다집단 인지진단모형의 적용 가능성 탐색 :청소년 정서·행동문제 검사에의 적용

김성은

서지반출

국문초록

본 연구는 심리검사에 인지진단모형을 적용하여 그 적용 가능성과 유용성을 탐색하고자 청소년 정 서·행동문제 측정 검사에 인지진단모형을 적용하였다. 또한 일반 인지진단모형과 다집단 인지진단모 형을 모두 활용하여 분석하고 적합성을 비교 및 선택하여 검사 결과를 해석하였다. 아동?청소년 패 널조사의 3차년도(2012년)인 중학교 3학년 학생 2,245명을 대상으로 분석한 결과, 모형 적합도 면에서 는 성별과 학업성취를 집단 구분 변수로 활용한 다집단 인지진단모형이 적절한 것으로 나타났다. 다 집단 G-DINA를 적용하여 여자 청소년은 불안과 우울의 내재화, 남자 청소년은 주의력 결핍과 과잉 행동, 공격행동의 외현화 경향을 보이는 것과 학업성취가 낮을수록 정서?행동문제가 심화되는 경향 을 확인하였으며, 성취수준이 높은 집단의 학업불안 경향도 나타났다. 또한 집단 효과를 통제하여 모 수를 추정할 수 있고 한 문항이 여러 요소를 측정하는 경우에도 분석이 가능하다는 점 그리고 분석 결과를 개인과 집단 수준에서 다차원적으로 활용할 수 있다는 점에서 심리검사결과 분석에 다집단 인 지진단모형이 유용함을 확인하였다.

영문초록

The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility and the usefulness of Cognitive Diagnostic Models (CDMs) when it is applied to psychological tests. This study uses the Multi-group G-DINA with gender and school achievement as group classifying variables to analyze the emotion and behavior problem test results. This is because, the Goodness of Model fit indicated that Multi-group G-DINA is more applicable than G-DINA. Using data from the 2012 Korean Children and Youth Panel Study (KCYPS), this study shows that girls have more internalized behavioral problems than externalized behavioral problems, and boys have opposite characteristics. The emotion and behavior problems become severe as the school achievement get lower, but the highest school achievement group have strong academic anxiety. Multi-group CDMs can estimate parameters by controlling the group effect and applicable when one item measures two or more factors. Furthermore, using the Multi-group CDMs, researchers can compare the group characteristics meaningfully because it offers individual and group level results simultaneously. These features of Multi-group CDMs assure that it is practical for applying to psychological tests.

키워드

다집단 인지진단모형 다집단 G-DINA모형 청소년 정서·행동문제 Multi-group Cognitive Diagnostic Models Multi-group G-DINA emotion and behavior problems

참고문헌 (36건)

