기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
임파워링 리더십과 혁신 행위 간에 미치는 자기효능감의 매개효과
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 임파워링 리더십과 혁신 행위 간에 미치는 자기효능감의 매개효과
  • A Mediation Effect of Self-Efficacy between Empowering Leadership and Innovative Behavior
저자명
권정언, 권상집
간행물명
기업교육과 인재연구KCI
권/호정보
2015년|17권 1호(통권31호)|pp.83-103 (21 pages)
발행정보
한국기업교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.58MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

환경의 불확실성이 커지면서 조직 구성원들의 혁신 행위에 대한 기업의 관심은 점점 더 높아지고 있다. 이에 따라 본 연구는 최근 유연한 조직과 수평적 의사결정 방식이 강조되면 서 주목받고 있는 임파워링 리더십이 조직 구성원들의 혁신 행위를 유발하는데 어떤 메커니 즘을 수반하고 있는지 분석하였다. 연구 대상은 국내 패션 관련 산업에 있는 중견기업이며, 설문에는 총 243명이 참가하였다. 분석 결과, 임파워링 리더십은 조직 구성원의 자기효능감 에 긍정적인 영향을 주었으며, 자기효능감은 임파워링 리더십이 구성원들의 혁신 행위를 촉 진하는데 긍정적인 매개 효과를 주는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과는 그동안 임파워링 리더십 연구가 개인의 창의성 및 팀 성과에 미치는 영향에 집중되었다는 점을 감안해 볼 때, 임파워링 리더십이 개인의 혁신 행위와 자기효능감에 미치는 긍정적 결과를 입증함으로써 기존 리더십 및 심리적 변인 관련 연구 영역을 확대하는데 기여하였다. 아울러, 급변하는 환 경에 구성원들의 혁신 행위를 유도하기 위해 리더는 권한 위임과 자율성을 부여하는 임파워 링 리더십을 슬기롭게 발휘하여 구성원들의 자기효능감을 유발해야 한다는 점을 실증적으로 보여줌으로써 기업교육과 관련된 실천적 지혜도 함께 제시하였다.

영문초록

This study aims to identify the relationships among the empowering leadership, individual self efficacy, and innovative behavior. Our study data were collected from 243 employees in a general merchandise fashion-brand company. Our empirical results suggest that (1) empowering leadership is positively associated with innovative behavior. (2) In addition, empowering leadership is positively related to self efficacy. (3) Finally, self efficacy tends to strengthen the relationship between empowering leadership and innovative behavior. The results provide that organizations emphasize to boost employee innovative behavior and self-efficacy through leaders' empowering leadership. Our study suggests that organizations must train leaders to develop skills of autonomy, participative decision making, and empowerment coaching. We discuss implications for educational fields and provide future research directions.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구모형 및 가설
Ⅳ. 연구방법
Ⅴ. 연구결과
Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (61건)

