기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
무동기의 발달양상에 따른 잠재계층 분류 및 영향요인 검증
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 무동기의 발달양상에 따른 잠재계층 분류 및 영향요인 검증
  • Latent classes of differential developmental trajectories of amotivation and parenting behaviors as predictors of classes
저자명
이은주
간행물명
교육학연구KCI
권/호정보
2015년|53권 1호(통권165호)|pp.111-135 (25 pages)
발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.57MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구에서는 중2에서 고2에 이르는 4년 동안 학생들의 무동기가 어떻게 변화하는지 알아보는 데 목적이 있었다. 특히 무동기의 발달양상에 따른 잠재계층을 분류하고 부모의 양육구조가 이러한 이질 적인 무동기의 발달양상에 미치는 상대적 영향력은 어떠한지 알아보았다. 한국교육개발원의 한국교육 종단조사 2, 3, 5차년도 자료를 사용하여 성장혼합모델을 적용한 결과, 중2에서 고2에 걸쳐 학생들의 학업 무동기는 전반적으로 증가하는 경향이 있지만, 무동기가 변화하는 양상에 따라 4개의 잠재집단이 확인되었다(빠른증가형, 느린증가형, 빠른감소형, 느린감소형). 약 80%의 학생들은 중2에서 고2까지 무 동기가 점차 증가하는 양상을 나타낸 반면 나머지 20%의 학생들은 오히려 무동기가 감소하고 있었다. 모든 잠재집단에서 무동기의 초기치에 대한 유의미한 예측요인은 성별이었으며, 여학생에 비해 남학생 일수록 무동기의 초기치가 높았다. 모든 잠재집단에서 부모의 정서적 지원은 무동기의 변화율에 대해 유의미한 부적효과가 있었다. 즉, 무동기가 증가하는 두 집단(느린증가형 및 빠른증가형)에서 정서지원 이 높을수록 무동기가 천천히 증가하는 반면, 무동기가 감소하는 두 집단(느린감소형 및 빠른감소형) 의 경우 정서지원이 높을수록 무동기가 빠르게 감소하는 경향이 있었다. 부모의 정서적 지원이 높은 경우 무동기의 증가경향은 다소 완화되고 감소경향은 촉진될 수 있음을 의미한다. 본 연구의 의의 및 후속연구에 대한 제언이 논의되었다.

영문초록

This study was to identify differential pattern of developmental trajectories of amotivation and to examine whether parenting behaviors were differentially related with the initial status and rate of change in amotivation across the classes. From 5,241 students in the KELS Study, the present study identified four trajectory patterns of amotivation in Grades 7~10: a slowly increasing group(56%), fast increasing group(25%), slowly decreasing group(16%) and fast decreasing group(3%). Although the majority of students(80%) showed decrease in amotivation, another 20% of students showed increase in amotivation. Gender was related to initial levels of amotivation across the four classes; Boys were more likely to have higher levels of amotivation. Emotional supports of parents were significantly and negatively related with the rate of change in amotivation across the four classes. Students of two increasing classes with more emotionally supportive parents had a smaller increase in amotivation, whereas students of two decreasing classes with more emotionally supportive parents had a greater decrease in amotivation. It indicates that emotional support of parents alleviates the increase in amotivation among students with increasing trajectories, whereas it fosters the decline in amotivation among those with decreasing trajectories of amotivation. Implications for future research and intervention were discussed.

