoint of a leader. Roles of charismatic leaders are about what a leader would do while the influence process selected by a leader is about how and why effectively a leader s behavior affects team members. In order to make the leadership process more elaborate, what we would need is how a leader can more usefully influence team members. In other words, the influence process is composed of two elements, which are exchange influence process and reformative influence process.