기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
장바구니
 고객센터
본문검색
  • 검색 히스토리
실시간 인기검색어
서지반출
미국 교사 자격 기준안을 통한 우리나라 중등 과학 교사 1차 선발고사 문항의 분석
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 미국 교사 자격 기준안을 통한 우리나라 중등 과학 교사 1차 선발고사 문항의 분석
  • An Analysis of the Primary Examination for Selecting Secondary School Science Teachers in Korea Using the US Science Teachers Preparation Standards
ㆍ 저자명
이영희
ㆍ 간행물명
교과교육학연구KCI
ㆍ 권/호정보
2015년|19권 1호(통권50호)|pp.113-136 (24 pages)
ㆍ 발행정보
이화여자대학교 교과교육연구소|한국
ㆍ 파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(6.73MB)
ㆍ 주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

교육의질을결정하는우수한교사를양성하고선발하는기능은교사교육의핵심이며이에따라 우리나라에서도교사임용시험의중요성은누구나인정하는부분이다. 특히교사임용시험은교사 를선발하는목적적인기능외에도임용시험에서의출제빈도와내용들이예비과학교사에게교사 전문성을이해하고학습하는과정이라는점에서그중요성이크다.이와같은중요성에따라본연 구는2008학년도부터2013학년도까지지난6년간우리나라중등과학교사임용시험의객관식문항 을 미국의 NSTA와 NCATE이 제안한 과학교사준비를 위한 기준요소(Standards for Science Teacher Preparation, 2003, 2012)와TEA(Texas Education Agency)의교사자격시험인TExES (Texas Examinations of Educator Standards, 2013)에서 제시하는 과학교사 기준틀(Science Educator Standards)을바탕으로한9가지기준요소로분석하여우리나라중등과학교사선발시험 에서중요하게평가하고있는요소와상대적으로간과되고있는요소들을보고자하였다.분석결 과로는우리나라중등과학교사선발요소는과학의본성(Nature of Science),탐구(Inquiry),교육 학이론(Pedagogical Theories),그리고교과과정(Curriculum)에대한내용을전체임용시험의약 90%의비중으로강조하여평가하고있으며,반면에실험실안전및윤리(Safety&Ethics),과학, 기술 및 사회의 관계(STS: Science, Technology and Society), 과학 교육 공학(Tools and Technology), 그리고통합영역(Integration)등은거의간과되고있는것으로관찰되었다. 시대의 변화와교육의변화라는요구에따라서교사교육및평가의변화또한요구되고있다. 21세기에들 어서창의적이고통합적인교과과정을제시하고있는시점에서시대의요구를반영한수준높은교 사전문성의양성을위하여우리나라중등과학교사임용시험에서도구체적이고 체계적인교사선 발기준안과임용시험출제영역을제시하고그것에근거하여최신과학교과교육이론등을포함 한다양한내용요소들의평가가이루어질필요가있다.

영문초록

Given the great impact of teachers on the quality of education, much attention has been placed on the evaluation of effectiveness for teacher preparation programs. As such, no one denies the importance of the teacher selection examination in Korea. This is because not only (does) the examination is to select teachers for the classrooms, but it also influences significantly the curriculum and instruction in teacher preparation programs in colleges. This study analyzed the test items of science PCK (Pedagogical Content Knowledge) that were included in the primary examinations of 2008 to 2013 for recruiting secondary school science teachers in Korea using the Standards for Science Teacher Preparation (NSTA & NCATE, 2003, 2012) and the Texas Examinations of Educator Standards [TExES] (TEA, 2013). The findings show that while some of the standards such as the nature of science (NOS), inquiry, pedagogical theories, and curriculum have been emphasized on the examinations, other important standards including safety & ethics, STS, tools & technology and integration have been ignored. Currently, since the innovative education has been launched in the curriculum and instruction along with the new goals of education in Korea, there is a great need for the innovation of teacher education programs including research-based standards for the examination in order to reflect the current goals and emphasis in education.

목차

I. 서 론
II. 연구방법
III. 연구 결과 및 논의
IV. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

키워드

교사교육교사선발기준요소교사임용시험과학교사전문성Teacher EducationTeacher Preparation ProgramsTeacher SelectionStandards of Science Teachers Preparation

참고문헌 (48건)

