기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
장바구니
 고객센터
본문검색
  • 검색 히스토리
실시간 인기검색어
서지반출
통찰에 대한 실험연구는 통찰의 발생 과정을 반영하는가?: 통찰 실험연구에 있어 실험문제와 실험절차에 대한 제언
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 통찰에 대한 실험연구는 통찰의 발생 과정을 반영하는가?: 통찰 실험연구에 있어 실험문제와 실험절차에 대한 제언
  • Does Experimental Insight Research Reflect Insight Process? A Proposal for Selecting Adequate Problems in Insight Experiment and Ecologically Valid Procedure of Insight Research
ㆍ 저자명
이경민,임 웅
ㆍ 간행물명
창의력교육연구KCI
ㆍ 권/호정보
2014년|14권 2호(통권23호)|pp.41-54 (14 pages)
ㆍ 발행정보
한국창의력교육학회|한국
ㆍ 파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.3MB)
ㆍ 주제분야
교육학
서지반출

국문초록

통찰은 창의적인 산물이 만들어지는 과정에 결정적인 역할을 한다고 알려져 왔다. 하지만 통찰을 만드는 재료가 무엇인지에 대해서는 아직 완전한 합의가 이루어지지 못한 실정이다. 본 논문은 통찰의 과정을 밝히려는 실험연구에서 지속적으로 보고되는 상반된 연구결과의 원 인을 분석하여, 이를 바탕으로 실험에 사용되는 실험문제와 실험절차에 대한 문제점을 지적한 다. 또한 이러한 문제점을 해결하고 보다 타당한 연구결과를 도출할 수 있는 방법론적 설계에 대해 논의하고 있다. 본 논문에서 제안하는 방법론적 대안은 통찰의 발현기제와 관련 변인의 역할을 이해하는데 도움을 줄 수 있을 것이다.

영문초록

It has been proposed that an insight is crucial to make creative product. However, there is no consensus yet what makes it and its process is. Moreover experimental research focused in this topic has reported controversial results. This study examined what makes this controversial results. The authors argued that these controversial ones were caused by using pure-insight problems and by one-step experimental procedure. This study proposed that it would be considered using hybrid-insight problems involved both perceptual functions and domain-related knowledge or strategy. In addition, two-step procedures would be better to confirm the difference between experimental and control group. These two proposals on this study may let the controversial results reconcile with.

목차

Ⅰ. 창의적 문제해결의 핵심 과정으로서의 통찰
Ⅱ. 통찰실험의 설계
Ⅲ. 통찰실험문제의 종류와 한계점
Ⅳ. 생태학적으로 타당한 통찰연구에 대한 제안
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

키워드

창의통찰재구조화지각전략저지식문제고지식문제creativityinsightrestructuringperceptionstrategyknowledge-lean problemknowledge-rich problem

참고문헌 (45건)

