기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
어음명료지수의 측정과 적용
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 어음명료지수의 측정과 적용
  • Measurements and Applications of the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII),대역가청함수, 보청기, 어음명료지수, 조음지수, 주파수중요함수
저자명
김건구,진인기
간행물명
Audiology and Speech ResearchKCI,SCOPUS
권/호정보
2015년|11권 3호(통권22호)|pp.186-195 (10 pages)
발행정보
한국청각언어재활학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.43MB)
주제분야
특수교육학
서지반출

국문초록

영문초록

Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) is a model that predicts speech intelligibility based on a person’s hearing thresholds and audible speech cues in given frequency bands. The SII is able to predict how loss of audibility due to hearing loss affects intelligibility of speech. Thus, the SII has been applied clinically in evaluation and fitting for hearing aids to quantify how much audibility is compensated by amplification. Although the SII known as Articulation Index was first introduced during the 20th century, calculation methods and aspects of the SII have been continually refined and developed for clinical use. This article provides (1) a brief history of the SII, (2) a view of components and calculation methods of the SII, (3) a review of applications for clinical use, and (4) a discussion of limitations and aspects that need to be considered for clinical applications in future.

목차

INTRODUCTION
A REVIEW OF COMPONENTS AND CALCULATION METHODS OF THE SII
A REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL USE
DISCUSSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (38건)

  • 이경원 & 김진숙. (2012). 한국 단음절어의 주파수중 요기능 연구. 청능재활, 8(1), 24-33.
  • Abel, S. M., Sass-Kortsak, A., & Naugler, J. J. (2000). The role of high-frequency hearing in age-related speech understanding deficits. Scandinavian Audiology, 29(3), 131-138.
  • Amlani, A. M., Punch, J. L., & Ching, T. Y. C. (2002). Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting. Trends in Amplification, 6(3), 81-129.
  • ANSI. (1997/R2012). S3. 5-1997, Methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index. New York: American National Standards Institute.
  • Ching, T. Y., Dillon, H., Katsch, R., & Byrne, D.2001). Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting. Ear and Hearing, 22(3), 212-224.
  • DePaolis, R. A., Janota, C. P., & Frank, T. (1996). Frequency importance functions for words, sentences, and continuous discourse. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39(4), 714-723.
  • Dillon, H. (1999). NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids. The Hearing Journal, 52(4), 10-12.
  • Dubno, J. R., Dirks, D. D., & Ellison, D. E. (1989). Stop‐consonant recognition for normal‐hearing listeners and listeners with high‐frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(1), 347-354.
  • Dubno, J. R., Dirks, D. D., & Morgan, D. E. (1984). Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(1), 87-96.
  • Dunn, H. K. & White, S. D. (1940). Statistical measurement on conversational speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 11(3), 278-288.
  • Fletcher, H. & Galt, R. H. (1950). The perception of speech and its relation to telephony. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22(2), 89-151.
  • French, N. R. & Steinberg, J. C. (1947). Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 19(1), 90-119.
  • Hargus, S. E. & Gordon-Salant, S. (1995). Accuracy of speech intelligibility index predictions for noisemasked young listeners with normal hearing and for elderly listeners with hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38(1), 234-243.
  • Healy, E. W., Yoho, S. E., & Apoux, F. (2013). Band importance for sentences and words reexamined. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(1), 463-473.
  • Humes, L. E. (1986). An evaluation of several rationales for selecting hearing aid gain. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51(3), 272-281.
  • Humes, L. E. & Roberts, L. (1990). Speech recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly The contributions of audibility. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 33(4), 726-735.
  • Humes, L. E., Coughlin, M., & Talley, L. (1996). Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 419-427.
  • Humes, L. E., Watson, B. U., Christensen, L. A., Cokely, C. G., Halling, D. C., & Lee, L. (1994). Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37(2), 465-474.
  • Jerger, J., Jerger, S., Oliver, T., & Pirozzolo, F. (1989). Speech understanding in the elderly. Ear and Hearing, 10(2), 79-89.
  • Jin, I. K., Kates, J. M., & Arehart, K. H. (2014). Dynamic range for speech materials in korean, english, and mandarin: A cross-language comparison. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(5), 2024-2030.
  • Kamm, C. A., Dirks, D. D., & Bell, T. S. (1985). Speech recognition and the articulation index for normal and hearing‐impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77(1), 281-288.
  • Keidser, G., Dillon, H. R., Flax, M., Ching, T., & Brewer, S. (2011). The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Audiology Research, 1(1), 24.
  • Killion, M. C. & Mueller, H. G. (2010). Twenty years later: A NEW count-the-dots method. The Hearing Journal, 63(1), 10-12.
  • Killion, M. C., Mueller, H. G., Pavlovic, C. V., & Humes, L. E. (1993). A is for audibility. The Hearing Journal, 46(4), 29-32.
  • Kim, M. & Pae, S. (2007). The international guide to speech acquisition: Korean speech acquisition. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
  • Kryter, K. D. (1962). Methods for the calculation and use of the articulation index. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34(11), 1689-1697.
  • Mueller, H. G. & Killion, M. C. (1990). An easy method for calculating the articulation index. The Hearing Journal, 43(9), 14-17.
  • Pavlovic, C. V. (1984). Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(4), 1253-1258.
  • Pavlovic, C. V. & Studebaker, G. A. (1984). An evaluation of some assumption underlying the articulation index. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(5), 1606-1612.
  • Pavlovic, C. V., Studebaker, G. A., & Sherbecoe, R. L. (1986). An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing‐impaired individuals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80(1), 50-57.
  • Rankovic, C. M. (1991). An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(2), 391-402.
  • Schum, D. J., Matthews, L. J., & Lee, F. S. (1991). Actual and predicted word-recognition performance of elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(3), 636-642.
  • Smit, A. B. (2007). The international guide to speech acquisition: General American English speech acquisition. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delama Learning.
  • Studebaker, G. A. (1992). The effect of equating loudness on audibility-based hearing aid selection procedures. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 3(2), 113-118.
  • Studebaker, G. A. & Sherbecoe, R. L. (1991). Frequencyimportance and transfer functions for recorded CID W-22 word lists. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(2), 427-438.
  • Studebaker, G. A., Sherbecoe, R. L., & Gilmore, C. (1993). Frequency-importance and transfer functions for the Auditec of St. Louis recordings of the NU-6 word test. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(4), 799-807.
  • Studebaker, G. A., Sherbecoe, R. L., McDaniel, D. M., & Gray, G. A. (1997). Age-related changes in monosyllabic word recognition performance when audibility is held constant. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8, 150-162.
  • Wong, L. L. N., Ho, A. H., Chua, E. W., & Soli, S. D. (2007). Development of the Cantonese speech intelligibility index. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2350-2361.
구매하기 (3,000)
추천 연관논문