  • 김미연(2009). 초등학교 과학 실험 수업에서 실험 안전에 관한 교사와 학생들의 인식과 태도 조사. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문.
  • 강희정, 김희백(2009). 경력 교사의 수업 전문성 발달에 영향을 미치는 요인: 모형 활용 생물 수업을 중심으로. 생물교육학회지, 37(1), 21-37.
  • 김희경 (2007). 과학 교사의 전문성 계발 프로그램의 조건과 모형. 초등과학교육학회지, 26(3), 295-308.
  • 김교흥, 심규철, 김현섭, 박영철(2004). 중등 생물 예비교사를 위한 교육과정과 생물교사 임용 고사와의 관련성 분석. 생물교육학회지, 32(2), 142-157.
  • 곽영순(2006). 중등 과학교사들이 말하는 교과교육학 지식의 의미와 교직 전문성 제고 방안. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(4), 527-536.
  • 권재술, 김범기, 우종옥, 정완호, 정진우, 최병순(2006). 과학교육론, 서울: 교육과학사.
  • 이봉우, 심규철, 신명경, 김종희, 최재혁, 박은미, 윤지현, 권용주, 김용진(2013a). 중등과학교사 임용시험 문항에 나타난 과학교육학 이론의 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 33(4), 794-806.
  • 이봉우, 심규철, 신명경, 김종희, 최재혁, 박은미, 윤지현, 권용주, 김용진(2013b). 예비과학교사에게 필요한 과학교육학 이론에 대한 과학교육 연구자들의 의견과 증등과학교사 임용시험의 연관성. 한국과학교육학회지, 33(4), 826-839.
  • 이영희(2013). 질적 연구에 의한 고등학교 생명과학 I 교과서 생명과학의 이해단원에 내포된 과학의 본성 분석. 교과교육학연구, 17(1), 173-197.
  • 맹희주, 손연아(2011). 과학 수업에서 통합적 적용 경험에 따른 초등학교 교사들의 통합 과학 교육에 대한 인식 및 교과교육학 지식(PCK)의 차이 분석. 초등과학교육학회지, 30(4), 601-614.
  • 남정희, Mayer V.J., 최준환, 임재항(2007). 예비 과학교사의 과학의 본성에 대한 인식. 한국과학교육학회지, 27(3), 253-262.
  • 심규철(2010). 영국의 과학 교사 양성 프로그램 분석 연구: 영국 로햄튼 대학교를 중심으로. 생물교육학회지, 38(3), 492- 506.
  • 심규철, 김정민(2008). 수업 실기 대회를 통한 생물과 예비 교사의 수업 실기 능력 제고 방안 연구. 생물교육학회지, 36(1), 85-94.
  • 심재호(2006). 과학교사 전문성과 실험 연수에 대한 중등 과학 교사의 인식. 생물교육학회지, 34(1), 27-37.
  • 조희형, 김희경, 윤희숙, 이기영(2011). 과학교육의 이론과 실제, 서울: 교육과학사.
  • Akerson, V. L., Buzzelli, C., & Donnelly, L. A.(2010). On the nature of teaching nature of science: Preservice early childhood teachers’ instruction in preschool and elementary settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 213-233.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).(1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).(1993). Benchmarks for Scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bales, B.(2007). Teacher education reform in the United Sates and the theoretical constructs of stakeholder mediation. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 2(6). (http://www.ijepl.org) Accessed: May 27 2012.
  • Chiappetta, E. L. & Koballa, T. R. (7th ed.).(2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
  • Cochran-Smith, M.(2008). The new teacher education in the United States: directions forward. Teacher and Teaching. Theory and Practice, 14, 271-282.
  • Fenstermacher, G. D. (Ed.).(1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: three aspects. In M. C. Wittrock, Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.
  • Furlong, J., Mcnamara, O., Campbell, A., Howson, J., & Lewis, S.(2008). Partnership, policy and polictics: initial teacher education in England under New labour. Teachers and Teaching. Theory and Practice, 14, 307-318.
  • Inoue, N.(2009). Rehearsing to teach: content-specific deconstruction of instructional explanations in pre-service teacher training. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(1), 47-60.
  • Lampert, M.(1995). How do teachers manage to teach?: Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard educational Review, 55(2), 178-194.
  • Lin, C. Y., Hu, R., & Changlai, M. L.(2005). Science curriculum components favored by Taiwaneses biology teachers. Research in Science Education, 35, 269-280.
  • Martina, M. A., Raymond, D., & Gathier, C.(2001). Teacher training: Orientations and Professional Competencies. Ministry of Education, Quebec, Canada.
  • Millar, R. & Osborne, J.(1998). Beyond 2000. Science education for the future, London: King's College.
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)(2008). [Physics] Standards of Certification for Science Teachers with the Criteria and Components of Assessment. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Science Technology.
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)(2008). [Chemistry] Standards of Certification for Science Teachers with the Criteria and Components of Assessment. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Science Technology.
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)(2008). [Biology] Standards of Certification for Science Teachers with the Criteria and Components of Assessment. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Science Technology.
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)(2008). [Earth Science] Standards of Certification for Science Teachers with the Criteria and Components of Assessment. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Science Technology.
  • Ministry of Education and Science Technology (MEST)(2009). Handbook of Science Education Curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Science Technology.
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)(2011). Science Education Curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)(2012). The ways of improving for the system of examination for appointing secondary school science teachers. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Science Technology.
  • National Academy of Education(2013). Evaluation of teacher preparation programs: Purposes, methods, and policy options. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
  • National Council for Accrediation of Teacher Education (NCATE)(2003). Standards for Science Teacher Preparation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC).(1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC).(2012). A framework for K-12 science education, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Science Teacxhers Association (NSTA).(1982). Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980s(An NSTA position statement). Washington, DC: Author.
  • National Science Teachers Association (NSTA).(2003). Standards for Science Teacher Preparation. (http://www.nsta.org/pdfs/NSTAstandards2003.pdf) Accessed: April 14 2014.
  • National Science Teachers Association (NSTA).(2012). Standards for Science Teacher Preparation. (http://www.nsta.org/preservice/docs/2012NSTAPreserviceScienceStandards.pdf) Accessed: April 14 2014.
  • Odom, A. L., Stoddard, E. R., & LaNasa, S. M.(2007). Teacher practices and middle-school science achievements. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1329-1346.
  • Schwab, J. J.(1962). The teaching of science as inquiry. In J. Schwab & P. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Sergiovani, T. J., & Starratt, R. J.(1983). Supervision: Human Perspectives. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.
  • Texas Education Agency (TEA).(2013). Examinations of Educator Standards (TExES). Science Educator Standards.(http://cms.texes-ets.org/texes/prepmaterials/texes-preparation-manuals/) Accessed: April 15. 2014.
  • Yeau, S., Kang, S., & Shim, K.(2003). Investigation on the Realities and Teachers' Perception of Secondary School Science In-service Education. The Korean Society of Biology Education, 31(4), 339-346.
  • Zembylas, M.(2007). Emotional ecology: The intersection of emotional knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 355-367.
구매하기 (5,300)
장바구니
추천 연관논문