교사의 전문성 개발 참여에 미친 학교 수준 변인의 영향

송인발; 박주호

서지반출

국문초록

본 연구에서는 참여적 학교풍토와 학교의 물리적 여건 및 특징 요인(교사평가 빈도, 의도 적인 학습 지원으로서 시간적·금전적 지원, 학교규모, 학교의 SES로서 저소득층 출신 학생 비 율)이 교사의 전문성 개발 활동에 미치는 효과를 확인하였다. 특히, 본 연구는 전문성 개발 활동을 ‘외부전문기관에 의한 교사연수활동’와 ‘학교 내 교사협력활동’으로 구분하고, 각 활동 유형에 대한 학교조직 수준 변인의 효과를 HLM(Hierarchical Linear Modeling)으로 분석하였 다. 연구대상은 OECD TALIS 2013에 참여한 우리나라 177개 중학교 교장과 교사 2,933명이 다. 본 연구 결과, ‘교사연수활동’에는 금전적 지원이, ‘교사협력활동’에는 참여적 학교풍토와 시간적 지원이 통계적으로 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 한편, 교사평가 빈도와 학교 SES는 교사연수활동과 교사협력활동에 모두 유의미한 영향을 주지 못하는 것으로 나타 났다. 결론적으로, 본 연구 결과는 교사의 전문성 개발 활동을 촉진시키기 위하여 학교조직 수준에서 참여적 학교풍토를 조성하고 교사협력활동을 위한 적절한 시간을 교사들에게 할애 하는 노력 및 정책적 개입이 필요함을 시사한다.

영문초록

The purpose of this study is to identify the impact of participative school climate and other school features (the frequency of exerting teacher appraisals, time and money as intentional learning supports, school size, and school socioeconomic status) on teacher's participation in professional development activities. In particular, the present study categorizes professional development into its traditional formal activities and informal activities focusing on teacher’s collaborative activities as a new paradigm. Then, the impact of the independent variables at the school level on each type of teacher professional development was investigated by HLM (Hierarchical Linear Modeling). The sample of this study was 177 Korean middle school principals and 2,933 teachers who participated in the OECD TALIS 2013. The results of the study revealed that a financial support is only significantly associated with the formal activities of teacher professional development, while participative school climate and allocation of scheduled time significantly effect the form of informal activities, teacher collaborative activities. On the other hand, the frequency of exerting teacher appraisals and school SES did not have a significant impact on both formal and informal activities. As a result, this study suggests that it is important to make an effort and policy intervention to create a participative school climate in the context of a school and to supply a reasonable amount of time for teachers to facilitate their professional development.

키워드

교사의 전문성 개발 교사협력활동 참여적 학교풍토 Teacher professional development Formal activities of professional development Teacher collaboration Participative school climate

참고문헌 (71건)