목차

I. 서 론
II. 이론적 배경
III. 연구방법
IV. 연구결과
V. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (40건)

  • 김남희·이정윤(2013). 지각된 부모자녀관계가 중학생의 학습몰입에 미치는 영향: 자기결정성 동기의 매개효과. 청소년상담연구, 21(1), 211-231. (Translated in English) Kim, N., & Lee, J. (2013). Relationship between perceived parent-adolescent relationship and the middle school students' learning. Korea Journal of Youth Counseling, 21(1), 211-231.
  • 김신아·오인수(2014). 부모와 교사의 지원 및 성취압력이 학업성취집단별 자기결정성 동기에 미치는 영향. 교육과학연구, 45(1), 29-52. (Translated in English) Kim, S. & Oh, I. (2014). Effect of support and accomplishing pressure of parents and teachers on students’ self-determination motivation in terms of academic achievement. Journal of Educational Studies, 45(1), 29-52.
  • 김아영(2002). 자기결정성 이론에 따른 학습동기 유형 분류체계의 타당성. 교육심리연구, 16(4), 169-187. (Translated in English) Kim, A. Y. (2002). Validation of taxonomy of academic motivation based on the self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology Research, 28(3), 477-499.
  • 김아영(2008). 한국 청소년의 학업동기 발달. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(1), 111-132. (Translated in English) Kim, A. Y. (2008). Korean society and educational achievement: Academic achievement of Korean adolescents : The development of academic motivation among Korean adolescents. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 14(1), 111-132.
  • 박영신·김의철·정갑순(2004). 한국 청소년의 부모자녀관계와 성취에 대한 종단연구: 자기효능감과 성취동기를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 10(3), 37-59. (Translated in English) Park, Y-S., Kim, U., & Chung, K. (2004). Longitudinal analysis of the influence of parent-child relationship on adolescents’ academic achievement: With specific focus on the mediating role of self-efficacy and achievement motivation. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 10(3), 37-59.
  • 신종호·진성조·김연제(2010). 지각된 부모의 학업지원, 성취기대, 일상통제가 학업성취 수준에 따라 자기결정성 동기에 미치는 영향. 교육심리연구, 24(1), 121-137. (Translated in English) Shin, J. H., Jin, S. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2010). The influence of perceived parental academic support, achievement expectation and daily control on children’s self-determination motivation according to their academic achievement Level. Journal of Educational Psychology Research, 24(1), 121-137. 이은주(2001). 몰입에 대한 학습동기와 인지전략의 관계. 교육심리연구, 15(3), 199-216. (Translated in English) The
  • 이희선·권영애(2012). 초등학교 고학년 아동이 지각한 어머니의 심리적 통제와 자기주도적 학습과의 관계: 자기결정성동기의 매개효과 검증. 대한가정학회지, 50(8), 125-135. (Translated in English) Lee, H. S. & Kwon, Y. A. (2012). The Relationships between mother’s psychological control and self-directed learning ability in elementary school students: Focusing on the mediating effects of self-determined motivation. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 50(8), 125-135.
  • 임성애·이은주(2014). 자율적 동기와 타율적 동기의 공동발달. 교육심리연구, 28(2), 251-271. (Translated in English) Lim, S. A. & Lee, E. J. (2014). Longitudinal Co-development of Autonomous and Controlled Motivation: The Predictive Effects of Parental Factors. Journal of Educational Psychology Research, 28(2), 251-271.
  • 최현주·조민희(2014). 자기결정성 이론에 따른 학습동기 변화의 잠재프로파일 분류 및 영향요인 검증. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 11(1), 253-274. (Translated in English) Choi, H. J. & Cho, M. H. (2014). Identifying latent classes in adolescent’s self-determination motivation and testing determinants of classes. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 11(1), 253-274.
  • Baker, S. R. (2004). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientation: Their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance. Current Psychology, 23(3), 189-202.
  • Beyer, S. (1995). Maternal employment and children’s academic achievement: Parenting styles as a mediating variable. Developmental Review, 15(2), 212–253.
  • Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of student self-regulation and instructor autonomy support on learning in a college-level natural science course: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.
  • Bouffard, T., Boileau, L., & Vezeau, C (2001). Students' transition from elementary to high school and changes of the relationship between motivation and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(4), 589-604.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  • Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 519-533.
  • Froiland, J. M. (2011). Parental autonomy support and student learning goals: A preliminary examination of an intrinsic motivation intervention. Child Youth Care Forum, 40, 135-149.
  • Furrer, C. & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162.
  • Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3-13.
  • Grolnick, W. S. (2003). The psychology of parental control: How well-meant parenting backfires. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., Senécal, C., & Dowson, M. (2008). Representations of relatedness with parents and friends and autonomous academic motivation during the late adolescence–early adulthood period: Reciprocal or unidirectional effects? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 621-637.
  • Hagborg, W. J. (1995). Gender and motivational orientation among high school students. ERIC, ED415225, 316-330.
  • Hardre, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students' intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 347-356.
  • Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17, 300–312.
  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509-527.
  • Joussemet, M., Landry, R., & Koestner, R. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on parenting. Canadian Psychology, 49, 194-200.
  • Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelleiter, K.(2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567-582.
  • Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196.
  • Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B. & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 351-373.
  • Meece, J. L. & Jones, M. G. (1996). Gender differences in motivation and strategy use in science: Are girls rote learners? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 393-404.
  • Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (1998-2010). Mplus User’Guide (Sixth ed.). LA, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Niemiec, C. P., Lynch, M. F., Vansteenkiste, M., Bernstein, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). The antecedents and consequences of autonomous self-regulation for college: A self-determination theory perspective on socialization. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 761-775.
  • Ntoumanis, N., Pensgaard, A., Martin, C., & Pipe, K. (2004). An idiographic analysis of amotivation in compulsory school physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 197-214.
  • Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124-139.
  • Patrick, H., Kaplan, A., & Ryan, A. M. (2011). Positive classroom motivational environments: convergence between mastery goal structure and classroom social climate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 367-382.
  • Shen, B., Winger, R., Li, W., Sun, H., & Rukavina, P. (2010). An amotivation model in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 72-84.
  • Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in three life domains. The role of parents' and teachers' autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589-604.
  • Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., & Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: the unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 342–358.
  • Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1994). Children’s competence beliefs, achievement values, and general self-esteem: Change across elementary and middle school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 107-138.
구매하기 (5,400)
추천 연관논문