  • 권상집 (2015). 리더십 유형과 조직 구성원 애착 유형의 상호작용이 창의성에 미치는 차별화 효과: 임파워링 리더십과 서번트 리더십. 한국과학기술원 박사학위 논문. (Translated in English) Kwon. S. (2015). The differential interaction effects of leadership style and followers’ attachment style on creativity: Empowering leadership versus servant leadership. KAIST Ph. D Dissertation.
  • 권정언 (2011). 엔터테인먼트 미디어 기업에서 개인의 창의적 성향이 조직의 창의적 성과에 미치는 영향. 중앙대학교 박사학위 논문. (Translated in English) Kwon. J. (2011). The influence of individual creativity to organizational creative product in entertainment media companies: Focus on unlearning capacity and absorptive capacity. Chung-ang University Ph. D Dissertation.
  • 권정언, 권상집 (2014). 안정그룹 애착이 개인 창의성에 미치는 영향: 자아 효능감의 매개효과. 지식경영연구, 15(2), 43-66. (Translated in English) Kwon. J., & Kwon. S. (2014). A study on the effect of group attachment security on individual creativity: Mediation effect of self-efficacy. Knowledge Management Research, 15(2), 43-66.
  • 권정언, 우형록 (2015). 팀의 양면적 활동이 창의적 성과에 미치는 영향: 탐색, 활용의 균형과 조합을 중심으로. 경영학연구, 44(2), 431-458. (Translated in English) Kwon. J., & Woo. H. (2015). The effect of ambidextrous activity through combination and balance on creative performance. Korean Management Review, 44(2), 431-458..
  • 김승용, 이병철, 김기흥 (2013). 임파워링 리더십이 구성원의 지식공유와 내재적 동기부여에 미치는 영향: 상사신뢰 매개를 중심으로. 지식경영연구, 14(2), 89-115. (Translated in English) Kim. S., Lee. B., & Kim. G. (2013). Research on the influence of empowering leadership on followers’ knowledge sharing and intrinsic motivation: Through trust on supervisors. Knowledge Management Research, 14(2), 89-115.
  • 김창호, 이건창, 정남호 (2005). 팀 조직의 활동이 지식경영 활동 및 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증적인 분석. 지식경영연구, 6(2), 1-18. (Translated in English) Kim. C., Lee. G., & Jung. N. (2005). An empirical analysis of the influence of team activity on the knowledge management performance. Knowledge Management Research, 6(2), 1-18.
  • 김현진, 설현도 (2014). 개인창의성과 집단창의성의 관계에서 통합능력과 지식공유의 매개효과. 지식경영연구, 15(4), 223-247. (Translated in English) Kim. H., & Shul. H. (2014). Mediating effects of integrative capability and knowledge sharing on the relationship between individual creativity and group creativity. Knowledge Management Research, 15(4), 223-247.
  • 김희동, 김정원, 조윤정 (2014). 국내 기업종사자 직무특성과 직무몰입 및 자기효능감간의 관계. 기업교육연구, 16(1), 101-127. (Translated in English) Kim. H., Kim. J., & Cho. Y. (2014). A study on the relationship of job characteristics, job involvement, and self-efficacy of employees in domestic corporations. Journal of Corporate Education, 16(1), 101-127.
  • 박재진, 최은수 (2013). 기업체 중간관리자의 코칭리더십, 학습조직, 구성원의 문제해결능력 및 조직유효성 변인 간의 구조적 관계. 기업교육연구, 15(2), 1-28. (Translated in English) Park. J., & Choi. E. (2013). Structural relationships between the variables of the middle managers' coaching leadership, learning organization, employees' problem solving ability and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Corporate Education, 15(2), 1-28.
  • 홍성화, 최은수 (2011). 중소기업 최고경영자의 오센틱 리더십이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향. 기업교육연구, 13(2), 1-29. (Translated in English) Hong. S., & Choi. E. (2011). An analysis of the influence of authentic leadership of the CEO of small and medium business on the Organizational Effectiveness. Journal of Corporate Education, 13(2), 1-29.
  • Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 945-955.
  • Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, L. (2014). Self-other agreement in empowering leadership: Relationships with leader effectiveness and subordinates' job satisfaction and turnover intention. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 784-800.
  • Anderson, N., DeDreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state of the science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147-173.
  • Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249-269.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  • Burpitt, W. J., & Bigoness, W. J. (1997). Leadership and innovation among teams: The impact of empowerment. Small Group Research, 28, 414-423.
  • Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 720-735.
  • Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., & Rosen, B. (2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 331-346.
  • Chen, G., Sharma, P. N., Edinger, S. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Farh, J. L. (2011). Motivating and demotivating force in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 541-557.
  • Claxton, G. L. (1998). Knowing without knowing why: Investigating human intuition. The Psychologist, 11, 217-220.
  • Cohen, S. G., Chang, L., & Ledford, G. E., Jr. (1997). A hierarchial construct of self-management leadership and its relationship to quality of work life and perceived work group effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 50, 275-308.
  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Journal, 13, 471-482.
  • Dennis, R. S., & Bocarnea, M. (2005). Development of a servant leadership assessment instrument. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26, 600-615.
  • Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105-123.
  • Ford, R. C., & Fottler, M. D. (1995). Empowerment: A matter of degree. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 21-29.
  • Foss, N. J., Minbaeva, D. B., Pedersen, T., & Reinholt, M. (2009). Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: How job design matters. Human Resource Management, 48, 871-893.
  • Gibson, C. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138-152.
  • Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 765-778.
  • Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73-96.
  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1998). The power of servant leadership. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Gully, S, M., Incalcaterra, K. A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J, M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.
  • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Life cycle theory of leadership. Training & Development Journal, 23, 26-34.
  • Holye, R. H., & Smith, G. T. (1994). Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 429-440.
  • Houghton, J. D., & Yoho, S. K. (2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: When should self-leadership be encouraged?. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11, 65-83.
  • Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128-1145.
  • Jong, A. D., Song, M., & Song, L. Z. (2013). How lead founder personality affects new venture performance: The mediating role of team conflict. Journal of Management, 39, 1825-1854.
  • Kinlaw, D. C. (1995). The practice of empowerment. Hampshire, England: Gower.
  • Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58-74.
  • Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J., & Trust, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 301-313.
  • Latham, G. P., Winters, D. C., & Locke, E. A. (1994). Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 49-63.
  • Laub, J. A. (1999). Assessing the servant organization: Development of the organizational leadership assessment (OLA) model. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University).
  • Locke, A. E., Alavi, M., & Wagner, J. (1997). Participation in decision making: An information exchange perspective. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management, Vol. 15: 293-331, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Lorinkova, N. M., Pearsall, M. J., & Sims, H. P. (2013). Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 573-596.
  • Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106-129.
  • McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Anderson, R. D. (2002). Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 545-559.
  • Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B. H., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705-750.
  • Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 438-454.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods & Computers, 36, 717-731.
  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Casual and control beliefs (pp. 35-37), Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
  • Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?. Journal of Management, 30, 933-958.
  • Shin, J. S., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 703-714.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models, In. S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology: 290-312, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Spreitzer, G. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
  • Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., Locke, E. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1239-1251.
  • Swift, C., & Levin, G. (1987). Empowerment: An emerging mental health technology. Journal of Primary Prevention, 8, 71-94.
  • Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30, 413-432.
  • Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 540-555.
  • Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107-128.
  • Zhang, X., & Zhou, J. (2014). Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 150-164.
구매하기 (5,000)
추천 연관논문