기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
The Effects of Special Aesthetic Activities on Cultivating Students’ Creativity
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • The Effects of Special Aesthetic Activities on Cultivating Students’ Creativity
  • 특수 미적 체험 활동이 어린이들의 창의성에 미치는 영향
저자명
Insun KUK
간행물명
조형교육KCI
권/호정보
2014년|50권 (통권50호)|pp.167-196 (30 pages)
발행정보
한국조형교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트(0.54MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

영문초록

Recently, it seems that importance of creativity is more emphasized in general education. Under this circumstance, creativity is core theme in the field of arts education. There has been research in and even out of the field of arts education that involvement in the arts is associated with gains in cognitive ability, creative thinking. Therefore, developing effective art lessons with special aesthetic activities for children’s creativity has been an important role in arts education. In order to help children develop their creativity, we must think how teachers can design effective activities in art lessons. “Drawing with special aesthetic activities” is when the teacher provides a specific drawing lesson combining music and literature for the students so they can create their own ideas and therefore advance their creativity. Art education has been theorized as a way for children to develop their creative achievement. Yet, there has been little research conducted into arts education to deliver original strategic and creative thinking, and examined how the development of creativity through drawing with special aesthetic activities in arts class. The research tool was the Test for Creative Thinking - Drawing Production (TCT-DP) which was developed by Jellen and Urban. researcher selected a random sample to take this test from a local intermediate school. This study introduced 176 students teachers’ creative classroom research using special aesthetic activities and explained how this project was initiated, what was the process of the project and how special aesthetic activities help students develop their creativity. The result of this study shows that the special aesthetic activity is a way where this learning and creative functioning can take place in large part because it provides the space for students and teachers to negotiate what is important in arts education, and for them to pursue arts education in the way real children do: as an educational and creative meaning making activity.

국문초록

본 연구는 특수 미적 체험 활동을 바탕으로 한 미술, 문학 및 음악 과목을 융합한 통합 수업을 활용함으로써 초등학교 어린이들의 창의성 개발이라는 교육 의 가치를 고찰하였다. 그것으로 특수 미적 체험을 통한 통합수업을 연구 기간 동안 실제로 전개하 였으며 아동들의 연구 전·후의 표현 결과, 비교 분석과 수업 전개 후 지도 한 결과 분석 및 인터뷰로 알아 본 아동들의 인식 변화를 통하여 연구를 검증하고 평가 하였다. 그 결과 첫째, 특수 미적 체험 활동을 통해 자신들이 그리는 환경이나 세계와 대화하고 그 표현을 통해 아동들의 사고는 확장 되어 가고 고정관념에 의한 편향 성에서도 많이 벗어나는 등 자기표현이 향상되어지고 미적 정보를 수집하고 탐색 하는 능동적 사고 활동으로 이어져 창의적인 표현 활동으로 전개되었다. 둘째, 특수 미적 체험 활동을 통한 실제감 속에서 이미지가 형성되면서 자신 만의 독창적인 표현을 바탕으로 개성적인 표현 및 생각과 느낌을 표현하게 함으로 써 창의적인 표현 능력이 신장 되었다. 셋째, 자기의 미적 체험을 그림으로 표현하면서 자기 내면의 표현은 물론 나 아가 심상의 세계와 창의적인 사고의 신장으로 집중력과 학습에 흥미를 얻어 다른 교과 능력 향상 및 학교생활 전반에 걸쳐 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 즉, 본 연구에서와 같이 학생들은 미술, 문학 및 음악 과목을 융합한 통합 수업 에 참여하며 특수 미적 체험 활동을 통한 표현, 감상 능력을 기르고, 심미적인 표현 의 기회를 늘리며, 생동감 넘치는 상상력 표현을 통해 창의성을 어떻게 발전시켜 나갈 것인가를 배웠으며, 이러한 즐거운 활동들은 아동들에게 확고한 자신감과 기 대감을 만들어 주었다. 그 결과, 특수 미적 체험 활동은 미술시간에만 활용되는 일반적인 범주를 뛰어넘어, 어린이들의 창의성 향상과 정서함양에 대한 의미 뿐 아니라 , 창의성 향상에 관한 연구의 내재적 가치와 그 가능성을 열어 줄 것이다.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
II. Arts Education and Creativity
III. Developing Children’s Creativity through the Arts
IV. Discussion and Implication
V. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (66건)

  • Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.
  • Anderson, T., & Milbrandt, K. (2005). Art for life: Authentic instruction in art. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
  • Anderson, W., & Lawrence, J. (2001). Integrating music into the elementary classroom (5th edition). Stanford, CA: Wads worth/Thomason learning.
  • Bamford, A. (2006). The wow factor: global rearch compendium on the impack of art in education. New York: Waxmann Munster.
  • Bertram, T., & Pascal, C. (2002). What counts in early learning. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Beyer, B. K. (1991). Teaching thinking skills: A handbook for elementary school teachers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Burton, J. (1999). Learning an and through the arts: Curriculum Implications. In Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning, ed. E. Fiske. (online report) (Washington, DC: The Arts Education Partnership and the President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities, 1999). Available at Org/champions.
  • Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A. (1991). Handbook of gifted education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Coskun, H. (2005). The effect of divergent thinking and group composition on idea generation in brain writing. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 20(55), 25-42.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Doyle, W. (1990). Classroom management techniques. In O. C., Moles(Ed.), Student discipline strategies: Research and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Eisenberg, R., Armeli, S., & Pretz, J. (1998). Can promise of reward increase creativity? Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 74(3), 704 714.
  • Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of the mind. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
  • Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Frey, K. S., Greenberg, M. T., Haynes, N. M.,...Shriver, T. P. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. Alexandria. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Emmer, E. T., & Evertson, C. M. (1981). Synthesis of research on classroom management. Educational Leadership, 51(8), 12-15.
  • Engeström, Y. (1993a). Developmental studies of work as a test bench of activity theory: The case of intermediate care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64-103). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Engeström, Y. (1993b). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Meittinen, & R-L Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives in activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ewing, R., & Gibson, R. (2007). Creative teaching or teaching creatively? Using creative arts strategies in preservice teacher education. Waikato Journal of Education, 13 (Special issue on creative research and the Arts), 159-179.
  • Fishman, M. (2004). Creating art, creating citizens. In M. Checker & M. Fishman (Eds.), Local actions, pp. 51-70. New York, NY: Coumbia University Press.
  • Fiske, E. (Ed.) (1999). Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning. Washington DC: Arts Partnership & President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities.
  • Fontenot, N. A. (1992). Effects of training in creativity and creative problem finding upon business people. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 11-22.
  • Freedman, K., & Suhr, P. (2004). Curriculum change for the 21stcentury: Visual culturein art education. In E. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education(pp. 823-824). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gaudelius, Y., & Speirs, P. (2001). Contemporary issues in art education. NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. NewYork:Bantam Books.
  • Goleman , D., Kaufman, P., & M. Ray. (1992). The creative spirit. New York: Penguin.
  • Gude, O. (2009). Olivia Gude: New School Art Styles, Personal Quotes from Power Point Presentation
  • Gulbenkian, C. (1982). The Arts in School. London: Callouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
  • Hedegaard, M. (2009). Children’s development from a cultural-historical approach: Children’s activity in everyday local settings as foundation for their development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(1), 64-81.
  • Hetland, L., & Winner, E. (2004). Cognitive transfer from arts education to non arts outcomes: Research evidence and policy implications. In E. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Isenberg, J. P., & Jalongo, M. R. (2001). Creative expression and play in early childhood (3rded.). Upper Saddle River, NewJersey: Merril lPrentice Hall
  • Johnson, J. E., Christie, J., & Yawkey, T. D. (1999). Play and early childhood development(2ndedition). NewYork: Addison, Wesley, & Longman.
  • Kashdan, T. B., & Fincham, F. D. (2002). Facilitating creativity by regulating curiosity. American Psychologist, 57(5), 373-376.
  • Lasky, L., & Mukerji, R. (1980). Art: Basic for young children. Washington, DC: National association for the Education of young children.
  • Lippman, Matthew. (1988). Philosophy Goes to School. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Lobman, C. (2010). Creating developmental moments: Teaching and leaming as creative activites. In M. C. Conny, V. P. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane(Eds), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making and the arts(pp. 199-214). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Maslow, A. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. NewYork: The Viking Press
  • Mayesky, M. (2006). Creative activities for young children. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Munn, P., Johnstone, M., & Chalmers, V. (1990). How do teachers talk about maintaining effective discipline in their classrooms? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
  • Osborn, A. (1963). Applied imagination. New York, NY: Charles Scribner & Sons.
  • Pagel, D. (2002). An Imaginative Connection Between Art and Science. L.A.Times. May 1.
  • Parsons, M. J., & Blocker, G. (1993). Aesthetics and Education. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Pickard, E. (1990). Toward a theory of creative potential. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(1), 1-9.
  • Prentice, R. (2000). Creativity: a reaffirmation of its place in early childhood education, Curriculum Journal, 11(2), 145-58.
  • Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. West Sussex: Capstone Publishing.
  • Rogers, C. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Personality. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Ronco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Boston, MA:Elsevier
  • Sanford, J. P., Emmer, E. T., & Clements, B. S. (1983). Improving classroom management. Educational Leadership, 40(7), 56-60.
  • Saracho, O. N., & Spodek, B. (1998). Multiple Perspectives on Play in Early Childhood. Education. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Schirrmacher, R. (1998). Art and Creative Development for Young Children (3rd Ed). ITP: Delmar Publishers.
  • Singer, J. L., & Singer, D. G. (1998). Imaginative play and human development: Schemas, scripts, and possibilities. In D. Bergen (Ed.), Play asamedium for learning and development (pp.63-66). Olney, MD., Association for Childhood Education International.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Creativity for the new millennium. American Psychologist, 56(4), 360-362.
  • Sullivan, G. (1993). Art-based art education: Learning that is meaningful, authentic, critical and pluralist. Studies in Art Education. 35(1), 5-21.
  • Tegano, D. W., Moran, J. D., & Sawyer, J. K. (1991). Creativity in early childhood classrooms. NEA (National Education Association) Early Childhood Education Series.
  • Thomas, G. V., & Silk, A. M. J. (1990). An introduction to the psychology of children’s drawings. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheat Sheaf.
  • Torrance, P. E., & Goff, K. (1989). A quiet revolution. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23, 136-145.
  • Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1985). Der TSD-Z: Test Zum schöpferischen Denken – zeichnerisch. Universität Hannover, Arbeitsstelle HEFE, Paper 6.
  • Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1986). Assessing creative potential via production: The Test for creative Thinking – Drawing Production (TCT-DP). In A. J. Cropley, K.K. Urban, H. Wagner and W. Wieczerkowski (Eds.), Giftedness: A Continuing Worldwide Challenge (pp. 163-169). New York, NY: Trillium.
  • Vinacke, W. E. (1952). The psychology of thinking. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London, UK, Falmer Press.
  • Wilson, R., Wood, L., & Gaff, J. (1974). Social-psychological accessibility and facultystudent interaction beyond the classroom. Sociology of Education, 47, 74-92.
  • Zavitkovsky, D. (2001). Docia Zavitkovsky on creativity and young Children (An interview). Early Childhood Today, 15(5), 41. 94
  • Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? New York: Teachers College Press.
구매하기 (5,900)
추천 연관논문