강상진(1995). 다층통계모형의 방법론적 특성과 활용방법. 교육평가연구, 8, 63-94.
강상진, 정혜경(2002). 다층모형에서 예측변수 척도의 중심점 교정과 모수추정치의 변화. 교육평가연구, 15(2), 21-42.
고재천(2012). 초등학교 교사가 인식한 전문성 개발 활동 참여 동기에 대한 개념도 연구. 한국교원교육연구, 29(4), 129-152.
김아영(2012). 교사 전문성 핵심요인으로서의 교사 효능감. 교육심리연구, 26(1), 63-84.
김옥예(2006). 교사 전문성의 재개념화에 관한 연구. 교육행정학연구 24(4), 139-160.
김혜숙(2003). 교사 ‘전문성’과 ‘질’의 개념 및 개선전략 탐색. 교육학연구, 41(2), 93-114.
박균열(2008). 교사의 수업전문성 영향요인에 관한 구조적 분석. 교육행정학연구 26(2), 49-74.
서경혜(2009). 교사 전문성 개발을 위한 대안적 접근으로서 교사학습공동체의 가능성과 한계. 한국교원교육연구, 26(2), 243-276.
소경희(2003). “교사전문성”의 재개념화 방향 탐색을 위한 기초연구. 교육과정연구, 21(4), 77-96.
송경오(2007). 교사의 학습기회증진에 효과적인 정책수단(Policy instrument)에 관한 연구. 교육행정학연구, 25(2), 121-144.
유낙주(1993). 학교조직풍토에 관한 이론적 고찰. 사회과학연구, 3, 191-143.
이지혜, 이인회(2010). 교사의 업무부담, 직무만족, 조직몰입, 교사전문성과 학교교육 성과의 구조적관계 분석. 한국교원교육연구, 27(2), 25-52.
이화자(2008). 교사 전문성 개발의 실천적 사례 비교연구. Studies of English Education, 13(1), 1-35.
이희숙, 정제영(2011). 교사 특성이 학생의 학업성취에 미치는 영향 분석 - TIMSS 2007의 교사 전문성 개발 노력 변인을 중심으로. 한국교원교육연구, 28(1), 243-266.
정제영, 김현주, 이유진(2014). 교사의 전문성 계발 수준에 영향을 미치는 지역의 교육환경 요인 분석. 한국교원교육연구, 31(3), 321-342.
함형인, 김기열, 이정훈, 김기수(2014). 기술교사 학습공동체의 참여 동기와 교수전문성 개발에 관한 연구. 한국기술교육학회지, 14(1), 111-134.
허은정(2011). 학습조직으로서의 학교가 교사 전문성에 미치는 효과. 한국교원교육연구, 28(3), 29-53.
Antoniou, P. & Kyriakides, L.(2013). A Dynamic Integrated Approach to teacher professional development: Impact and sustainability of the effects on improving teacher behaviour and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 1-12.
Azumi, J. E., & Madhere, S.(1983). Profession-alism, power and performance: The relation ships between administrative control, teacher conformity, and student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal
Beredeson, P. V., & Johansson, O.(2000). The School Principal’s role in teacher professional development. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(2). 385-401.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T.(1995). “Expanding a teacher’s knowledge base: a cognitive psychological perspective on professional development”. In: T. R. Guskey, & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: new paradigms and practices. New York: Teachers College Press.
Bridges, E. M., & Hallinan, M. T.(1978). Subunit size, work system interdependence, and employee absenteeism. Educational Administration Quarterly, 14, 24-42.
Brown, M. (1969). Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 346-355.
Clardy, A.(2000). Learning on their own: Vocationally oriented self-directed learning projects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11, 105–.125.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.(2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 45-56). New York: Teachers College Press.
Cohen, D. K.(1990). A revolution in one classroom : The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Education and Policy Analyisis, 12(3), 311-329.
Cohen, D., & Hill, H. (1997). Policy, practice, and learning. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, March 1997. Chicago, IL.
DuFour, R. P.(1997). The school as a learning organization: recommendations for school improvement. NASSP Bulletin, 81, 81-87.
Duke, D. L.(1990). Setting goals for professional development. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 71-75.
Fullan, M.(1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (2002). Teacher development and educational change. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, P. F., & Yoon, K. S.(2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
Gersten, R., Carnine, D., Zoref, L., & Cronin, D.(1986). A multifaceted study of change in seven inner-city schools. Elementary School Journal, 86, 258-275.
Guglielmi, R. S., & Tatrow, K. (1998). Occupational stress, burnout, and health in teachers: A methodological and theoretical analysis. Review of Educational Research, 68, 61–99.
Hanushek, E. A.(2005). Economic outcome and school quality: educational policy service. Paris, France: International Institute for Educational planning and International Academy of Education.
Hargreaves, A.(1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers work and cultures in the post modern age. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D.(2000). The three dimensions of reform. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 30–34. Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. 2000. An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jurasaite-Harbison, E. & Rex, L. A.(2010). School cultures as contexts for informal teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 267–277.
Kreft, Ita G. G. & Leeuw, Jan de.(1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London and Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
Kwakman, K.(2001). Work stress and work-based learning in secondary education: Testing the karasek model. Human Resource Development International, 4, 487–.501.
Kwakman, K.(2003). Factors affecting teachers’participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149–170.
Lashway, L.(1998). Creating a learning organization (ERIC Digest). Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420897)
Lieberman, A.(1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 591–596.
Lieberman, A., & Miller, L.(1990). Teacher development in professional practice schools. Teachers College Record, 92(1), 105–122.
Lieberman, A. & McLaughlin, M. W.(1992). Networks for Educational Change: Powerful and Problematic. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(9), 673-677.
Little, J. W.(1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91, 509–536.
Little, J. W.(1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–51.
Lortie, D. C.(2002). Schoolteacher:Asociologicalstudy (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E.(1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
McLaughlin, M. W.(1997). Rebuilding teacher professionalism in the United States. In A. Hargreaves, & R. Evans (Eds.), Beyond educational reform. Bringing teachers back in (pp.77 –93). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Melville, W., & Wallace, J.(2007). Metaphorical duality: High school subject departments as both communities and organizations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1193-1205.
Odden, A., Archibald, S., Fermanich, M. & Gallagher, H. A.(2002). A Cost Framework for Professional Development. Journal Of Education Finance, 28, 51-74.
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D.(2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).(2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing, and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD.
Osterman, K. F.(2000). Students’need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323–67.
Payne, D. & Wolfson, T.(2000). Teacher professional development - The principal’s critical role. NASSP Bulletin, 84(13), 13-21.
Penner, J, S.(1999). Teacher and principal perceptions of factors influencing teachers' decisions to participate in professional development. Dissertation Abstracts International. (UMI NO. 9929289)
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R. & Gallagher, L. P.(2007). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921-958.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Raudenbush, S. & Bryk, A.(2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods(2nd ed.). London: Sage Publication.
Rosenholtz, S. J.(1985). Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence. American Journal of Education, 93, 352-388.
Rosenholtz, S. J.(1989). Workplace Conditions That Affect Teacher Quality and Commitment: Implications for Teacher Induction Programs. The Elementary School Journal, 89(4), 420-439.
Rosenholtz, S. J., Bassler, O. & Hoover-Dempsey, K.(1986). Organizational conditions of teacher learning. Teaching & Teacher Education, 2(2), 91-104.
Sandholtz, J. H. & Scribner, S. P.(2006). The paradox of administrative control in fostering teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1104–1117.
Scribner, J. P.(1999). Professional development: Untangling the influence of work context on teacher learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 238–266.
Shulman, L. & Sparks, D.(1992). Merging content knowledge and pedagogy : An interview with Lee Shulman. Journal of Staff Development, 13(1), 14-16.
Smylie, M. A.(1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 1-30.
Snow-Gerono, J. L.(2005). Professional development in a culture of inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 241-256.
Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., Peetsma. T. T. D. & Geijsel, F. P.(2011), How to Improve Teaching Practices: The Role of Teacher Motivation, Organizational Factors, and Leadership Practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496–536.
Villegas-Reimers, E.(2003). Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature. UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Wise, A. E., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M. W., & Bernstein, H. T.(1985). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices. Elementary School Journal, 86, 61-121.

구매하기 (5,400)

장바구니

국문초록

영문초록

목차

키워드

참고문헌 (71건)