기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
장바구니
 고객센터
본문검색
  • 검색 히스토리
실시간 인기검색어
서지반출
A General Educator’s Instructional Differentiations for Students with Mathematics Disabilities in Standards-Based Mathematics Classroom in the U.S.
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • A General Educator’s Instructional Differentiations for Students with Mathematics Disabilities in Standards-Based Mathematics Classroom in the U.S.
  • 수학 학습 장애 아동을 위한 일반 학급 교사의 수준별 수업
ㆍ 저자명
Sun A Kim
ㆍ 간행물명
학습장애연구KCI
ㆍ 권/호정보
2014년|11권 1호(통권24호)|pp.205-241 (37 pages)
ㆍ 발행정보
한국학습장애학회|한국
ㆍ 파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트(0.4MB)
ㆍ 주제분야
특수교육학
서지반출

영문초록

This study employed an embedded, single-case study methodology to examine how a general education teacher differentiates mathematics instruction for her students with mathematics disabilities in standardsbased mathematics classroom. The findings of this study indicated that the general education teacher endeavored to differentiate mathematics instruction for her students with mathematics disabilities using diverse components of effective mathematics instruction, but her differentiation was limited in terms of the number of students targeted for differentiated instruction. Findings and their implications for research are discussed.

영문초록

본 연구는 내재된 단일 사례 연구법을 사용하여, 수학 교수와 학습을 위해 표준-기반 접근 법의 영향하에 있는 4학년 일반 학급에서 세 명의 수학 학습 장애 아동이 어떠한 수준별 수 업을 받고 있는지를 알아보고자 했다. 연구 결과에 따르면, 연구 참여 수학 교사는 효과적인 다양한 교수법을 사용하여 수학 장애아동을 위해 수준별 수업을 수행하였으나, 수준별 수업 은 특정 몇몇의 학생을 위해서만 이루어졌다. 기존 연구를 바탕으로 본 연구의 결과와 함의 가 논의 되었다.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Method
Ⅲ. Results
Ⅳ. Discussion
References

키워드

instructional differentiationmath disabilitiesstandards based mathematics instruction수준별 수업수학 학습 장애표준 기반 수학 교수법

참고문헌 (36건)

  • 김동일, 홍성두 (2008). 학습장애 판단에 있어서 교사의 임상적 판단의 특성 분석. 학습장애연구, 5(2), 43-59.
  • 정해진 (2008). 학습 장애 아동을 위한 구성 주의적 교수-학습 방법의 적용의 실제. 학습장애연구, 5(1), 77-96.
  • Aud, S., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Kristapovich, P., Rathbun, A., Wang, X., & Zhang, J. (2013). The condition of education 2013 (NCES 2013-037). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
  • Baxter, J., Woodward, J., Voorhies, J., & Wong, J. (2002). We talk about it, but do they get it? Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 17, 173-185.
  • Bender, W. N. (2012). Differentiating Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities: New Best Practices for General and Special Educators(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
  • Bottge, B. A. (2001). Reconceptualizing mathematics problem solving for low-achieving students. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 102-112.
  • Bryant, D. P., Kim, S., Hartman, P., & Bryant, B. (2006). Standards-based mathematics instruction and teaching middle school students with mathematics disabilities. In M. Montague & A. Jitendra (Eds.), Middle school students with mathematics difficulties. NewYork: Guilford.
  • Cass, M. Cates, D., Smith, M., & Jackson, C. (2003). Effects of manipulative instruction on solving area and perimeter problems by students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 112-120.
  • Cawley, J., Parmar, R., Foley, T. E., Salmon, S., & Roy, S. (2001). Arithmetic performances of students: Implications for standards and programming. Exceptional Children, 67, 311-328.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches(4thed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, Inc.
  • Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM). (2010). Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
  • Durkin, D. (1990). Matching classroom instruction with reading abilities: An unmet need. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 23-28.
  • Foote, M., & Kim, S.(In press). Special issue of overcoming learning difficulties: Introduction to language issues in the learning and teaching of mathematics. Reading & Writing Quarterly.
  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Bishop, N. (1992). Instructional adaptation for students at risk for academic failure. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 70-84.
  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. Phillips, N., & Karns, K. (1995). General educators’ specialized adaptation for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61, 440-459.
  • Garner, R. (1992). Learning from school texts. Educational Psychologist, 27, 53-63.
  • Gersten, R., Chard, D., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202-1242.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. 108-446 (2004).
  • Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C., Deatline-Buchman, A., Dipipi-Hoy, C., Sczesniak, E., Sokol, N. G., & Xin, Y. P. (2005). Adherence to mathematics professional standards and instructional design criteria for problem-solving in mathematics. Exceptional Children, 71, 319-337.
  • Kagan, D. M., & Tippins, D. J. (1991). Help student teachers attend to student cues. Elementary School Journal, 91, 343-356.
  • Maccini, P., & Gagnon, J. C. (2000). Best practices for teaching mathematics to secondary students with special needs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32, 1-22.
  • Maccini, P., & Gagnon, J. C. (2006). Mathematics instructional practices and assessment accommodations by secondary special and general educators. Exceptional Children, 72, 217-234.
  • McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Hagger, D., & Abby, O. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60, 249-261.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Moschkovich, J. (2012). Mathematics, the Common Core, and language: Recommendations for mathematics education for ELs aligned with the common core. Unpublished manuscript, Understanding Language, Stanford University. CA.
  • National Center for Education Statistics (2013). The Nation’s Report Card: A First Look: 2013 Mathematics and Reading (NCES 2014-451). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107-110, 2102(4) (2002).
  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Abby, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 249-274.
  • Tomlinson, C. A., et al. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27, 119-145.
  • Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D. J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99-114.
  • Vaughn, S. Moody, S. W., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Broken promise: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 64, 211-225.
  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ysseldyke, J. Kosciolek, S., Spicuzza, R., & Boys, C. (2003). Effects of a learning information system on mathematics achievement and classroom structure. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 163-173.
구매하기 (6,600)
장바구니
추천 연관논문