  • 민경미, 임 웅 (2012). 신형태주의 관점에 기초한 통찰 연구 실험에 있어 지각과 전략의 혼재 가능성에 대한 검증. 영재와 영재교육, 11(3), 67-87.
  • 임 웅 (2009). 통찰! 지각인가 혹은 지식인가?: 인지의 하향처리과정으로서의 통찰. 영재와 영재교육, 8(3), 89-108.
  • 임 웅 (2012). 통찰의 발현 기제에 대한 신형태주의 관점의 타당성 고찰. 창의력교육연구, 12(3), 57-74.
  • Ash, I. K., & Wiley, J. (2002). Ah-ha, I knew it all along: Differences in hindsight bias between insight and algebra problems. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
  • Ash, I. K., & Wiley, J. (2006). The nature of restructuring in insight: An individual- differences approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), 66-73.
  • Ash, I. K., & Wiley, J. (2008). Hindsight bias in insight and mathematical problem solving: Evidence of different reconstruction mechanisms for metacognitive versus situational judgments. Memory & Cognition, 36(4), 822-837.
  • Bowden, E. M., & Beeman, M. J. (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems. Psychological Science, 9, 435-440.
  • Burnham, C. A., & Davis, K. G. (1969). The nine-dot problem: Beyond perceptual organization. Psychonomic Science, 17, 321-323.
  • Chein, J. M., Weisberg, R. W., Streeter, N. L., & Kwok, S. (2010). Working memory and insight in the nine-dot problem. Memory & Cognition, 38(7), 883-892.
  • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive science, 5(2), 121-152.
  • Chronicle, E. P., MacGregor, J. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2004). What makes an insight problem? The roles of heuristics, goal conception, and solution recoding in knowledge-lean problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 14.
  • Chronicle, E. P., Ormerod, T. C., & MacGregor, J. N. (2001). When insight just won't come: The failure of visual cues in the nine-dot problem. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(3), 903-919.
  • Cunningham, J. B., MacGregor, J. N., Gibb, J., & Haar, J. (2009). Categories of insight and their correlates: An exploation of relationships among classic-type insight problems, rebus puzzles, remote associates and esoteric analogies. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 262- 280.
  • Dominowski, R. L. (1981). Comment on “An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution several “insight” problems” by Weisberg and Alba. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(2), 193-198.
  • Dreistadt, R. (1969). The use of analogies and incubation in obtaining insights in creative problem solving. The journal of psychology, 71(2), 159-175.
  • Duncker, K. (1945). ‘On problem-solving,’ trans. L. S. Lees, Psychological Monographs, 58, 5.
  • Durso, F. T., Rea, C. B., & Dayton, T. (1994). Graph-theoretic confirmation of restructuring during insight. Psychological Science, 5(2), 94- 58.
  • Ellen, P. (1982). Direction, past experience, and hints in creative problem solving: reply to Weisberg and Alba. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(3), 316-325.
  • Gick, M. L., & Lockhart, R. S. (1995). Cognitive and affective components of insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of insight (pp.197-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Humphrey, G. (1963). Thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology. New York: Wiley.
  • Kaplan, C. A., & Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 374-419.
  • Kaufman. J. C., & Baer. J. (2004). Hawking's haiku, Madonna's math: Why it is hard to be creative in every room of the house. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp.3-19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Kershaw, T. C., & Ohlsson, S. (2001). Training for insight: The case of the nine-dot problem. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 489-493). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
  • Kershaw, T. C., & Ohlsson, S. (2004). Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition. 30(1), 3-13.
  • Lavric, A., Forstmeier, S., & Rippon, G. (2000). Differences in working memory involvement in analytical and creative tasks. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 11, 1613-1618.
  • Lung, C. T., & Dominowski, R. L. (1985). Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 804-811.
  • MacGregor, J. N., Ormerod, T. C., & Chronicle, E. P. (2001). Information processing and insight: A process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition, 27, 176-201.
  • Maier, N. R. F. (1930). Reasoning in humansⅠ. On direction. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 10(2), 115-143.
  • Metcalfe, J. (1986). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(2), 288.
  • Metcalfe, J. (1987). Premonitions of insight predict impending error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 623-634.
  • Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 238-246.
  • Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In M. T. Keane & K. J. Gilhooly (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of thinking (Vol. 1, pp.1-44). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Ormerod, T. C., Chronicle, E. P., & MacGregor, J. N. (1997). Facilitation in variants of the nine-dot problem: perceptual or cognitive mediation?. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 19, 1005.
  • Parkhurst, H. B. (1999). Confusion, lack of consensus, and the definition of creativity as a construct. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 1-21.
  • Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp.153-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Scheerer, M. (1963). Problem-solving. Scientific American, 208(4), 118-128.
  • Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1982). The mind of the puzzler. Psychology Today, 16(6), 37-44.
  • VanLehn, K. (1989). Problem solving and cognitive skill acquisition. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp.527-580). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Weisberg, R. W. (1995). Prolegomena to theories of insight in problem solving: Definition of terms and a taxonomy of problems. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Ed.), The nature of insight (pp.157-196). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Weisberg, R. W., & Alba, J. W. (1981a). An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution several “insight” problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(2), 169-192.
  • Weisberg, R. W., & Alba, J. W. (1981b). Gestalt Theory, insight, and past experience: Reply to Dominowski. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(2), 199-203.
  • Weisberg, R. W., & Alba, J. W. (1982). Problem solving is not like perception: more on gestalt theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(3), 326-330.
  • Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking(Enlarged ed.). New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
구매하기 (4,300)
장바구니
추천 연관논문