김성은(2015). 다집단 인지진단모형의 적용과 Q행렬 타당화 방법 간의 회복률 비교: 정서・행동문제 검사에의 적용. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문. (Translated in English) Kim, S. E.(2015). The application of multi-group cognitive diagnostic models and The comparative study on the recovery rate between validation method of Q matrix: the application if emotional and behavioral problem inspection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewah Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
김성은, 박윤수, 이영선(2012). 인지진단모형을 적용한 잠재집단별 분수뺄셈검사 문제해결 전략의 차이 분석. 교육평가연구, 25(1), 49-68. (Translated in English) Kim, S. E., Park, Y. S., & Lee, Y-S.(2012). Application of Latent Class Model to Multiple Strategy CDM Analysis. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 25(1). 49-68.
김창대, 오인수, 유현실, 이동혁, 이상민, 이영선, 이정윤(2012). 다면적 성장잠재력 검사 개발연구. 서울시교육청 (Translated in English) Kim, C. D., Oh, I. S., Yu, H. S., Lee, D. H., Lee, S. M., Lee, Y-S.. & Lee, J. Y.(2012). Development of Multiphasic Developmental Potential Inventory(MDPI). Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education.
배도희 오경자(2010). 한국판 CBCL 공격행동척도의 하위 2요인 모형탐색. 한국심리학회지:학교, 7, 371-390. (Translated in English) Oh, K. J., & Bae, D. H.(2010). A study on two subtypes of Aggression based on the K-CBCL aggressive behavior subscale. The Korean J ournal of School Psychology, 7(3), 371-390.
조봉환, 임경희(2003). 아동의 정서, 행동문제 자기보고형 평정척도 개발 및 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지 상담 및 심리치료, 15(4), 729-746. (Translated in English) Cho, B. H., & Lim, K. H.(2003). Development and Validation of Emotional or Behavioral Problems Scale. The Korean J ournal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 15(4), 729-746.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
Barkley, R. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructiong a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 65-94.
Barry, T. D., Lyman, R. D., & Klinger, L. G. (2002). Academic underachievement and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder：The negative impact of symptom severity on school performance. J ournal of School Psychology, 40(3), 259-283.
Bullock, L., Gable, R., & Melloy, K. (2005). Effective disciplinary practices: strategies for maintaining safe schools and positive learning environments for students with challenging behaviors. Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED495394).
Chiu, C. Y. (2013). Statistical Refinement of the Q-matrix in Cognitive Diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(8), 598–618.
Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Kasen, S., Velez, C. N., Hartmark, C., Johnson, J., Rojas, M., Brook, J. et al. (1993). An epidemiological study of disorders in late childhood and adolescence: Ⅰ. Age and gender-specific prevalence. J ournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 851-867.
Coleman, M. C., & Webber, J. (2002) Emotional and behavioral disorders: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
de la Torre, J.(2008). An empirically-based method of Q-Matrix validation for the DINA model: Development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 343-363.
de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76, 179-199.
de la Torre, J., van der Ark, L. A., & Rossi, G. (2015). Analysis of Clinical Data From Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling Framework. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, (DOI: 10.1177/0748175615569110), 1-16.
Gierl, M. J., & Cui, Y. (2008). Defining Characteristics of Diagnostic Classification Models and the Problem of Retrofitting in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. Measurement, 6, 263-275.
Henson, R., & Douglas, J. (2005). Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 262-277.
Jaeger, J., Tatsuoka, C., & Berns, S. (2003). Innovative methods for extracting valid cognitive deficit profiles from NP test data in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 60, 140-140.
Johnson, M., Lee, Y.-S., Sachdeva, R., Zhang, Z., & Park, J. Y. (2013, April). Examination of Gender Differences Using the Multiple Groups DINA Model . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA.
Kauffman, J. M. (2005). Characteristic of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (8th ed.). Uooer Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Kauffman, J. M., & Landrum, T. J. (2009). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593-602.
Lane, K. L. (2004) Academic instruction and tutoring intervention fro students with emotional and behavioral disorders: 1990 to the present. In R. B. Rutherford, M. M. Quinn & S. R. Mathur (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 15-31 and 462-486.). NY: Guilford Press.
Lee, Y.-S., Johnson, M., Park, J. Y., Sachdeva, R., & Zhang, Z. (2012, July). An Application of a Multiple-Group CDM to Compare Cognitive Attribute Distributions based on Eighth Grade TIMSS Mathematics. Poster presented at the 8th conference of the International Test Commission at Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Macready, G. B, & Dayton, C. M. (1977). The use of probabilistic models in the assessment of mastery. Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 99-120.
Maris, E. (1995). Psychometric latent response models. Psychometrika, 60, 523-547.
Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64, 187-212.
McConaughy, S., & Skiba, R. (1994). Comorbidity of externalizing and internalizing problems. School Psychology Review, 22(3), 421-36.
Millon, T., Millon, C., Davis, R., & Grossman, S. (2006). MCMI-III Manual (3rd Ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
Rapport, M. D., Denney, C. B., Chung, K., & Hustace, K. (2001). Internalizing behavior problems and scholastic achievement in children：Cognitive and behavioral pathways as mediators of outcome. J ournal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30(4), 536-551.
Rupp, A. A. (2007). The answer is in the question: A guide for describing and investigating the conceptual foundations and statistical properties of cognitive psychometric models. International J ournal of Testing, 7, 95-125.
Rupp, A. A., & Templin, J. L. (2008). Unique Characteristics of Diagnostic Classification Models: A Comprehensive Review of the Current State-of-the-Art. Measurement, 6, 219-262.
Rupp, A. A., Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2010). Diagnostic Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. The Guilford Press.
Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2006). Measurement of Psychological Disorders Using Cognitive Diagnosis Models. Psychological Methods, 11, 287-305.
Van Oort, F. V. A., Greaves-Lord, K., Verhulst, F. C., Ormel, J., & Huizink, A. C. (2009). The developmental course of anxiety symptoms during adolescence: the TRAILS study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(10), 1209-1217.
Zahn-Waxler, C., Klimes, D. B., & Slattery, M. (2000). Internalizing problems of childhood and adolescence: Prospects, pitfalls, and progress in understanding the development of anxiety and depression. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 443-66.

구매하기 (5,000)

장바구니

국문초록

영문초록

목차

키워드

참고문헌 (36건)